Showing posts with label training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label training. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 September 2025

Post No. 3,251 - Let people use the skills you hired them to use

Something I have often argued for is using people for the skills you hired them for, instead trying to force, for instance, business development people to do technical work (completely different set of skills), or to force technical experts to be project managers (a completely different worldview, in many cases), or think project managers can fill in for anything they are supervising (which has been disastrous at times). 

Some amathiacs - not only in the business world - have a misbegotten fantasy that everyone should be an expert in every field (that was a particular flaw in far too many psychic/spiritual/Wiccan groups I have been in), which is arrogant, clueless, and illogical (or, worse, based on the human incompetence of assuming things will be easy for everyone else because it is easy for you as a result of your familiarity, training,  personal characteristics, and, too often, unacknowledged privilege). 

I have now seen someone else make that same sort of argument: 



Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  




 

Friday, 5 July 2024

Post No. 2,826 - Training: techniques or ethics first?

I’m going to oversimplify and apply the irony/sarcasm sauce in spades here (with a dash of “mix your metaphor”) and say that many martial artsy - sci fi-y - Star Warsy films seem to be based on people being trained in techniques first and ethics/cautions coming later (perhaps to hook people in with easy/quick/cheap interest?), with everyone being surprised when a recruit or two loses their way and starts using those techniques to do harm ... 

That’s why responsible occult/psychic/spiritual groups in the real world do  it  the  other  way  round: ethics first, including tests to prove commitment, and then get into techniques.

My monthly reminder about training exercises includes reminders about ethical matters - including that we are all subject to the laws of the land we live in. 

When I was running groups IRL, I did my best to exclude people who were ethically questionable (I missed a couple who were motivated by desire for relationships) and accepted that I would not get as many students as I wished - to the absolute bewilderment of some people who couldn't shift their thinking out of a market-it-deeply-if-it-could-be-good-because-lots-of-near-enough-people-is-wortj-a-few-Darth-Vaders - but that is NOT the case. 

If people have problems with a few initial tests of their ethical sincerity, bad luck for them. I have a moral obligation to do what I can to make sure those I am teaching are unlikely to do harm - which is not going to always work in this imperfect world, but I should be trying to the best of my ability - especially as many of the scenarios in movies could have been prevented with even a little common sense.

In the human rights field, there is a saying that the standard you walk by is the standard you are prepared to accept. 

In the technology field there is the saying FOMO (fear of missing out), which I suspect is why those people I mentioned above were unable to shift their minds out of their dangerous and irresponsible mindset.

In the psychic world, we should be guided by FOMDV - fear of making Darth Vaders ... 

I accept reincarnation; if people are not ready in this life, they will have an opportunity in future lives - or after death, as our learning/growing/development continues then. 


PS - to put some context into the issue of spiritual (NOT mundane or legal) authority, below is a diagram I was preparing as part of preparing a revised QAQC manual for regression-rescue circles (which I didn’t complete, and likely won’t). The terminology is a bit dated - I now use BPM, rather than BPF.



 



If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram. 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here. 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  




 

Friday, 1 April 2016

Post No. 848E - the sixth set of keywords

Owing to Blogger's limits on keywords, when I have a lot I have to post them in batches. This is the sixth lot of keywords for this post.

Keywords: 
thought / thinking, time magic, training, uncooperative, understanding, Valkyrie, values, vampire, vortex /vortices, ward, words,

Thursday, 1 December 2011

Post No. 343 - Thoughts from a work trip

I started this post while I was travelling for work. It was just a couple of days, but it can be boring in a motel room far away from home and all that makes life worthwhile. Now, I know I could and should use the time productively (physical exercise, do breathing exercises or meditate), but I'm too exhausted to push myself that much. My mind has, however, been active - has been speculating, so here are a few random "thoughts from a work trip".

Firstly, I've actually come across some comments recently to the effect that we, as a species, are vain. Now, that actually also applies to other species as well (e.g., some birds evolve brilliant plumage in one sex to attract mates - how's that for vanity, eh? Course, I've heard similar comments about humans - namely, that women evolved ""hemispherical" breasts [not found naturally in other species, this person claimed] when humans started to stand upright, to replace the turn on to male ancestors of our species this claim was COMPLETELY heterenormative, by the way], apparently shared with primates, of "hemispherical buttocks"), but in the case of humans, we can use our capacity for thought to consider that further, rather than just being blind followers of fashion.

