Photo
by TONG
KBP on Unsplash
(A monk is sitting in the Lotus position on the right foreground, with tree branches framing him and the view across a still lake with a rocky shoreline and trees in the midground, and taller trees in the background)
Apart from the ethical reasons and the evidence showing thatopoliticaloviolenceois both wrong AND not effective in terms of accomplishing change for THE BETTER, there are some practical realities to address.
First - and this is the major one - there are always people around the public face of any movement who can and will step into that position.
One video suggestsokillingoH_t l_roin 1940 would have been both moral and effective: no, it would not have.
For a start, G__r _ngoor H_m ml_rooroD__n _tzoor a few others could have stepped into that position - which is why the so-calledoJ_ ly_pl_towas focused or removing several leaaders, and addressing the command structures.
In terms ofotheoHolocaust, others also had roles in developing that atrocity, and would likely have come up with that or something similar anyway, albeit possibly later.
The evilophilosophyoknownoason_z _smohad to be defeated first before BPM change could be possible.
Another point (this is my second issue) is that, under normal circumstances, those stepping into the role would be far less effective. That is true, but those circumstances would not be normal - as has been shown byotheowildlyoviolent andothreateningoreaactionoto lastoweek'soassassination. Under those circumstances, almost anyone of even moderate ability could step in to such a role and theowaveoofohateowould propel them towards some sort of what they would consider success.
Responsibility for unleashing thatowaveoofohateowould lie with whoever had committed theoevilodeedoof theoassassination.
By the way, this shows that theseoactsoofoevil can accomplishoevilooutcomes, which is why they are used -oinoIran, inoViệtoNam,oinoChile,oand elsewhere.
The movements that accomplished change for the better have, on the protestors' side, been nonviolent - such as in the Philippines, in India, theoUSA, and elsewhere.
As a final, minor point, had the video's suggestion for 1940 happened, the people who might have been most annoyed would quite possibly have been the Allies, as the target was notoriously inept at military matters, and acted too early for effective plans and preparations to have been made - as examined in depth in “The War in the West - A New History: Volume 1: Germany Ascendant 1939-1941 (War in the West a New History)” by James Holland (pub. Transworld Digital, 2015, ISBN 978-1448167029; Penguin, Kobo, Amazon).
On the other hand, had the Allies acted more decisively, rather than believing their enemy's propaganda, things would have turned for the better.
Do not assume what works well for one side will work at all for the other ...
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack,
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi
Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).
#PsychicABetterWorld and may all that I do be of value and actively BPM used for and by the nonphysical BPM because #KindnessIsThePoint
Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear
Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.
Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative
Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/