Showing posts with label blackmail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blackmail. Show all posts

Monday, 14 March 2016

Post No. 838 - Some minor, mostly magickally focused comments on “The Dresden Files” – Part Three (Books 9 – 12)

Other posts in this series:
More to be posted as I complete them.


Book No. 09 – White Night
(ROC, 2008, first pub. 2007, ISBN 978-0-451-46155-1)
  • magickal kit in a tackle box (p. 7):
    these days, I use a laptop case, but I stretch that to include cloth shopping bags if I need more kit :) . The tackle box is an interesting idea –I’ve use one of those for storing nails and screws and bolts in … maybe I should just bite the bullet and build what I need when we get settled in the new house …
  • copper filings spell (p. 8):
    cool.
  • introduction of examination of neochristian views on magic theme (pp. 6 – 7, 8 – 9, 10 – 13):
    I think one of the things that needs to be said about the hate preached against Wicca, magick, LGBT people, other religions, etc, is that it comes from
    neochristianity – NOT Christianity, which is about loving one’s neighbour as oneself (no, I’ve not become a Christian – I’m still quite happily Pagan).
    In these pages, a few viewpoints are discussed, but the character Murphy doesn’t at all make the point she claims to be promoting, which is an insight into her character flaws: could a flaw in her communication skills be part of what happens to her later, and part of what doesn’t happen between her and Harry?
  • psychism (pp. 27 – 34):
    good explanation of how it works, although in the context of a weird situation that I wouldn’t expect to happen in this-verse. The comment about taking longer to focus when one is learning are correct, although the times are perhaps not as long for the stuff I’ve done / experienced / witnessed in the real-verse.
  • grounding (p. 34):
    good comments.
  • teaching (p. 38):
    excellent comments – one needs to know the whys and why nots as much as the how to.
  • physically glowing (p. 39):
    I’d actually like to be able to physically glow … I’ve read of such happening in one of
    Lobsang  Rampa’s books (pp. 185 – 186 of “Feeding the Flame”): be cool to be able to do it :) This book has a few good moments of humour and understandable – for me – “bloke speak”.
  • wards (p. 55, 61):
    some excellent, very thoughtful comments that are well worth considering in this-verse.
  • prescience (pp. 56 – 58):
    I haven’t come across people like this, which means not much at all: they may exist.
  • giving one’s word (pp. 61 – 62):
    very good comments along the lines of what I have termed “
    mind your Mӕgan”.
  • bigots (p. 89):
    sadly, these are accurate comments.
  • era of magickal languages (p. 94):
    many practitioners choose to use some language other than their native language – well, certainly a significant number of the native English speaking practitioners I know. A thought that came to mind as I read this is: the language chosen may be one from an era where one has positive associations – perhaps especially with magick. Thus, for instance, those people who use Kemetic may have had good magickal associations with a past life in Ancient Egypt. Those who choose Latin may have had likewise, but in Ancient Rome. In my case, I had some good associations from the Middle Ages which make the very limited amount of Hebrew I know very powerful for me.
  • being boring rather than invisible (p. 101):
    yes! – I can totally relate to this: have done it. At times in my life I have focused on generating “undetectability”, which is the same sort of thing, and this crops up in later books.
  • using anti-fae illusion unguent for another purpose (p. 103):
    although the unguent would be less effective than for its intended purpose, this is good adaptability.
  • group effort to build wards (pp. 110 – 111):
    this is something I have been trying to set up through the
    Rangers of the Inner Plane, and the paired exercises when teaching people how to clear. I thoroughly approve of the concept – it is how a group can clear strong uncooperatives, for instance, as groups that I have been a lesser light in have done in years gone by.
  • shield “permeable to the living” (p. 122):
    that’s more like it! Be creative – use your intention flexibly :)
  • “little Chicago” (p. 133):
    what a great idea – and what a MASSIVE amount of work. For what I have to do (e.g., the Psychic Weather Reports), dowsing with a map will do …
  • learning / development / teaching (p. 137):
    really excellent comments – effectively, says one gets to a stage where one has to teach in order to be able to learn more. Very true.
  • temperature changes in response to magick (p. 138):
    in my case, in the real-verse, I often find my body temperature goes up in response to magickal energy, but the temperature of the environment stays the same (I’m not drawing the energy from the physical level, as Harry does – or seems to).I also find that having a lot of nonBPM energy / units near me, or in me / my aura, will make me feel cold - or colder.
  • awareness and thinking (p. 142):
    these are always good – important, even.
  • sensing intruders (p. 151):
    this is something I do occasionally – check for entities / units that shouldn’t be there. May find entities, but more often portals that have been opened and left opened.
  • telepathy (p. 177):
    about time we saw some of this!
  • Elaine’s comments about the White Council (pp. 182 – 183):
    are spot on – she is correct, in my opinion.
  • effect of mind control (p. 184):
    good list – well worth thinking about, and is very similar to lists of symptoms from psychic attack.
  • ghouls (p. 198):
    I looked this concept up after reading these books, and found – according to Wikipedia – that this is
    from Arab mythology.
  • uncertainty re where people fit on the “Jedi-Sith” scale (p. 199):
    great comment – especially the uncertainty. The real-verse is all just shades of grey …
  • conservation of energy (p. 207):
    this principle applies to energy to some extent, but it is difficult to access owing to fact that energy can be shifted between
    Levels of Reality, can be transformed, and can, in fact, be created (e.g., by visualisation – unless that is drawing energy from another Level of Reality). In the context of this series of books, however, it is consistent with the physics-based premise of the Dresden-verse.
  • genetic predisposition for magick (pp. 215 – 216):
    I find one’s spiritual history is more significant than anything in the physical – and if one does look at genetic causes, such influences are spread pretty thin very quickly, unless one breeds specifically for a particular characteristic – which risk inbreeding.
  • admission of someone being faster and better (p. 217):
    nice to see that admission – that is what more is needed of in the real-verse, rather than trying to claim that everyone has equal abilities, let alone conflating ability and worth. I can’t run quickly – athletes are and always will be better at running than me: that doesn’t make them of greater intrinsic worth than  me, nor are the people who have greater intelligence or greater emotional depth or better spiritual development than I inherently better than me in terms of worth / potential. I may, however, have to work long and hard to manifest / develop the same level of ability (and that may be in another life), but that will mean I have realised more of my potential, which is good and admirable, not that I have become an inherently more worth y being – although I may be more useful, in many ways, which is a different matter.
  • rage (pp. 231 – 236):
    Harry’s response is linked to his attitudes towards kids (i.e., that they need to be protected), but there is also a need to consider
    : Do you fight to change things, or to punish? (see here). There are other aspects to this which will also come out later in this book.
  • healing (p. 240):
    YES! This is something else that it is nice to see finally turning up.
  • heightened awareness as a defence (p. 258):
    YES!
  • the dead and pain (p. 308):
    the dead can actually feel pain – for instance, grief and remorse at wrongdoing, and, if they are earthbound, they can feel an extraordinary amount of pain of all types.
  • the potential for change, knowing oneself, and that we are what we do (pp. 332 – 337):
    are well illustrated in the discussion on these pages.
    I also had a thought to explore the concept of equal and opposite reactions from a psychological perspective – which is all but stated in the book. Thus, for instance, if someone is being evil – pushing it out of their mind into manifestation, in a sense, that evil is exerting a bit of pressure back onto that mind. Conversely, if one is trying to be good, the good will exert a beneficial effect back onto the originating mind.
  • don’t write others off as monsters (p. 339):
    EXCELLENT comments – from a pragmatic point of view, even the most evil of people, people like Hitler, don’t stop existing when they die: their Soul / astral / spirit / term of your preference continues to exist, and will come back into incarnation with the same attributes /characteristics / hatreds / insecurities / flaws/ etc – unless someone or some set of circumstances can change them. And hence my
    changing the personality of oppressors post –and, if we are aiming, as a society / species, to deal with these issues constructively and early, then perhaps we will have fewer people like Hitler.
  • the importance of proper motivation when working with power (pp. 350 – 352):
    very good illustration of this.
  • there is always a risk to taking action (p. 353):
    but, as President John F. Kennedy said:
    There are risks and costs to a program of action. But they are far less than the long-range risks and costs of comfortable inaction.
  • no shortage of people who want to kneel to another (p. 370):
    sadly, this is too true.
  • thought is faster than the physical (p. 393):
    yes, this is potentially so – unless one is tired, distracted, etc.
  • use of chaos magick / entropy in a shield (p. 394):
    interesting idea. Not sure I’d want to do it with nonphysical nonBPM energies, but I could well get something useful in the real-verse by thinking about this concept.
  • mistake of two-dimensional thinking (p. 398):
    this is quite true. Furthermore, my training, back in the 1980s, included using dimensional shifts to get behind defences, and countering same when on the defensive.
  • Earth magick spells (p. 428, 431):
    interesting applications. These are something else I will think about at some time to see what I can get out of them.
  • mental psychic attack (pp. 438 – 447):
    good example of what an extreme version of this could possibly look like. In the real-verse, connection to one’s Higher Self would be needed to fight this off.
  • we use 10% of our brain (p. 441):
    this is actually an urban myth. All of our physical brain has a purpose, but we may not realise all that we are capable of mentally – which is where the myth started (as a misinterpretation).
  • holding to one’s word (pp. 458 – 459):
    interesting example.
  • the Paranet (p. 473):
    great idea. I - and many others, no doubt – once hoped that the internet would enable something like this, but I’m finding there is too much rubbish on it now (particularly from role playing games), so an thinking such may need to take a step back, and be built up via personal contacts.
  • always read a Contract (p. 479):
    YES.

