Thursday 10 August 2017

Post No. 1,058 - North Korea

This is an interim extract from the coming weekend's news post, as North Korea requires some attention now:


   -   the UN Security Council has unanimously approved sanctions which could cut one third of North Korea’s income - to the  anger of North Korea (the DPRK) and the USA’s equally extreme counter-threats, which would be a p***ing-up-the-wall contest that the two “giants” (Voldemort II and Kim ⅓) who lead those nations seem to love, except that it appears the DPRK may have miniaturised nuclear weapons, and thus have an active ICBM, and non-nuclear strikes may be being contemplated … at least one of their prisoners has been released … ;   China has stressed the limits of the sanctions and criticised the USA for arrogance, and China's foreign minister has told his North Korean counterpart that [North Korea] should stop carrying out nuclear and missile tests” - see also here;


 All of this means it is up to those people in the world who are more balanced (including me, when I am less cranky :) ) to work at rational steps to ensure peace in this region: those who are familiar with this blog know I advocate for psychic work to strengthen BPM and clear nonBPM units, but it is ALWAYS necessary to take action on ALL levels of Reality, including things like letters to politicians urging mature action, with awareness of the consequences for our children. I mentioned last week, I think, that the US Secretary of State has sunk a key part of a post of mine looking at the history of efforts to restrain North Korea by stating the US doesn’t want to invade *, but the research I’ve done so far suggests that talking gets further than sanctions, although external pressure (sanctions) is, in my view, needed when the DPRK is trying to get too much. This was summed up well by one character in the TV series "The West Wing" – Leo, speaking in Episode 19 of Season 6 (at 33 min. 23 sec.): "When we've tried reforming a communist regime through embargo and severing relations, we've always failed. When we sought change through engagement and trade, we've succeeded."
 * Incidentally, I’ve seen one article suggesting that the US Secretary of State and President are playing a version of “good cop, bad cop”: they may well be – I know I’ve used that tactic myself [playing both roles in different situations] quite a few times: it has limits, but there are times it can work, and, IF they know what they are doing and don’t misjudge, IF that is what is happening, it
MIGHT work … depending on how China reacts to it …