In our case, I think this behaviour may not be wholly a case of vanity: I think it is, at least in some cases, more about fear - fear that just simply being ourself will not be enough to attract a mate, or even friendship/acceptance/success in work/etc.

I find that quite sad - and flawed. I personally would rather be without artifices, miss "hooking up" with people who are so shallow and superficial that they could be "caught" by such vanities, and find someone real to have a REAL relationship with (as I have, in fact, done :) ).

This thought extended into how fear underlies a lot of what we do in so many ways, especially fear of social disapproval. I cop some of that through looking very butch and having a deep voice (actually, I cop a LOT of that).

I'll leave that thought there, and move on to another.

I think I recall posting comments about how behaviours can be, more or less, higher or lower expressions of something. Hence, for instance, Bhakti Yoga, the path of devotion, is where one is supposed to be devoted to one's Guru, and gradually evolve that into devotion to Deity. My explanation of that is Westernised: I say that love for one's family is a lead up to love for all humanity, which is a lead up to love for all creation.

Similarly, I suspect the dedication that some people have for the company they work for is a lower expression of dedication to a "noble cause". Great people like Mohandas K. Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Bishop Desmond Tutu and Martin Luther King Jr. "served their apprenticeship" in the development of their skills (including their capacity to lead and inspire people) somewhere, possibly a somewhere that is the long distant equivalent of those who, in this day and age, are sacrificing themselves to ensure their company makes a profit? (I, incidentally, have a problem when such sacrifices are forced upon the unwilling!)

I still think such "salary people" (to borrow from a Japanese term - and, while I'm at it, look up the Japanese word "karoshi") need to get a broader focus and stop being so materialistic, but the desire to be of service, including the desire to be part of something greater than the individual, is something that is too often ignored in this age, the age where little people think they are as good as great people. This was an aspect that was discussed in "Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth" by Stuart Holroyd, about the alleged contact between aliens and Andrija Puharich, Phyllis V. Sclemmer and Sir John Whitmore, when considering the possible motivations of the three people (i.e., the events described in that book may have been a case of being misled because of a desire to be of service to a greater cause, rather than an attempt to commit fraud, as so many "Skeptics" seem to assume is the only possible motivation - and, for the record, Holroyd discounted both fraud and being misled through idealism :) ).

Now, on salary people, this work trip has been with a young engineer who is my protege: the company I work for wants me to pass on everything I know to her before I retire (or get sacked?). Well, it's good that they're thinking about succession planning, but they've put all their eggs in one basket, and there is a lot of maturing that has to be done before this very talented, capable young woman is able to fill my shoes. In fact, that is what I am finding on these trips, just how many bits of knowledge I've put away in various brain cells (then there is the theory that, when the brain cells are full, at around about middle age, the storage goes to one's middle/hips :) ). What is important here, in this situation of teaching, is the receptivity of the student. If this young woman was like many teenagers and other people I know, she would think she knows it all, and there would therefore be absolutely no purpose in listening to an old fuddy-duddy like me. However, she isn't like that. She actually comes from a culture that teaches respect for elders, but, in fact, she is often too respectful - it can even be a struggle to get her to say when she doesn't understand, as she wishes to be polite.

There are plenty of sayings about not casting seed upon barren ground ... I take such sayings well and truly to heart, which can be difficult when you're keen to be of service (which, incidentally, is the reason I chose the day job that I have - to be of service to the community, which one of my uni acquaintances refused to believe ... and my bosses, of course, think I chose it to make them a profit!). I recently had someone who was very surprised by feeling healing energy I was channelling to her, but she has not followed up with any questions.

Finally, I'll end with a couple of links that I've been wanting to put up for a while. Firstly:
and next, an example of what not to do:

PS - a little trivia for you: apparently, according to my dear partner, I have been practising some of my magical chants as I snore - the snoring sounds very like the chanting, in other words. Just as well I don't have to share rooms on these trips!

Love, light, hugs and blessings

Gnwmythr
(pronounced "new-MYTH-ear")

This post's photo is yet to be posted.

Tags: Bhakti, evolution, Gandhi, insecurity, Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr, materialism, society, Stuart Holroyd, training, Tutu, vanity,

First published: Thorsdagr, 1st December, 2011

Last edited: Thursday, 1st December, 2011