Book No. 10 – Small Favor [sic]
(ROC, 2009, first pub. 2008, ISBN 978-0-451-46200-8)
  • Magickally induced fire behaves as physically lit fire does (p. 31):
    what about
    Spontaneous Human Combustion? Also, probably depends how much effort put into controlling the fire – which also applies to other psychically created energies: how much effort is put into managing the effects? As is discussed on p. 32 … :)
  • Pentacle (p. 34):
    good comments re pentacle.
  • Residual magic (pp. 38 – 39):
    yes, and hence psychometry.
  • Balance between using physical devices and visualisation (p. 41):
    good comments.
  • fight or flight response (p. 57):
    this was distorted by the use of male lab rats: there is also a
    network and nurture response.
  • Focus of spell on just hinge (p. 75):
    good!
  • The way Harry climbs down the “chimney” (p. 77):
    I actually think there are better mountain climbing techniques – for instance, the one where you put your back against one side, and use your feet against the other. Would think that gave more and better controlled pressure – but maybe Harry was worried about what the chill of the ice against his back would do. Back to magick.
  • Well, maybe not just yet. Why would someone go somewhere that would put children at risk – particularly when they have a bias towards keeping them safe? Is this Mab’s influence? (p. 142)
  • Try to help first rather than try to smite first (pp. 154 – 156):
    This is admirable, and is much needed when trying to rescue uncooperatives. At least here in the real-verse, rescue involves sending an uncooperative to some place better (or attempting to do so), whereas the situation in the Dresden-verse has been written to include killing as a possible outcome – I’m already dealing with someone who is dead, so I don’t have to face that sort of choice (phew!). The comments about sophistry are particularly good.
  • friendship (p. 162):
    very good comments.
  • bloodlines (p. 167):
    any genetic influence tends to be well diluted after a few generations. Thus, Sanya saying he can trace his physical ancestry back to Salahuddin is actually fairly meaningless.
    Personally, I have found people’s personal spiritual heritage to be far more significant.
    (The way one would maintain and concentrate a physical bloodline is by deliberately breeding for it – which, in terms of psychic abilities, has been well explored in the
    Darkover series by the now  very  discredited  Marion Zimmer Bradley.)
    The comments about “the King and the Land are one” are very Pagan – which reflects the development of agriculture, and the concept of sacrifice, and I think we have evolved past the desperate lack of understanding that connected sacrifice to taking a physical life. (Prior to agriculture, gather-hunter societies were more shamanistic.)
  • shortcomings and imperfections of the law (p. 212):
    these comments are partly contextual to what is happening in the story line, but physical things often are imperfect. As is written in another Dresden book (although not in exactly these words): there is the world that should be, and the world that is; we live in one, and must make the other happen.
  • use of chaos for nonBPM outcomes (p. 217 and elsewhere):
    good discussion on this, and motivations people may have. HOWEVER, chaos can also be used for BPM outcomes – e.g., to break down rigid structures.
  • giving one’s word (p. 230):
    crops up again – is important, kiddies :)
  • hobs and myrk (Ch. 23):
    another instance where I’ve learned some mythology from these books – looked it up on the Internet -
    here , which is a little different from how the term has been used in these books. Didn’t have any luck with “myrk”, but the usage feels right …
  • size of circle (p. 250):
    although it is not standard, I don’t always physically walk to outside of a circle that I am creating: I sometimes just “push” it out to where I want it (within reason – usually this means I cast the circle at the energetic centre of the house, and then push it out to the property boundary).
  • limitations of witnesses (pp. 297 – 30):
    very true comments about some of the rubbish that alleged witnesses to events such as car accidents can come out with.
  • drawing energy in does NOT create a “hole” (p. 322):
    true – agreed.
  • no access to more energy inside a circle (p. 322):
    not in the real-verse.
  • ways of defending against psychic (magickal) attack (pp. 352 – 354):
    interesting ideas.
  • faith healing /banishing (pp. 401 – 402):
    this is a very neochristian way to do this: there are others, EQUALLY as valid and effective, and they are just as “pure”.
  • good comments on friends and trauma (p. 410)
  • pain (p. 441):
    generally has a purpose – I share Harry’s reluctance to shut it out /down.
  • Namsiel’s attack on Harry (p. 460):
    this is a very good example of a multidimensional attack.
  • Marcone (p. 462):
    although Dresden describes John Marcone as “criminal scum”, most of what we see in the early books in the series is reasonable. Later books start to show some of the nastier things Marcone is responsible for.
  • people collaborating with the Denarians “thought they were doing the right thing” (p. 497):
    so did the Nazis at the concentration and death camps. This is rubbish – all people have a conscience: to ignore it, or wilfully allow it to atrophy, is a deliberate act of evil.
  • Deities don’t see things as we do, from one place at one time (p. 514):
    true – good comment. Of course, if we evolve spiritually enough, we can approach this level of awareness also.
  • concept of past, mythic soothsayers as having been earlier incarnations of “the Archive”, driven insane by the burden of their knowledge (p. 524):
    this fits the Dresden-verse well, but also raises the issue of the mental and psychic strain that can go with enhanced awareness and knowledge – which is why it is important to “make haste slowly” …
    This was also mentioned in
    Lobsang  Rampa’s “The Cave of the Ancients”.
  • Soul Fire (p. 537):
    interesting idea, although neochristian. Raises the issue of combining energies / sources of energy for a holistic result …
  • the coming in of the Sight (p. 539):
    excellent comment about how people can be pains when they think their psychism is developing. Have been a few I’ve stopped working with because of that.

