Saturday, 11 April 2026

Post No. 3,426 - The Guidance of Those who Guide Us

driven by an unseen river, a tall waterfall - seen through the branches of trees to left and right in the foreground - cascades down a rocky face in the midground 

Photo by Michael McKay on Unsplash
(driven by an unseen river, a tall waterfall - seen through the branches of trees to left and right in the foreground - cascades down a rocky face in the midground) 

 

One of the interesting and often important aspects of spiritual growth is that we are guided - although we may not be aware of that. 

In the Pagan world, that may come from Deities of Service and Tutelage (which is often still less accurately, IMO, termed Matron/Non-Binary/Patron/Tutelary Deity), but many Pagans also accept the notion of Guides - or, as I term it in the interests of accuracy and safer use of language, BPM  Guides

That guidance is not “set in stone” - we have free will, and we can choose to ignore good advice just as we can choose to follow bad advice. 

But in addition to that, our Guides tend to be those most appropriate to our level of spiritual growth. 

To illustrate that with an analogy, you don’t use University professors to teach kindergarten. 

I have come across some people in spiritualist circles who try to claim their “Guides” told them to be bigots. Now, if that isn’t an outright lie, it may be incompetence - willingly allowing themselves to be misled by fake or nonBPM guides because it is more comfortable for them to be set in their ways of hate and exclusion-to-maintain-self-perceived-social-status. 

But there is the issue of level of awareness of BPM  Guides, particularly for those who will - foolishly - only accept guidance from former relatives

To illustrate this problem, I used the following diagram from my glossary definition of guides: 


It clearly is possible for some incarnate people to be more advanced spiritually than some Guides. 

This is often begrudgingly accepted by those bigots (which is someone who fits the definition of unevolved and/or lacking in growth spiritually) that such people may be walk-ins or some other excuse they use to maintain their comfortable-to-them ways of hate and exclusion-to-maintain-self-perceived-social-status (also termed spiritual bypassing, a notorious problem amongst those who ignore issues such as structural racism)

The points remain: 

  • valid BPM advice from BPM  Guides is socially progressive and inclusive; and 
  • some incarnate people may be more evolved than your BPM  Guides.  

 

Having emphasised that basic level piece of knowledge, there is another point to consider - and this, IMO, needs to be kept in mind by those in the UFO/UAP/ET field who have accepted that one of the main messages of BPM ETs is improving (raising or broadening) our consciousness: 

those who guide us are also receiving guidance (NOT step-by-step orders!) - whether from their Higher Selves, or more evolved entities, as that is a principle which applies all the way up to ... lets term it Source.  

The BPM ETs who are trying to get humanity to be more evolved, including nonviolent and NOT bigotted (exclusionary), also have their spiritual lessons to learn - although those lessons may be far beyond our comprehension.  

Those ETs and other spiritual guide should not be viewed as deity-like or considered to be owed unquestioning/unthinking (toxic) loyalty ... but they are also under no obligation to provide particular assistance or comfort when we face the consequences of rejecting their good advice (although they may choose to do so of their free will)

They know more than us and/or have a better perspective than us ... but that does NOT make them all-knowing nor an always perfect Deity.  



Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking” 
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Optionsor Ko-Fi 
Any and all support will be greatly appreciated, and will aid me in continuing this work
 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our MÓ•gan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  




 

Post No. 3,425 - Some (hopefully) interesting reading / viewing / listening

I recently found the following interesting and/or useful, and am posting them here in case anyone else does as well. 

