I recently found the following interesting and/or useful, and am posting them here in case anyone else does as well.
- Firstly, a terrible tragedy which, IMO, shows the VITAL IMPORTANCE OF GETTING CONVENTIONAL PROFESSIONAL HELP (MENTAL HEALTH, IN THIS CASE) WHEN NEEDED!!! Better education on this may also be needed to counter misinformation: “Woman says she ‘didn’t understand mental health’ before daughter experiencing acute psychosis killed another child” https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jun/17/woman-says-she-didnt-understand-mental-health-before-daughter-in-acute-psychosis-killed-another-child-ntwnfb
- “When the Screen Holds Your Secret” https://breakingthesilence001.substack.com/p/when-the-screen-holds-your-secret “Reflections on Disclosure Day and what it stirred ... I’m still processing.” This is easily the best comment about the movie I have yet come across AND ALSO “An A-Team for the Orbs. No One for the People” https://mazetometanoia.substack.com/p/an-a-team-for-the-orbs-no-one-for “Every UAP report begins as a frightened person describing what they saw. Avi Loeb’s new science council has no one trained to listen.” This is excellent, and the points are vital. In the human rights / advocacy field there is a saying: “nothing about us without us”, and I have often thought that needs to be used more widely. It would actually fit here, if the events are viewed properly - starting, as described by the article, with the person. That is easier said than done. When I worked in engineering, eventually public consultations were introduced, but initially engineers thought - arrogantly - that they could do the consultations, but, in that era, engineers were taught procedures, rather than true critical thinking, and lacked basic emotional competence (two skills I would to see taught more widely, much better, and from much younger ages), and it took a few abject failures here (in the 1990s) before they got out of the way and let the true experts in. The article mentions nurses. Here nurse training shifted to exclusively university-based a few years ago (possibly at the insistence of people like 1990s engineers?), and the human side of their training seems to me (based on my unfortunate experiences) to have been less effective, but the ability to use those skills has also been impaired by cost cutting (“efficiency“) measures. I hope that if the additional roles are implemented those who are making any decisions about resourcing have the integrity and competence to listen to and accept the recommendations of the human skills experts. ALSO SEE “This is How Disclosure Disappears” https://asirpjournal.substack.com/p/this-is-how-disclosure-disappears “A UAP Science Advisory Council assembled by blog post and revised under public scrutiny. The demands were for the files; the answer is a committee. The danger is substitution. ... Discovery Is Not Disclosure” AND ALSO “After Grusch's "Sentient Plasmoid" Remark, Scientists Explore an Unusual Possibility” https://unknowncountry.com/headline-news/after-gruschs-sentient-plasmoid-remark-scientists-explore-an-unusual-possibility/ “After David Grusch suggested that some nonhuman intelligences may take the form of “sentient plasmoid life,” a pair of papers by Harvard astrophysicist Dr. Rudolph Schild examines whether organized plasma phenomena in Earth’s atmosphere could represent an unconventional form of life.” AND ALSO “The Real Disclosure Day: Scientists Revise the Rules for Announcing Extraterrestrial Intelligence” https://unknowncountry.com/headline-news/the-real-disclosure-day-scientists-revise-the-rules-for-announcing-extraterrestrial-intelligence/ “New international protocols outline how evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be verified, announced, and managed—and reaffirm that no one should respond on behalf of humanity without global consultation.” The last point, about global collaboration, is vital BUT ALSO While Whitley Strieber has done a massive amount of good for the experiencer and, more generally, the UFO/UAP/ET fields - including the bad experiences, every now and then he does something which makes me wary of him - such the praise at https://substack.com/@whitleystrieber1/note/c-273311526 for the older form of the (religious [neochristian]) “Western mind”, which, as an Aboriginal woman whose people were subjected to genocide, a member of multiple minority groups subjected to the abuses of the patriarchy and capitalism and neoliberalism, and a human staring at the early devastation of the climate crisis, the so-called “Western mind”, a euphemism for “Western civilisation”, IMO, is not something to be taken as inherently or predominantly or uncritically “good” - it had its good points, but it also had slavery, colonialism, industrialisation, and the destruction of human, social, and environmental capital in Indigenous systems which created things like Yindyamarra, Yindyamarra Winhanganya, Dadirri, and Ngumbaadyil.
Finally, for the sake of clarity: my view is that the majority of extraterrestrials visiting this planet are part of the Gardeners of the Universe, who have the intention of serving Life (including the sort of activist intervention used by First Peoples here to turn this continent into a park for tens of thousands of years), and most western academics/investigators/experiencers struggle to comprehend that because they (1) lack the benefit of Eastern and/or Indigenous thinking, and (2) have been too warped by the patriarchy-capitalism-neoliberalism troika. When they get over an excessive focus on tech and physical evidence (some focus is necessary and good) and look at consciousness (including a whispered hint of personal/spiritual growth - of betterment as individual people) they often start to work more effectively with the complexities and nuances of the Gardeners of the Universe + nonBPM extraterrestrials + other BPM & nonBPM “NHIs” (i.e., non-human intelligences - which I point out includes a lot of sentient Earth-evolved life) and the multiple BPM & nonBPM interactions that can and DO occur between those groups and the various sub-groups of humans ... AND those interactions can and do show the need of a number of those ETs to improve how they do those interactions to be more respectful and empathic;
- “Should we stop and stare?” https://youtu.be/4jZZLAUHy7U “We’re told to produce results, meet targets, hit deadlines and keep moving. We are taught that activity is a virtue and reflection is a waste of time. I think that is one of the biggest mistakes modern society makes. In this video, I use William Henry Davies’ famous poem Leisure to explore why creativity, imagination, innovation and good judgement all require something that our culture increasingly discourages: time to stop and think.”