Book No. 11 – Turn Coat
(ROC, 2010, first pub. 2009, ISBN 978-0-451-46281-7)
This is probably my favourite book in the series – thus far.
  • Butters’ dubiousness about Harry’s forgiveness of Morgan’s past abuses of Harry (pp. 4 - 5):
    Butters is exactly right. What Harry has forgotten is that we train others how to treat us.
  • seeing clouds of energy and sparks of ideas when using clairvoyance (p. 26):
    yes.
  • clairvoyant perception of the skinwalker (p. 27):
    psychic sensing can and does show the essence of people (unless being blocked or warped by shielding etc). The description of the creature by the protagonist, Harry, is worse than I’ve come across (which may be artistic licence, to some extent, but is also consistent with the notion of wizards as exceptionally superior to us limited hacks), but some of the uncooperatives have actually been fairly bad.
  • Billy and Georgia’s non-reaction to Harry’s distressed appearance on their doorstep (p. 30):
    … really shows a certain disconcerting amount of cluelessness. If a friend shows up and clearly isn’t well, you just help them.
  • the adaptability of humans (pp. 32 – 33):
    true enough, at least for many of us, if not most.
  • the nastier nature of pre-Disney folklore (e.g., the original Brothers Grimm – and before them) and the issue of “psychic weight”:
    both issues are quite true.
    I’ve added the original Brothers Grimm works (which I’ve accessed via the good old Project Gutenberg) to my reading list. It is interesting to read folklore, but I’m always a little wary of giving it too much credence – it risks being a bit like talking to a crowd of witnesses at a car accident: people can be wrong, but think they’re right or should be right, or are just out for attention, etc. So … I take such stories with the folkloric grain of salt …
    On the matter of “psychic weight”, that works both ways: it can be a good weight, just as much as a bad. In fact, when I was at Uni, sharing a flat, my flatmate, clueless psychically and in other ways, came back from somewhere when I was doing my alternate nostril breathing exercises, and even he commented on the almost physical feeling of peace when he walked in.
  • eating magic (p. 53):
    here that idea is again. Seems cannibalistic, which is probably why I have so many problems with it.
  • resistance to subtle but strong mental psychic attack (p. 75):
    good example.
  • Thomas’ struggle against his vampire nature (p. 83):
    this struggle, covered in quite a few places in quite a few books, is very well done – even better than in
    Buffy.
  • people jumping to conclusions about Morgan (p. 89):
    this is a good example of fear clouding people’s judgement.
  • attitude and behaviour of Harry and Morgan towards Molly re emotions (pp. 95 – 100):
    are completely and utterly unacceptable. This rank stupidity on these characters parts, until Harry finally gets his act together later in the book, is extremely annoying … and that’s another example of why Mr Butcher is the successful write, and I’ve got a crushing day job … * SIGH *
  • who Molly is “really” angry with (p. 105):
    this is also just utterly, absolutely and completely wrong. In the real-verse, I know many people who think this way, and that is why the world is so ****ed up. We need more activists – people who are prepared to say “no”, that behaviour is wrong. People like feminists – who are people who care about other human beings, and want everyone to achieve their full potential. Any cretin who considers a feminist is a boot and overalls wearing man-hater is a moron. I mean, after all, I don’t wear overalls, and I’m pretty much prepared to hate people of any gender :)
  • Faraday cage would ground out psychic energies “once” (p. 108):
    not in the real-verse usage of these (e.g.,
    "Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth" by Stuart Holroyd), so why? Because get overloaded and burned out?
  • “time immemorial” (p. 122):
    my take on this phrase is that it generally means “before the time of anyone I know personally”.
  • in the Dresden-verse, Harry finds ley lines jarring (p. 13):
    in this-verse, I find them lovely, mostly soothing, and very, very subtle.
  • Ebenezer’s dress sense (p. 127):
    I like this. I detest pretentious, fancy clothes – and hate dress ups with a passion. I’d rather be comfortable.
  • forensic psychic investigation (p. 138):
    what a great idea. I’ll never try to do that – far too complex, but maybe someone else will – or has already.
  • how does one do the “right thing” if there isn’t a “right thing”? (p. 141):
    very true, and well worth anyone interested in
    Balanced Positivity having a think about.
  • Murphy’s question (p. 155):
    is actually quite significant. No spoilers.
  • Binder’s “goons” from the nonphysical (pp. 160 – 161, 167-168):
    I haven’t come across anything like this in the this-verse, but it is a plausible concept.
  • logical and correct use of circles (pp. 166 – 168, 174 – 175):
    (Incidentally, in the this-verse, when I am
    rescuing  uncooperatives, I get my BPM  Guides to bring the entity into a pre-prepared circle.)
  • Morgan’s award from the Summer Queen (pp. 183 – 18):
    this shows the potential problems of gifts, which I’ve
    posted about previously.
  • example of nonBPM mind control / psychic attack (p. 206):
    this is an extreme, fictionalised example of what can happen … except I’m not so sure it doesn’t happen in the this-verse.
  • using sleep spell as response to damage caused by mind control (pp. 209 – 210):
    this is a very good response in the Dresden-verse. In the this-verse, such matters are more complicated / delicate, as is most healing from major trauma – although going to the astral world is potentially a good reset of some things.
  • Harry FINALLY stands up to Morgan’s provocations and points out some home truths (p. 213).
  • not having relationships so one cannot be threatened / blackmailed through them (p. 217):
    in the this-verse, this is actually a very real issue for people such as members of special forces, and is one of the reasons (there are others) that serving special forces members are not – or should not be – identified by the media. Another example of this sort of potential problem. is the hostages in Iraq who put on shows of tears etc because co-hostages, friends or colleagues, were being threatened off camera. More broadly, it is an extreme example of issues such as
    indirect psychic attack and lifestyle vulnerabilities – and a very extreme response to that risk. In most situations, such extreme measures are not even remotely justifiable: in most cases, it is simply one’s Duty to protect these people, just as one should be caring about and trying to protect people one is not connected to as well.
  • Anastacia’s focused magick – without use of foci / tools (p. 234):
    YES!
  • being choked hurts (p. 239):
    yes, it does – from personal experience. It’s also terrifying – which made the critical response of some people to someone who lashed physically when she was being choked utterly unconscionable and unforgiveable.
  • the “surcease” from pain offered to Harry as an example of control (p. 252):
    actually, this struck me as a retreat to childhood, and thus was repellent to me,
  • longevity, family and perspective (pp. 262 – 269):
    this was quite an interesting conversation (how would one conduct oneself if one knew one was going to outlive one’s family members, as the wizards in the Dresden-verse do?), but:
          (a) the comments about atrocities in Europe not being known, or being unclear are something I dispute, and
          (b) the USA is NOT “the best we’ve had so far” – nowhere near it. I actually consider the USA to be extremely backward in many aspects.
  • discussion on gender, predominantly in context oif an immortal creature (pp. 272 – 273):
    this is actually rubbish, in both the Dresden-verse and the this-verse. Neither protagonist Harry nor talking head Bob are anything but clueless on the topic – as Harry often mentions.
  • fundamental soundness of oral transmission in pre-literate (i.e., no writing systems) societies (p. 274):
    yes – correct, or reasonably so, in the context of important things. In both -verses.
  • Werewolf Will standing up to Harry (pp. 282 – 284):
    good on him! This is great character development for Will (formerly referred to as Billy), and continues a theme (interestingly,
    Mr Butcher has commented that he doesn’t write themes in his books – which parallels remarks by Richard Bach that books tend to smash through walls and say they will not rest until he sets them down in writing- so no planning of themes either … which also is my [limited! – and non-commercial] experience) of Harry learning to give people the knowledge they need in order to be able to make informed decisions.
  • nothing on Binder, so he “has” to be released (p. 288, p. 307):
    rubbish! He assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest!
  • tracking spells (p. 289):
    reasonable explanation.
  • subtle versions of mind control (pp. 328 – 329):
    good comments.
  • the ethics and consequences of actions and tests to detect when these are being bent (pp. 330 – 332):
    well said, Harry.
  • Sanctum ritual (pp. 347 – 359):
    this is an interesting concept –and, I suspect, Mr Butcher’s research has probably given him a better comprehension of what is involved for such shamanic rituals than myself. Personally, I just tend to seek to befriend the spirits of places – e.g., offerings, politeness and niceness when moving to a new patch of dirt, asking permission to enter forests, etc, always making sure one GIVES (e.g., feeding the land spirits) before one even thinks of TAKING (i.e., asking for help). Harry’s approach strikes me as being very macho – and thus wouldn’t have a chance of working with any spirits that are more of the nature of what is generally described as stereotypically female. Of course, in this instance, Harry was dealing with an aggressive spirit, and had a pressing need for the sanctum ritual (getting events away from innocent bystanders).
  • Intellectus (p. 360:
    as described, this is very like true intuition – which is NOT vain imaginings or vague in nature.
  • an example of good ethical choice (p. 364):
    they are far too often scary, even if most don’t involve literal risks to one’s physical survival, as is the case on the referenced page of the book.
  • nightfall (p. 391 – 392):
    there is a great quote on the referenced pages about nightfall, but, more generally, this view contrasts with the elemental approach to arts of the day in
    Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry series, let alone the active power used by sorcerers in Carlos Castaneda’s books.
  • variety of magickal styles (pp, 420 – 421):
    although this is limited to combat situations, the variety of ways that magick can be used is worth thinking about.
  • Binder’s responsibility for a death (p. 438):
    being responsible for someone’s death is ALWAYS a personal matter. There is a lot of rubbish that some people spout that, because they felt no malice in it, it “wasn’t personal”. You cretins, you have TAKEN EVERYTHING from another human being – there little is more personal! (I also see the same sort of crap from bigots who then spout hateful or inaccurate rubbish that is likely to drive people to commit suicide – which has been in the news of late here because of the so-called “debate” over equal marriage.) Going back to the book, Binder is directly and personally responsible for bringing through to the physical and giving orders to the creatures that murdered the warden. This all strikes me as a little too close to the
    Nuremberg  “defence” of “I was only following orders”.
  • examples of positive (constructive) use of emotions in magick (p. 449, p. 451 – 454).
  • the use of magickal foci (p. 450):
    for someone who is so eloquent on the need for and use of magickal foci, Harry sure gets caught without them a lot of times …
  • fight against malevolent entity by Harry, Toot Toot and Listens to Wind (pp. 452 – 467):
    I sometimes use this passage as inspiration if I know I have heavy clearing session ahead of me.
  • example of the difference between justice and retribution (aka, revenge) (p. 474).
  • careful use of words and labels (p. 477):
    this is in relation to the “naagloshii”, also called “skin walkers”, which Listens to Wind tells Harry he should not name to avoid building its reputation of fear.
    On that, I am unmoved by most psychic horror stories: the one that always gets to me is the
    Navajo stories of skin-walkers –I’m fine with the description of these in “Turn Coat”, but when I read anything directly connected to the Navajo or their land, I get chills. I suspect that comes from a past life I had there (I also love jingle dresses / dances, but would be far too embarrassed to have a go in this life). The other North American Indian life I had was in the Akwesasne, which is the life where I was responsible for the death of my brother in that life (I didn’t kill him directly, but had an indirect responsibility), who is now one of my BPM Guides.
    In the course of researching this, I came across some interesting links:   the
    Wikipedia article on skin-walkers;   this article;   the Navaho creation myth;   the Wikipedia article on the Blessing Way, and here, for part of the text of that ritual, the novel “The Blessing Way” by Tony Hillerman (which I have added to my book purchasing wish list, out of curiosity), X-Files season 3 1st episode “The Blessing Way”, and a bunch of videos on YouTube and elsewhere here, here, here, here, and here;   Wikipedia’s list of cryptids and article on the Chupacabra;   the Wikipedia article on the Enemy Way;   the Wikipedia article on Ghost Sickness (also see the film “The Missing”).
    Now, go back and re-consider the topic of fear and phobophages from “Proven Guilty”, and then reconsider Listen to Winds’ advice … ;
  • “good fights”, and the limits of same (p. 478).
  • the possible implications of accepting one’s duty (p. 480):
    good example, although as shown more likely in the Dresden-verse than the this-verse. Here in the this-verse, things like being destroyed by fulfilling one’s duty / obligations towards one’s dependents is far more likely.
  • dealing with rage about injustice (pp. 481 – 482):
    is discussed. I’ve been thinking about this, as I think about my general idea to write more about how one heals the damage of control and similar events, and am thinking of coming up with a flow chart …
  • telepathy (pp. 507 – 508):
    another good example.
  • the possibility that tampering with someone’s mind can lead to happiness (p. 523):
    this is an interesting discussion, and, having thought about it, I can see it happening – including in my life, and the lives of some people I have known.