 

  • “In Conversation with Tim Kaney”   https://youtu.be/dJ510oG_CxQ   “Tim is not a newcomer to BTS and we did a film about his experience. In this conversation we catch up on Tim's story and how this experience has evolved for him into something meaning and important.”   The discussions on interactions with animals and those who have just died were particularly interesting for me.   
  • “First Scientific Confirmation of Consciousness in a Tiny Fish”   https://youtu.be/Drbl5udwk9I   The commentary about these fish testing the properties of the mirror was particularly interesting   
  • “This is What Benevolent Sexism Really Looks Like”   https://youtu.be/mSWj8IM05H0   “They are smart, articulate, and highly educated. They are also the Manosphere's ultimate defense.   Louise Perry, Dr. Sarah Hill, and Erica Komisar are selling a very specific message to modern women: You are unhappy because you are too free.   In this deep dive, I am exposing how these three "female experts" provide the intellectual framework for the Manosphere. We’re breaking down how they repackage submission as "safety," biological essentialism as “wellness”, and professional guilt as “motherly love”.   We are deconstructing Benevolent Sexism—the dangerous psychological trap that treats women as precious creatures who need protection, rather than equal human beings who need respect.”   I (and others) refer to this as toxic femininity. The discussions by the presenter in this are eloquent, informative, and very useful   

 

 

  • “Can Paper Stop Tyrants?”   by public resistance historian Tad Stoermer   https://youtu.be/Qzu5riIu4QM   People have to act on conventions/constitutions/etc    
  • “The Terrifying Real Reason For Jeffrey Epstein's Remote Zorro Ranch Emerges When You Examine the Ranch Next Door”   https://substack.com/home/post/p-193590181   “Part 2 of a series of articles looking at the relationship between Epstein and the San Cristobal Ranch, owned by former OSS member Henry Singleton”   written by Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez   https://alisav.substack.com/   This collates and presents evidence that this was part of Israel’s attempts to obtain nuclear weapons   
  • “Why has the US had to beg for peace with Iran?”   https://youtu.be/Jwi4VCmr-7Q   (text only version at https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/04/10/why-has-the-us-had-to-beg-for-peace-with-iran/)   “The United States did not start peace negotiations with Iran because diplomacy prevailed. It did so because it had no choice. It is running out of weapons.   In the course of a few weeks, the US military has used somewhere between eight and ten years’ worth of Tomahawk missile production. The United States can manufacture approximately one hundred Tomahawk missiles per year. It has fired many hundreds, and possibly a thousand, in this conflict alone. Those stocks cannot be replenished quickly. They cannot be replenished at all in the near term. And without them, and other critical weapon supplies, the USA has no credible capacity to restart a war with Iran.   This is not a temporary logistics problem. It is a structural failure, and neoliberalism created that. The US military, like the US economy, has been run on just-in-time principles:   minimal stockholding,   maximum efficiency,   profits prioritised over resilience.   In addition, more than half of every US missile is manufactured outside the United States, across global supply chains that are now disrupted by the very conflict those missiles were used to fight. Aluminium, a critical component, is, for example, in short supply precisely because the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has constrained the materials needed to make the weapons that were supposed to open it.   The damage goes beyond missiles. Maybe three complex radar systems have been destroyed in the Middle East, each taking up to seven years to replace. The B-52 bombers flying missions from the UK are operating well beyond their operational lifespan. So are the refuelling tankers that support them.   As a result, the Financial Times is reporting that Tr_mp himself appealed for peace via Pakistan, a reality that Pete H_gs_th and the White House press operation will never publicly acknowledge.   Meanwhile, Iran’s military model, based on low-cost, simple, rapidly replicable weapons, has proved devastatingly effective against the world’s most expensive and over-engineered military power. Low-tech warfare has beaten the neoliberal military. Now, as a result, time favours Iran. It can replenish its arsenal quickly. The USA cannot.   The conclusion is stark: US military hegemony has been structurally weakened, and not just temporarily set back. It will take years, and possibly a decade, to rebuild. And in that window, the United States cannot threaten, coerce, or intervene with the credibility it once had. The world has changed. This video explains exactly how and why neoliberalism is the ideology that brought the world’s biggest military power to its knees.”   

 


Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking” 
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Optionsor Ko-Fi 
Any and all support will be greatly appreciated, and will aid me in continuing this work
 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our MÓ•gan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/