- “Why are we wasting so much human potential?” https://youtu.be/ug5IXLLUh8o “Every day, people with ability, creativity and ambition are prevented from becoming who they could be. Not because they lack talent, but because they lack opportunity. For generations, poverty, discrimination and privilege have limited people’s chances in life. Many never receive the education they need. Many are forced into work that leaves no room for personal development. Many find their ambitions fading because society has decided that simply having a job is enough. The result is a loss that we can never measure. We cannot count the discoveries that were never made. We cannot count the businesses that were never created. We cannot count the works of art that were never produced. And we cannot count the lives that might have been transformed if people had been given a fair chance. This is not an argument for equality of outcome. People have different ambitions, talents and aspirations. The issue is whether everyone has the opportunity to realise their potential and become who they are capable of being. Too often, the answer is no. In this video, I explore how poverty, inequality, discrimination and privilege continue to waste human talent in Britain today, and why a politics of care would instead seek to nurture potential wherever it exists. A society that wastes talent makes itself poorer. The question is simple: how much talent are we wasting, and what could we achieve if everyone was given the chance to flourish?” This applies elsewhere as well. As Stephen Jay Gould said: “I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.”
- “What does being ‘trauma-informed’ actually mean?” https://theconversation.com/what-does-being-trauma-informed-actually-mean-281882
On neurodivergence and associated matters:
- “ADHD: Why a Whole Generation of Women are Finally Recognising They’re Hunters” https://www.hunterinafarmersworld.com/p/why-a-whole-generation-of-women-is “Adult ADHD diagnoses are surging among women. The standard explanation misses the point.”
- “Five Reasons Doctors Are Afraid to Diagnose Fibromyalgia” https://youtu.be/IBYq_b2r7Z4 “Getting a fibromyalgia diagnosis shouldn't feel like begging to be believed — but for millions of patients, that's exactly what it feels like. In this video, Dr. Michael Lenz, MD breaks down the 5 real reasons your doctor may be hesitating to diagnose your fibromyalgia — from gaps in medical training to outright disbelief in the condition's reality — and gives you the exact language, diagnostic criteria, and scientific evidence you need to walk into your next appointment empowered”
- “The Autism Executive Function Access Matrix™ (AEFAM)” https://theautismdoctor.substack.com/p/the-autism-executive-function-access “A 6-domain framework for identifying which areas need strengthening, an accompanying quiz, & specific strategies that help.”
On society, governance, human rights, etc:
- “Why do older people support the far-right?” https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/06/14/why-do-older-people-support-the-far-right/ “... this generation was promised something very different. It was told that economic growth, rising asset values, private pensions, home ownership and expanding consumer choice would provide security in old age. Instead, many now face deteriorating health, growing insecurity, declining public services, loneliness and a sense that the future they expected has not arrived. The result is disappointment, and disappointment readily turns to anger when people feel that they have been misled”
- “At the Press Club, the real world arrived” https://redbridgeintel.substack.com/p/at-the-press-club-the-real-world “At the National Press Club, Pauline Hanson finally put her ideas on the table. Every one of them attacked the voters that have provided her with the late surge in support.”
My recent article(s) on SubStack:
- “It’s all connected” https://musingsofgnwmythr.substack.com/p/its-all-connected “We need to humbly work together”
My recent article(s) on Patreon:
- “DEI ... or a short cut? (1,082 words; 7 minutes)” https://www.patreon.com/KayWhiteCoachingServices/posts/dei-or-short-cut-161253701 My work experience in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) began in the early 1990s, witnessing progress exemplified by better laws like the Australian Sex Discrimination Act. This legal advancement was paired with a change in societal perceptions, akin to the shift in attitudes toward drink driving. DEI has seen a sequence of improvements, moving, for example, from awareness of racism to anti-racism initiatives, and sexism issues have evolved from employment discrimination to addressing domestic violence. The prioritisation of issues in legislation is often influenced by activism and perceived urgency, which may not reflect the community's greatest needs. Additionally, social change faces resistance, prompting advocates and opponents to adapt their approaches continually, influencing the effectiveness of future DEI initiatives. One significant reason for resistance to change is discomfort with difference, which can have detrimental effects such as perpetuating harm to minority groups, obstructing objective consideration of issues, and hindering effective communication of valid points. While some aspects may lie outside the workplace DEI framework, effective progressive DEI enhances productivity, reduces staff wear and tear, improves retention, mitigates legal risks, and attracts talent. However, addressing individual discomfort with difference directly would violate personal integrity and is not feasible within workplace policies. Thus, discomfort with difference remains largely outside the purview of workplace DEI, despite the potential to alleviate some suffering if it were addressed.
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
Gnwmythr
teaching the "good" (balanced positive and spiritually mature)
safe ways to counter the "bad" (out of balance, spiritually immature)
If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon,
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi
Any and all support will be greatly appreciated, and will aid me in continuing this work
Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).
#PsychicABetterWorld and may all that I do be of value and actively BPM used for and by the nonphysical BPM because #KindnessIsThePoint
Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear
Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.
Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative
Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
.jpg)