Book No. 12 – Changes
(ROC, 2011, first pub. 2010, ISBN 978-0-451-46347-0)
This is probably my 2nd favourite book in the series – although it is quite violent: if the violence was less, it would be my favourite.
  • magic and emotion are inextricably connected” (p. 5):
    to the extent that emotions rule people, and thus their Will, yes. It is possible to start to develop one’s ability to think, and thus use one’s Will, and thus rise above some of the motions that one should – e.g., petty jealousy, back stabbing, etc, whilst using the emotions that are good – e.g., love. It is important to do so in a way that doesn’t forget that emotions can be useful indicators – e.g., of situations being inherently wrong, which is a mistake that protagonist Harry and his mentor, Ebenezer, tend to make.
  • decision by Susan to remove her and Harry from their daughter’s life, for the sake of their daughter’s safety (pp. 13 – 14):
    in the Dresden-verse, where Susan and Harry are fighting vampires and other creatures that regularly put their lives physically at risk, Susan’s decision was the only one that could be made. However, this is a personal trigger point of Harry’s (something most of us have), and he reacts true to form.
  • Martin’s comments about events happening outside the USA to Harry (p. 21):
    are very, VERY good. The character Harry is like stereotypical US citizens (the ones we come across in the media – and as often as not made fun of by US citizens, showing an encouraging level of awareness and self-critique-ing :) ), with a strong focus on events in the USA, to the extent that they forget that there is a world elsewhere. I have to say that most Americans I’ve met are not like that, and the fact that Mr Butcher is writing about this shows he isn’t either :) However, such people are present everywhere, in every nation, and suffer from problems such as immaturity, or not being very far along their growth orientation path, or nonBPM influence from parents /peers / etc, and so on. Of course, those people suffering those flaws are not in what is possibly one of the most influential / powerful nations on this planet, at this time …
  • Harry’s quick reactions to his instincts about danger, rather than fluffing about (p. 24):
    GOOD!
  • killing people is ALWAYS personal (p. 41):
    as I’ve explained above. This applies even if it is “click-boom”, as Harry puts it.
  • Harry’s regrets for allowing his emotions to dictate how he uses magick, and to what depth he invests himself (p. 45):
    although this is about personal consequences, this is continuing an exploration of this connection which is building up to something, and is always worth thinking about. As I say in my quotations page:
          Like fire to the physical, emotions to the soul make a good servant, and a bad master.
  • giving people knowledge so that they can make an informed decision (p. 4):
    Harry is finally learning to do this, which is good.
  • discussion about warlocks (p. 65):
    these considerations also apply to
    rescue of uncooperatives.
  • except for the threat to Molly, I am more with the Merlin than Harry on this one: there are times when numbers do matter – which is the sort of decision military commanders have to make, as well as those who do not have enough resources to help everyone (p. 73).
  • “the ways” (p. 75):
    these sound a lot like
    wormholes.
  • Harry’s elaborately manufactured physical circle (p. 83):
    this sounds cool. If I was rich, I might have something like that made, too.
  • the importance of ethical considerations around working with magick (p. 97):
    are well illustrated in this passage, where Harry is hiding things he has that are illegal. Compliance with the law is, in my view, an ethical matter. If you consider a law wrong, work to change it (and, having done that, I do know how much work that entails, and the many, MANY options open to people doing that sort of work), rather than just ignore it. We’re part of this world for a reason.
    In terms of magick, one of the things Harry is slowly learning – and I, also – is that magickal tools are not always essential: when one is advanced enough, they become optional, albeit possibly at the expense of more effort.
  • Martin’s explanation of what Susan has gone through (pp. 149 – 150):
    this is a very good illustration of the saying “walk a mile in another’s shoes before you judge them”.
  • Harry’s acknowledgement that he should have given Susan more information in the events covered in Grave Peril (p. 175):
    this is good, and continues the them I mentioned earlier. (Incidentally, one of the MANY reasons Jim Butcher is a MUCH better writer than me is that he can invest in making a character believable as being at the stage of development they are at, whereas I tend to want to skip the intermediary stuff and get to the final, fully developed version that I can see.)
  • speaking stones (p. 177):
    this is an interesting idea. Along this sort of line, I gave my (adoptive) mother a set of crystals that I kept a matched pair of, so I could better send her healing when she was ill.
    Also, there is a concept of proxy rocks, where members of a circle have two matched items (when I first came across it, I think in  
    "Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth" by Stuart Holroyd, the concept was for rocks, but it could be crystals or some other small item), one on them, to be kept “up to date” with that person’s “vibe”, the other being kept at the circle. If the person is unable to physically attend, their “proxy rock” is set up in their place – which helps them be a part of what is going on (more so if they are doing the same sort of work at the same time, despite not being physically present). Once a month or so, the rocks are swapped over, to refresh the connection.
  • acknowledgement of the inherent selfishness of being focused on blood connections (p. 215):
    this is quite true, but basically just shows that the person concerned has NOT travelled very far along the
    growth orientation path known as Bhakti Yoga.
  • the risks that go with having (or seeking) power (p. 217);
  • the joke from the previous day that Harry just gets (p. 223):
    I don’t get –and none of the online discussion on this that I’ve seen helps. SIGH
  • faith (pp. 252 – 252):
    excellent comments.
  • using mind, rather than props, for magick (p. 280):
    yes – well done, Harry, well done.
  • calling three times to summon (p. 286):
    somewhere else in these books is an explanation that this is more a trigger of an irresistible curiosity for the entities summoned, rather than an overwhelming compulsion to obey an order – which I consider to be quite appropriate. Triplets work well for a lot of people – although the modern generation is more accustomed to working with longer numbers, so that may change. The key here is repetition to strengthen.
  • the things that people will do for love, including self-destruction (p. 293):
    this is quite true – at least when looked at in the context of immediate events. People may change their minds about what they’ve done or committed themselves to later on.
  • Harry’s honesty about what he is doing, and why (p. 298):
    this is good, and offsets – to some extent, at any rate – the selfishness shown on pp. 294 – 295, where he was prepared to kill thousands for the sake of one girl – his child.
  • the mantle is starting to influence Harry in terms of how he is reacting to Molly (p. 316).
  • domovoi vs. polevoi (p. 326):
    Mr Butcher’s superior knowledge of
    mythology on the referenced page led to some very interesting research for me.
  • great joke by Sanya about Harry and the little folk (p. 328).
  • Sanya’s pragmatic acceptance of “bad things” (p. 330):
    I share this to quite an extent – and consider such pragmatism part of
    Balanced Positivity.
  • it’s actually a Pentacle, not a pentagram (p. 429).
  • blood sacrifice (p. 456):
    the concept of taking life as a blood sacrifice is chilling to modern sensibilities, and is – and has always been – spiritually unacceptable. I include the taking of animal life in that – animal rights are just as universal as human rights (which is something I meant to post about years ago after reading
    this, but never got around to it), although I acknowledge that there is a pragmatic element to that (for instance, I know a vegan who had to start eating meat because of iron loss problems caused by heavy periods).
    On the other hand, there can be a place for the use of blood. As an example, I have sometimes used a drop of my blood to help charge and consecrate rune cards that I may have made, I have used things like this to help strengthen the connection to totem poles I have for my use, and I have added a drop of my blood to some spells - e.g., protection of Significant Others or children. Such things should, however, always be used with caution – for instance, the Significant Others may not always be Significant Others …
    In the context of history, people have generally done this, I suspect, because they honestly thought it was necessary (which does NOT make it right – ignorance of the [spiritual] Law is no excuse – people have always had a conscience, and have always – sadly – had the capability to let fear drown it out, but the voice of the conscience [our
    Higher Self and BPM  Guides] is ALWAYS there), which is a point explored in that part of Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry  series where Aderyn’s younger life is being written about – including the fact that the sacrifice was useless.
  • the strength and help of other people (p. 500):
    great example.
  • example of the use of telepathy (p. 514).
  • an incredibly difficult choice (pp. 522 – 523):
    reading this is where I am glad that I am living in the this-verse, not the Dresden-verse, and thus don’t get faced with such choices. Of course it does occur in the this-verse as well, and I am thinking of some of the vicious situations people were pushed into in
    World War Part Two, as examples.
  • the consequences of taking major action (pp. 524 – 525):
    this is a bit like the consequences of taking over another nation – I mean, “causing regime change”.
    There have been some concerning fall outs from such events – for instance, I understand Japanese soldiers were used as police to maintain order in parts of South East Asia after the end of
    World War Part Two, which did cause resentment and social problems, whereas in Iraq the Iraqi army was disbanded rather than being subjected to de-Ba’athification – which would have been required to avoid the problems caused in South East Asia.
    The pages are worth reading and considering – and the fallout gets discussed more in subsequent books.
  • comments about choice, and that others cannot take away your Will (pp. 530 – 531):
    these are actually a bit naïve – things like torture for long periods can break people, and that is when you do lose your Will.

Keywords:
abuse of power, anger, animals, artificer, attitudes, authentic presence, awareness, balance, Balanced Positive, Bhakti, blackmail, blood, challenge, change, chaos, children, circle, clairvoyance, concentration, consequences, control, death, Deities, dimensions, discrimination, divination, dowsing, Earth (element), earthbound entities, elements, emotions, energy work, equal and opposite reaction, ethics, evil, faery, faith, family, fear, fight or flight or network and nurture, Fire (element), focus, folk lore, forgiveness, friends, genes / genetics, gifts / giving, grounding, growth orientation, guilt, healing, history, honour, ignorance, informed decisions, insularity, invisibility, invocation, isolation, judging others, justice, knowledge, language, levels, limitations, love, Mӕgan, magic, magickal language, magickal techniques and styles, magickal tools, manifestation, metaphysical mass, metaphysics, moral courage, motivation, mythology, myths, names, neochristianity, nightfall, Paganism, pain, Pentacle, pentagram, personal responsibility, perspective, phenomena, power, prejudice, preparation, prophecy, protection, psychic attack, psychic development, psychism, psychology, racism, reincarnation, rescue, residue, responsibility, revenge, risks, rituals, sacrifice, scepticism, Seelie, self knowledge, sexism, shielding, (the) Sight, society, spells, Spiritual Maturity, spirituality, subconscious, submissiveness, sunrise, survival after death, teaching, telepathy, temperature, tests, thaumaturgy, the Greater Good, train others how to treat us, uncooperative, understanding, undetectability, Unseelie, ward, werewolf, yoga,


Sunday, 6 March 2016

Post No. 834 - Some minor, mostly magickally focused comments on “The Dresden Files” – Part Two (Books 7 – 8)

Other posts in this series: 
More to be posted as I complete them.

Book No. 07 – Dead Beat
(ROC, 2005, ISBN 978-0-451-46091-2)
I was looking forward to reading this book – after all, it has a zombie dinosaur. I’m even more unmoved about zombies than I am vampires, but – hey, dinosaurs :) (which I used to be terrified of as a kid, after having seen Fantasia; I made myself see Jurassic Park [several times], and became interested in the science and then – hey presto! I’m now interested in the things … so long as I don’t have to go anywhere near a carnivorous one in real life).
  • not knowing what comes after death (p. 19):
    I disagree with that: we do have good evidence (the concept of proof is a different matter, and one that I consider highly subjective – i.e., what one person considers proof, another won’t) of what comes after – see here, for instance.
  • garlic to repel vampires (p. 21):
    As mentioned previously I have been told that it is garlic flowers, rather than the cloves, that do the repelling (see, for instance, here, here and here).
  • there are plenty of incarnates like Mavra (I’m thinking of people I’ve had to put up with in office and “professional” [which can be incredibly competitive] environments, particularly before anti-bullying laws, clubs, etc). Another topic which comes to mind here is the potential for the “banality of evil”, although that clearly doesn’t apply to “Black Court” vampires like Mavra. See also here and here.
  • necromancy and ectomancy (p. 36, but crops up at various places through the book, and is a major theme. I thought of this at around p. 130 – which has a good example of ectomancy):
    the term necromancy is defined by the online Oxford English Dictionary (OED) as “The supposed practice of communicating with the dead, especially in order to predict the future”. The Wikipedia article takes a similar view, but also notes that some people these days use the term as a reference to “manipulation of death and the dead”. It is the latter sense that the character Harry Dresden uses the term “necromancy” in the modern sense of the word, whereas my understanding is the original, broader term.
    Dresden also uses a term
    “ectomancy”, which I couldn’t find in the OED. However, I have found at least one other reference to it – here, so this is one of several instances where I have learned something from these books.
    Now, I am aware of claims that there are entities that allegedly scavenge energy associated with the transition we know as death, but I don’t count those with physical scavengers, who are playing an active part in the natural world’s recycling process and manage risks such as illness or disease in the process.
    In the context of the comments on page 130, we decorate “dead” things like nails and hair in honour of the natural processes of life, not the
    nihilistic ravings of the disturbed entity making the claim.
  • building up energy for a working (p. 40):
    the diving board analogy is quite good. With regard to ways of building energy, I often use visualisation,
    flaming, breathing exercises, meditation, etc.
  • perfect replication of cells (p. 48):
    in the physics-based context of the Dresden-verse, this is an excellent explanation of how wizards and witches are able to live much longer than
    muggles, and it the association of imperfect replication and ageing is, I understand, reasonably well accepted in the real-verse. However, in terms of who lives longer in the real-verse, there are also scientifically accepted issues around genetic inheritance, lifestyle factors, etc, and also issues around how one works with nonphysical energy, emotions, thoughts, etc.
  • with power comes responsibility (p. 61):
    yes, YES, YES! This theme is one of the reasons I LOVE this series of books – and it is a them which is so TRUE.
  • duty to share knowledge to those who need it, but that knowledge comes at a price (p. 63):
    I consider that the character Harry Dresden is, in general, too reluctant to share the knowledge he has. That reluctance is understandable, given the particulars of the Dresden-verse, but in this-verse, the main constraint on passing knowledge is to make sure it does not go to those who could or would abuse / misuse / fail to use it (all three are serious spiritual errors, although not of equal import), and, at the same time, make it DOES go to those who need it – which is a little bit like making sure what kids are exposed to is age appropriate, but in a spiritual sense for people who are chronological / nominally adults. In that spirit, I started this blog, with (a) information on it that is largely relatively safe, (b) regularly topped up psychic protections around who comes across it, and (c) a few matters I am keeping to myself until I can find someone to teach face to face. Issues such as knowing how to
    ground and shield and flame and set up basic protection are fundamentals that, in my view, EVERY single sentient being – including all humans – should know.
  • Chapter Six:
    this chapter is, in effect, a pretty good discussion on scepticism / denial / etc. The comment about people denying what they cannot fight out of fear is, sadly, true – and hence the need for more knowledge, as mentioned in the preceding point: defence against the majority of psychic problems and threats is often surprisingly simple.
    As mentioned previously, vampires / zombies / werewolves are not matters I claim any particular knowledge of, but the comments about the parallels between missing persons rates and herd losses to predators was intriguing, and I have tried – unsuccessfully – to check this on the internet.
    Some of the abilities mentioned on p. 73 are close to those claimed by Tibetan lamas, such as transmigration of the soul into another body. The easiest reference for that is
    Lobsang  Rampa’s “The Rampa Story”, but I have seen other Tibetan texts which cover that as well.
  • the White Council and the wardens (p. 84):
    as mentioned previously, this is a story-telling device, part of the Dresden-verse, not this-verse.
  • Deities, magick and expectations (p. 87):
    good comments here about the interactions between these three – particularly that, if one expects it, it is necessary.
  • Sheila’s recall (p. 92):
    there is more to come on the character Sheila,  but this recall is actually an excellent example of the power of the unconscious to recall details that the conscious edits out for the sake of limiting our perceptions to what is manageable.
  • pop culture references (p. 96):
    this is something Mr Butcher has discussed on panels, and is an entertaining part of the novels (there is even amusing one pop culture reference somewhere that Harry Dresden complains he is supposed to understand but doesn’t) – mostly. There are some that, as someone who is not a citizen of the USA, I have no clue about – and others that reflect the fact I have no interest in horror movies, computer games, etc.
  • wear and tear of life and of being magickally active (p. 97):
    very true comments that I can relate to.
  • Chapter Eight:
    this chapter has some good comments about power, and motivations for having / acquiring power.
  • blackmail (general comment):
    one of the fundamental problems about agreeing with blackmail requests is that it sets a precedent for future instances. That is the reason governments, for example, refuse to negotiate with terrorists. I understand that, but, if I was in the situation that Harry was placed, I don’t know how I would react. Some of it would depend on the level of awareness that those being threatened had – for instance, if they understood the reasons for not negotiating with terrorists, I would be more inclined to resist; the close they were to me, the more difficult that would be.
    I have sometimes wondered what would happen if, say, the family member of a person killed in a piracy incident off Somalia sued those who had previously paid ransoms for making it more likely that the later incident occurred.
  • limits on one’s ability to help (p. 113 – 115):
    it is good for people to understand that (i) there can be situations which are too big for them to get involved with, (ii) that other people with more skill / experience / (relevant forms of) strength may be able to deal with, and (iii) that trying to help those more appropriately skilled / experienced / strong people may be more of a hindrance than help – for instance, just being there may be a distraction. As an example of that, at the end of the film
    “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix”, there comes a moment when Professor Dumbledore has Voldemort contained in water: all that is needed is for Dumbledore to be able to keep the containment going for a few minutes until the aurors (maybe that’s a job description for me :) ) arrive – but Harry Potter wanders out of the safe area he has been in, and while Dumbledore is distracted throwing Harry back into safety, Voldemort breaks free, and the next three films eventuate.
  • subtle influences associated with a demon (pp. 117 – 118):
    good discussion on this, which applies generally with regard to psychic attack.
  • Harry Dresden’s behaviour towards Mort (pp. 123 – 124):
    is wrong – spiritually speaking. It is consistent with the flawed character that Harry Dresden is, and those flaws are essential for what is going to happen down the track, but, in this-verse, it raises the issue of what you are prepared to go without for the sake of being ethical. In my case, one example is an organisation I was invited to join when I was in my 20s: I specifically knew that they would teach me a breathing exercise which would allow conscious etheric travel, which is something I wanted then and still want now (astral travel is different), but I would have to agree to give them 10% of my income. As I considered that expectation of money to be unreasonable, I declined. I have not come across that breathing exercise anywhere else, but I still consider that I made the right decision (the right sacrifice, in a sense). (Interestingly, since then the group has become more public, and their books are now available on a public website … but still don’t have that particular breathing exercise :) – and do show things like a tendency towards patriarchal values, to the point of sexism, that I particularly disagree with.)
  • example of using ectomancy (p. 130):
    rather cool example, actually: I’ll keep that in mind for my magickal workings.
  • dream sequence with Harry’s dead father (pp. 136 – 137):
    I actually consider this to be an example of great mediumship – the sort of thing one can see demonstrated by GOOD
    mediums in Spiritualist churches (and NOT demonstrated by BAD mediums).
    It also shows the character development that harry experiences, as, in previous books, he had stated no-one knew what happened after death, but now he is starting an arc that will lead to considerable awareness / experience of that.
    The main thought I had when reading this, though, was that fear has evolutionary survival value. I’ve read a theory that being paralysed with fear would result in a small mammal a few tens or a hundred or so million years ago being less likely to be noticed by a big dinosaur stumping its grumpy, low-blood-sugar way through the jungle in search of a tasty morsel. Nowadays, that is less likely to be of benefit when one is terrified by, say, an out-of-control bus that one needs to get out of the way of, but, in general, fear is still something to take note of, although one may need to change the evolutionary response (which is NOT only
    fight or flight: it also includes network and nurture, but the stupid scientists apparently only used male lab rats) which we have imprinted into our brain stem for the modern world. Thinking is how we do that.
    (I have a theory that Deities may have helped “create” this reality by bringing a characteristic into existence – for instance (and I am simplifying grossly here), maybe
    Týr brought the concept of social justice to the world (this came in well before the Viking era, though), or Heru (“Horus”) the concept that one’s home / family / hearth was something to protect. If that is so, which Deity brought fear into the world, and how does one work with them so that one can better react to fear?)
  • Anthropomancy (p. 167):
    this exists, and is wrong, as far as I am concerned – whether it involves taking human or animal life (
    haruspicy is the word for the latter). It is, as with ALL psychic tools (Tarot, dowsing, etc), a way of getting round the blocks that one has to being psychic and getting accurate and relevant impressions oneself. To take another life – possibly painfully – to cover one’s personal inadequacies is, in my view, spiritually abhorrent.
    It also does come at a price – part karmic, part the inherent damage associated with the act (which is similar to the damage use to create a
    horcrux in the Potter-verse).
    My view may be partly influence by my many years as a
    Buddhist (I am not Buddhist now), but it is a view I held as a child, when I lost faith in the neochristianity I was exposed to at Sunday School when they said animals didn’t have souls. I can vouch for them having that, as the three cats sleeping on the bed beside my desk as I write this have all been with me in previous incarnations.
    This has been a point of division in Pagan and Shamanic circles.
  • courage vs. fear (p. 185, pp. 227  229):
    this is a particular theme being explored in this book, mostly in the context of standing up to stronger forces. It is largely in the same sense of courage as “
    going over the top” in a war, when one’s physical survival is at risk – or certain to end. As such, it misses out on the less spectacular, but equally – or even more so – admirable courage of “doing the right thing”, as shown by whistleblowers, parents trying to raise their children to be as good human beings as is possible, etc, although moral courage is very capably explored in other books in this series (e.g., “Turn Coat”, Proven Guilty”, “Summer Knight”).
    Another example of courage is sacrificing oneself for others’ benefit, perhaps by staying in a soul-killing job to support a family, or taking on caring for someone.
    In the magickal world, tests of both physical and moral courage can occur. As an example of physical courage, when I was learning in the 80s, I was channelling so much energy under my 50 kg rose quartz crystal that I actually felt I was at risk of dying: I must have passed any test that was involved, as I relaxed, and put up with the pain, and survived. Tests of moral courage come about every time we have to fight off psychic attack, or make a decision about “right” or “wrong”.
    The other really major point that can happen here is: we can all change. The inclusion of the character Waldo Butters as a key part of the fear side of the debate becomes very significant a few books hence.
  • types of nonBPM psychic attack (pp. 195 – 196, 199 – 201, 279 – 281, 395 – 396, 422, 437 – 438, 448 – 449):
    if one shifts what is happening from the physical to the non-physical, there are some very good examples of the wide range of types of nonBPM psychic attacks which can occur in the real-verse. In all such instances, a very useful defence is contacting one’s
    Higher Self. As with all such skills, the time to develop that (through meditation) is NOT when one is under attack and in need of a well-developed proficiency in that skill …
  • Valkyrie (pp. 207 – 208):
    this is a better, more feminist description of a Valkyrie than many others I have read: these Valkyrie are what they are meant to be – women warriors! It is only the last millennia of neochristian social engineering that have left us thinking women can’t or inherently don’t want to be warriors. This description gave me the inspiration for a Valkyrie Tarot that I am working on (as with many things, time and energy restricts what I can get done * SIGH * )
  • the US health system (p. 218):
    is really stupid. When I was in the Correllian Tradition I came across several instances where people couldn’t afford critical health treatment, and I dread the possibility that we could wind up with such lunacy here. If there is to be a change, I would rather it was towards the UK system, but people presume a lack of good will on the part of most other people using the health system, and thus object to money - which attitude is actually a particular outcome of the non-UK systems, although the UK also has (predominantly rich?) people who object to their system.
    What is interesting in terms of this review was the throw away question about what premiums would be for a 250 year old. In my case, here in Australia, I have an officially preserved medical age of 30 years, because of when I took out health insurance, so, if it was me that was 250, I could possibly do quite well :) … but, if that was in the Dresden-verse, the age-defying characteristics of wizards would mean one probably wouldn’t need to use it all that much. Darn.
  • shooting at ambulance drivers (p. 220):
    sadly, this happens in a few places – I’ve even read of morons attempting to sexually assault female ambulance drivers because they thought the women were strippers.
    This page also shows the problem of scepticism in the medical profession, which is a MAJOR problem in the real-verse.
  • claimed benefits of necromancy (p. 225, and pp. 330 – 338):
    this is a very interesting discussion – e.g., benefits of Einstein still living is counter-balanced by down-side of Hitler still living.
    This issue was also explored in the
    BBC  “Torchwood” series “Torchwood: Miracle Day”, and Katharine Kerr’s Deverry series with the prolonged life of the character Nevyn.
    In my case, I would that there is a benefit in being able to digest one’s experiences and “reset” in-between incarnations when one is mortal.
    However, there is an argument to consider that maybe we could / should live longer – which has been mentioned by a number of sources, including Lobsang  Rampa.
  • the exhaustion of persistent pain (p. 226):
    yes, absolutely true  just ask my or my partner’s arthritis :)
  • Cowl and Kumori: as a general thought, I hope their backstory comes out in a future book.
  • devouring spirits to take their power (p. 245):
    I have never heard of this before reading it here. I thought it might be a case of Mr Butcher’s research being better than mine, but when I started looking into it, I found it in the computer game world – is that where this comes from?
  • purpose / underlying assumptions for wards (p. 250):
    as with the character Harry Dresden, I build wards for limited purposes. Their strength is gradually eroded by the soup of energies that exists in the real-verse, so they need top up from time to time (provided life does not distract me), and I may provide an extra boost to deal with any extra problems. This whole situation of prolonged attack is one that is worth thinking of.
  • creating chaos as a preparation for a nonBPM event (p. 273):
    this can happen in the real-verse as well.
  • being good with what one is familiar with (p. 280):
    very true.
  • thaumaturgy (p. 299):
    the online Oxford Dictionary defines “thaumaturge” as “A worker of wonders and performer of miracles; a magician.”
    The Wikipedia article quotes Isaac Bonewits as saying this is "The use of magic for nonreligious purposes; the art and science of 'wonder working;' using magic to actually change things in the physical world."
    There is a wiki on the Dresden-verse, which describes thaumaturgy along the lines of “as above, so below” – create a link with something, and you can track them (which is a very limited definition).
    I don’t normally use this term. For some reason, I have a notion that is somehow connected with “low magick” (done by witches and other everyday people), as opposed to so-called “high magick” (done by Ceremonialists and others who created a distinction around a millennia ago that included slightly neochristianising their stuff so they could avoid the vendettas of the neochristians; this definition of “high magic” as something that is city related is new to me – see also here) – see here and here and , but every time I try to check how I got that notion, I cannot find any reason for it. Possibly it is a carry over from a previous life.
    I’ll go with Isaac Bonewits on this one
  • loss of Wardens (p. 357 – 361):
    this can happen in the real-verse as well, although not as a result of death in battle: more usually it is the distractions / temptations / demands of everyday life.
  • the leader of the wardens not knowing Harry has been abused by Morgan (pp. 363 – 364):
    if this happened in the real-verse – e.g., a business CEO didn’t know about hazing / bullying, the CEO would quite rightly be found incompetent, and held to account. The same applies to spiritual / psychic organisations.
  • metaphysical imprint / mass (pp. 376 – 377):
    this is true enough – and crops up in other books, but up to a point. As an example of where it doesn’t apply, I have found cats can go in and out of circles without disturbing the circle at all.
  • night (p. 382):
    it would be interesting to compare the Dresden-verse view of night with the elemental cycles based view in Katharine Kerr’s Deverry series.
  • emotional control (p. 383):
    Harry Dresden always has reasonable emotional self-control / self-discipline when doing magick. After the last few decades, my control is not what it used to be … SIGH.
  • joke by Cowl (p. 390):
    I quite liked this joke – and most of the other humour scattered throughout the books (but not all: I don’t think that would ever be possible, to have everyone happy with all aspects of something).
  • the subtlety of negative psychic control (p. 406):
    this is an excellent example of this. In the real-verse, it would be countered by persisting with clearing, and by tuning in to one’s Higher Self.
  • faith (p. 431):
    yeah, right. This is good for the story, but, in terms of magickal theory, can be viewed as manifestation through positive thinking. As such, one needs to be aware that the energetic connections can be manipulated, blocked or twisted by others.
  • some things are more important than survival (p. 444):
    yes, absolutely.
  • ritual vs. rite ceremony vs. vs. spell:
    sometimes I consider people get themselves into quite a tizz over things that don’t really matter – a bit like the stupidity over folding vs. scrunching toilet paper (solved by doing both, as someone I know does), or which end of the egg to cut open (from “Gulliver’s Travels”). Some this is just things like ****** regional variations, for Goddess’ sake!
    As far rite, ritual and ceremony go, I’m not going to buy into this one – and I won’t accept Harry’s definition of this, either. I’ll give a few links here so you, Dear Reader, can contemplate and possibly make up your own mind: here, here, here (which points out that rite has a more generic usage as well),
    I will buy into the definition of (magickal)  spell, however: to me that is an act of active magick which is intended to last beyond the act whereby it was created.
  • zombie dinosaur (p. 455 on):
    this is the only interest I have had in zombies – and, as I have already mentioned, I was looking forward to reading this book from the moment I found out that a zombie dinosaur was involved :)
  • magickal styles during combat (pp. 460 – 462):
    good examples for consideration of.
  • comments by Harry’s dead father (p. 508):
    very wise comments here. I particularly liked that, as long as one believed one was responsible for one’s choices, one basically a decent human being. It’s a little simplistic is a few extreme cases, but it has a subtlety and elegance that could be useful for most everyday situations.
    I will meditate on this.


Book No. 08 – Proven Guilty
(ROC, 2009 (?), first pub. 2006, ISBN 978-0-451-46103-2)

  • Chapter One – this is a good development of the tension over the Laws of Magic in the Dresden-verse, and a lead up to further discussion on them in this and subsequent books. It is worth reading this and thinking about the ethical issues for the exercise of doing so.
  • unsavoury magic (p. 17):
    should be described as nonBPM (in the this-verse :) ), or at the very least negative magick – NOT “black magic”, which contributes to the ubiquity of racism.
  • “Black Staff” (p. 19):
    again, colour problem, but: as described, the position is a spiritual no-no. From a long term perspective, as described, it would be better to let the organisation end, and work on starting something better – something which was better based on ethics, true spirituality, the use of compassion and
    authentic presence, etc. HOWEVER … it could also be argued that the position is more like a form of magickal military special forces, which slightly alters the perspective – but not the requirements for ethics, etc.
  • use only 10% of our brain (p. 23):
    this is not actually correct: see
    here, which includes a comment from over a century ago about people not reaching their full mental potential, which is a different matter.
  • Chapter Three:
    in this Chapter, protagonist Harry Dresden has a conversation with the shadow of a demon that is in him. This effectively describes a useful exercise in reviewing why one does things – i.e., getting one’s ethics and worldview and so forth established and described … at least, as best one can do at that time; it is the sort of thing that is worth doing now and again for growth and ethical review.
  • involvement of mundane law (pp. 38 – 41):
    Murphy has a good point about magickal stuff not being above the law: as
    my ethics page points out, any fraud by me is actionable under law – but I am also protected against attempts at blackmail (it has been tried on me – once, and unsuccessfully), assaults, abusive language, etc. It cuts both ways.
    Going back to the book, on the other side of the coin, there is a good point about how using nonBPM magick will change the user – subtly, and in unhealthy ways. It’s probably a bit like psychically gargling with a toxin before spitting it onto someone else, or
    what I wrote about anthropomancy and haruspicy when reviewing “Dead Beat”, or this article, which includes the following: "He also said that a [Navaho] witch can perform this type of ceremony only four times in his life, because if he tries it more than that, the curse would come back on the witch himself. He also told me that if the intended victim found out about it, then the curse would come back onto the person who had requested it." Perhaps one could even consider it from the point of view of a mental / psychic cause / effect or action / reaction point of view – i.e., does pushing nonBPM out of oneself into the world create a back pressure of nonBPM onto one’s own mind, and thus inherently damage oneself?
  • “Little Chicago” (p. 51 – 52):
    what a fascinating idea! I quite like the concept, but … it would be a lot of work, dowsing with a good map can be quite useful, and – when I master it – etheric travel is also probably easier …
  • time magic (pp. 55 – 57):
    fairly standard discussion, done well. Should be read by newbies.
  • symptoms of aggressively nonBPM magic (pp. 57 – 58):
    well discussed in this section.
    Zimmer Bradley’s “Heartlight” and “Dark Satanic” had some useful information on this as well (and some stereotypical, less useful information).
    My work is based around the biggest source of nonBPM energies in the world: everyday people, living everyday lives with stress, time pressure, money problems, office politics, family dynamics, etc.
  • choosing magickal tools (aka “props”) (p. 61):
    choosing tools that are personally meaningful is always better – and that is in many books, along with advice to speak from the heart when doing magickal rituals as well. For newbies, however, some form / structure / examples can help narrow the field of possibilities down from “the entirety of creation” to a more manageable selection thereof …
  • “manipulation” (i.e., nonBPM, negative psychic control) through wheedling (p. 65):
    this behaviour is WRONG – utterly, completely, absolutely, WRONG. It is wrong spiritually, ethically, socially, and in every other way. I know quite a few people who think it is a normal part of living, particularly if one is less physically strong than others, but it isn’t. This is
    control – purely and simply nonBPM, negative psychic control, realised through words and body language. It is how some people later graduate to such things as getting others to commit murder on their behalf. It is offensive, NOT cute, and anyone who thinks it is cute needs to read the following:
Females, get over 'cute'. Get competent. Get trained. Get capable. Get over 'cute'. And those of you who are called Patty and Debby and Suzy, get over that. Because we use those names to infantalise females – we keep females in their 'little girl' state by the names we use for them. Get over it. If you want to be taken seriously, get serious.
Jane Elliott
  • Harry’s talk to Molly (pp. 82 – 83):
    I know many people who could have benefitted from Harry’s talk to Molly – some of whom I used to live with. Because of their behaviour, I have been unable to do the more subtle psychic work that I used to (e.g., set up the sort of gentle healing babies in hospitals need), let alone the heavy duty clearing work I want to get back into. Sadly, I now think I will probably be unable to do anything like that until I retire – money, time, energy, other commitments, etc are all getting in the way :(
  • different parenting styles (p. 94):
    The issue here isn’t “which parenting style is correct”, which is a nonsense question, but:
          which style is best for which child?
          how much of each parenting style needs to get used for each child?
          how can one know when to change parenting style?
    I posted once about these sorts of issues, under “A plan for having kid(s)”, in
    Post No. 489 - Attaining mastery.
  • horror movies: as a general comment, ho hum …what's for tea?
  • effect that killing has on the killers (pp. 136 – 137):
    unlike previous mentions of the effects of nonBPM actions on those who do them, this is looking at the effect of what could be considered nonBPM actions on people who are doing them for BPM reasons – e.g., the police officer who stops someone who is on a killing rampage by shooting and killing the killer.
    In the real-verse, not everyone has enough
    authentic presence to stop such rampages (although I know former Archbishop Desmond Tutu once stopped a many from being necklaced), which means the choice is either (1) allow such people to go on such rampages without any check, and send the world backwards to being worse than a jungle, or (2) accept that the lesser of two evils is to stop such people destroying not only the people they have killed (and their Significant Others), but also stopping them from destroying – or setting back, at least - the potential for the world to be a better place.
    This is a concept I have discussed many times – generally in the context of
    rescuing  uncooperatives (and, as a result, those being controlled by the uncooperatives. One day I must explore adding occlumency from the Harry Potter-verse to what I have written about control and how to resist it … for which I currently recommend being proficient in, and regularly using, basic skills such as flaming, grounding, shielding / protection, meditation (particularly when it is used to enable contact with one's Higher Self), looking after one's psychic health, looking after one's health on other levels (physical, emotional, mental, spiritual), dealing with issues (such as lifestyle vulnerabilities [see for instance, here, here, here, here, here, and elsewhere on my main blog]), and, above all else, CLEARING … ).
  • psychic predator(s) (pp. 142 – 143):
    although the protagonist Harry Dresden uses the term “spiritual predator”, I prefer to reserve the term “spiritual” for more pleasant / constructive / BPM topics. As described by Harry, the predator is basically a sadist using psychic, as opposed to physical, tools.
    I’ve done quite some work on the topic of phages (see
    here and here) as a result of the concepts described in this book, which is another example of finding guidance wherever one can find it.
  • clairvoyants impressions of Murphy and drug addict (pp. 151 – 152):
    except for the
    neochristian overtones, these descriptions are fairly accurate, actually.
  • the toughness of the character Pell (p. 159):
    this is one of the most important lessons from this book. This character has NO psychic power or knowledge whatsoever, and yet he persists and resists and, eventually, will outlast it, through sheer stubborn “toughness”. By being dedicated to being one’s true self, one can endure a great deal (although there are limits).
  • phobophage (p. 161):
    This led to my posts on the topic of phages (see
    here and here). – another example of getting something good in the real-verse from this series of books :)
  • the war between the Seelie and Unseelie courts (p. 177):
    I find this a bit overdone, particularly as my impression of the matter is that it is more like the dynamic balances represented by the
    Taijitu (the so-called “yin-yang symbol). There are opposing polarities, but they are dynamic, which leads to constant renewal, rather than being bulls with locked horns.
    I do know, however, from having read ahead, that this apparent conflict has a twist that is yet to be revealed … :)
  • colour associations (p. 208):
    I agree that the associations people have with colours tends to relate to what they were first taught about them. In addition, people tend to perceive colours differently (e.g., ask a room of people to visualise the colour green, and you will probably get a different shad for each person), and character / life experience will influence matters as well. For instance, I have strong negative associations with the colour red, because of my experiences of male aggression and warfare; others relate to the positive aspects of this such as passion, life, energy, etc.
  • redirection of inbound energy (p. 228):
    this is fairly standard amongst reasonably advanced magickal practitioners.
    Kerr  Cuhulain’s Order of Scathach has some training on this, but you need to be a member to access those lessons now – which is better, as it had too much access to non-members such as myself. I think, from memory, some of Kerr Cuhulain’s books have information on this as well.
  • blasting rod (p. 256):
    this has been mentioned earlier in this series of books, but I’ve only just now thought to mention that I haven’t heard of such a thing anywhere else. There are few novel ideas in this book – such as the shield bracelet, which I’ve made a
    non-bullet-bouncing paper version of (gives emotional and psychic protection only), and hope – one day … * SIGHS * - to make in copper, and the blasting rod could, I suppose, be considered a specialised version of a wand … .
  • anger (p. 261 – 262):
    this is a good description of what can happen when anger takes over – in this instance, someone bleeds to death that protagonist Harry Dresden could have saved, but he was letting rip against an entity that had already been largely beaten.
  • the problem of people with guns (p. 264):
    in this case, people firing blindly, whilst panicked, kill and/or injure people they can’t see in a darkness induced magickally by “the baddies”. Although Harry Dresden does use guns, he emphasises several times in several of the book that they can cause injuries to other people as they pass through walls, ricochet, etc.
  • Charity (pp. 337 - 343):
    these pages show why the character Charity Carpenter is a lying, two-faced, hypocritical – er, not-nice person. I have little time for people who lash out at others for being open about characteristics / abilities they have, but suppress – such as closet LGBT people who are vindictive towards LGBT people. Charity is like that, and no matter how well she is portrayed as being a good and caring parent, I consider that essential dishonesty outweighs her “good” aspects. That, of course, is me being judgemental :)
  • preparing for a major ritual (p. 353):
    as I’ve mentioned a few times, we live in a soup of energies – several soups, actually, at least one per
    level of existence, and different blends in different places on each level. As an example, the soup on energy I sit in at work is very different to the soup I live in at home – the latter being much better, thank the Goddess! There are comments on this page about the effects of the day and time constraints, and how that can impact on a major preparation for an intense ritual.
  • Charity (p. 364):
    OK, so there is a little bit of redemption of this character on this page :)
  • emotions feeding others (p. 373):
    this is actually a comment that applies to a lot of other situations – for instance, bullies and sadists feed off the emotions of their victims (which is why I am so fundamentally against the victims of bullying telling the bully how the bullying is making the victim feel – it is rewarding the bully, for ****’s sake!
    Internet trolls also get off on the emotions they cause.
  • the downside of pop culture (p. 389):
    I’ve posted a few times about tapping in to the thought forms being created by the interest in Harry Potter (it’s less of an advantage now – pop consciousness has moved on, and is no longer feeding those thought forms as well) – for instance, using the Expecto Patronum spell as an actual magickal protective spell. This page gives the downside of that – generation of fear by horror movies.
    This consideration is based purely on the energetic aspects of these: there is a whole debate about whether the psychology of movies and games causes, exacerbates or brings out (all the same, as far as I am concerned, from the point of view of impact – but each would be approached differently in terms of seeking a cure) things like violence.
  • friends are true family (p. 393):
    I agree. Some relatives are also friends, and thus count as true family.
  • Deities (p. 40):
    this page has some neochristian rubbish from Charity – who is therefore back to being irredeemable, as far as I am concerned :) – and comments about Deities from harry that I disagree with. I don’t consider that they are less active – just less acknowledged / noticed. I consider many Deities exist to
    bring something important into physical existence: as long as that characteristic is in existence, the Deity is doing Her/His/Its job. Whether we know it or not is immaterial to what is actually happening – although if we know and ignore, that is just downright rudeness.
  • the fae being affected by iron (p. 415):
    this is something mentioned from several sources (one of the books my partner has given me, as a gift, is a reprint of some old stories on this and other aspects of British fae mythology). That, the stories about
    kryptonite affecting Superman, and the real world existence of allergies – some being life-threatening - are all worth thinking about: what affects us adversely - and powerfully so – psychically and spiritually? How can we minimise exposure to them? Can we develop an immunity to them? In my case, lack of contact with natural energies is one such aspect; in terms of active influences – well, I’ll keep those vulnerabilities to myself :)
  • having no fear left, and Summer Court at heart of Winter Court (p. 423):
    in the specific instance given on this page, Harry Dresden is able to overcome a phobophage because he has no fear left. It makes sense in that specific context, particularly the Teddy Roosevelt comment about “the only thing to fear is fear itself”, but in real life, fear is a more complex matter – and can have some survival value. (Also, if you don’t have fear to overcome, you’re not brace / courageous – just “fearless”, which is not necessarily a good thing.)
    Also, I see the Seelie / Summer Court vs. Unseelie / Winter Court aspect of the fae as being more like the dynamic balance and endless renewal of the
    Taijitu than explosive opposites akin to the reaction typically attributed to matter and antimatter.
  • orphans vs. kids in families (p. 454):
    this is a moment when Harry, who was orphaned at an early age, reflects on the advantages kids raised in families have. Well, if they are genuinely BPM loving families, yes … BUT Harry has accomplished an enormous amount, despite NOT having been raised in a loving family environment - and some families are downright abusive.
  • the White Council (towards the end of the book):
    the whole White Council concept irritates me – as it is meant to, by Mr Butcher. Their attitudes are questionable (although a case for their views will be presented in subsequent books), but their implementation of it is highly flawed – it is simplistic, liable to personal and political abuse, and needs – well, it needs more of the real world justice concepts.
  • not a relationship of equals (p. 534):
    YES! A thousand times, YES!!!
  • sex and energetic overload (p. 537):
    yes, some sex can cause an energetic overload, although the vast majority is actually beneficial. Masturbation is also beneficial from an energetic point of view – the warning against “solo explorations” is not correct. 

 Keywords:
abuse of power, anger, artificer, authentic presence, blackmail, breathing exercises, clairvoyance, colour, consequences, control, courage, death, Deities, demons, denial, discrimination, divination,dreams, dynamic balance, ectomancy, emotions, energy work, ethics, expectation, evidence, evil, faery, faith, family, fear, fight or flight or network and nurture, flaming, folk lore, friends,garlic, governance, healing, hypocrisy, ignorance, informed decisions, law, levels, limits, knowledge, magic, magickal techniques and styles, meditation, mediumship, metaphysical mass, moral courage, mythology,necromancy, pain, phobophage, possession, power, preparation, proof, prophecy, protection, psychic attack, racism, responsibility, rites, rituals, sacrifice, scepticism, Seelie,society, spells, survival, survival after death, teaching, tests, thaumaturgy, transmigration, understanding, Unseelie, vampire, vulnerabilities, zombie, Valkyrie, visualisation, ward, time magic,