Showing posts with label circle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label circle. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 October 2016

Post No. 934 - A Few Quick Thoughts on Casting Circles

These days, most people I know use the four quarters when casting circles, which comes to us through the Hermetic tradition (via Rosicrucianism). It wasn't always that number - the Druids are thought to have used earth (Calas), Sea (Gwyar) and Air /Sky (Nwyvre), which I first came across - I think - via the Druid Journal website/blog. This raises the possibility that we can work with a different number of directions - for instance, although I often don't give them a particular attribution, I include above and below when casting circles, to help make sure the protection is three dimensional (and I also do this on multiple levels of reality, but that's a complication for another post, perhaps :) ... although your could read Katharine Kerr's Deverry series for some [fictional] illustrations of that).

There is a balance to be considered here:
  • personalising the casting makes it connect more strongly to oneself, but 
  • using systems that others have established enables one to draw upon the strength and energy of others' work.

Probably it is better to use established systems whilst learning and developing one's strength, and personalise it when one has the strength, communication with one's BPM  Guides, and meditation ability to gain useful and accurate knowledge to be able to make a decision about how many directions to use. (How long is that? Depends on the person, how quickly they learn, how much they work at it, etc. For most people I've seen, I'd think about personalising their circle casting after two or three years of regular and well-motivated work.)

One thing most people can do fairly early on is to focus on drawing in the attributes, rather than the characteristics. As an example, East is often Air, and possibly the archangel Raphael if you use that sort of attribution. You can focus on visualising the columns of light or the archangel - and, in fact, have to when learning, as part of developing one's psychic muscles - but one can, once competent at the basic visualisation, extend that to seeing the attribute(s) as an energy (with the appropriate colour) flowing in and either hardening the circular shell, if doing a protective ritual, against nonBPM incursions of thought (distraction, etc), or flooding the area with BPM thought abilities (concentration/focus, inspiration, etc) if doing an invocation casting of circle.

Just a thought to ponder :) 

 

WLNGRHDMT


If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram and Mastodon. 

Finally, remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, and to mind our Mӕgan.




 

 

Sunday, 3 July 2016

Post No. 893 - Videos

Some time ago I posted a "video" (it's really more audio, than video) of using some spells from Harry Potter for protection. I've now come up with a slightly better version:


I have also developed pseudo-videos (more audios!) of opening, closing and daily protection prayers.






I also created a pseudo-video (audios)of the monthly Hope, Peace, Love and Prosperity Spell, but as that is a whopping 18 Mb in size, dithered before getting it uploaded here ... SIGH ... may be time to get a presence on YouTube ...



(By the way, I did try doing this through the more widespread method of taping myself reading this out, but (a) my snoz is WAY too prominent, and (b) I think it is handy to be able to read the words at the same time, and my computer skills don't extend that far ... yet :) Oh, and I won't be giving up my day job :D ) 


Friday, 1 April 2016

Post No. 848 - Some minor, mostly magickally focused comments on “The Dresden Files” – Part Four (Books 13 – 15, and “Side Jobs”)

Other posts in this series:

Book No. 13 – Ghost Story
(ROC, 2012, first pub. 2012, ISBN 978-0-451-46407-1)
As a spirit rescuer, I find aspects of this book frustrating, so I tend not to reread it as much as the others. It is useful to compare this book to the film “Just Like Heaven”.
  • what happens after death (p. 2):
    see
    Victor Zammit’s website, the century and a half of spiritualist experiences, Lobsang Rampa’s books, and a few millennia of mystics …
  • “there are things out here” (pp. 7 – 8):
    parts of the lower astral are not particularly pleasant.
  • eating / drinking after death (p. 11):
    a mistake some people make.
  • concept of being stuck because of an irregularity (p. 14):
    in terms of the this-verse, this is basically rubbish. There are lots of reasons people get
    earthbound, and that ain’t one of ‘em (I’ve written elsewhere about this). In terms of this story, more is yet to be revealed on the matter.
  • passing through things (p. 23):
    there are actually a range of experiences and perceptions for this.
  • earthbound people continuing their routines (p. 23):
    yes, this is very true.
  • wraiths and the devouring of memories (pp. 26 – 28):
    this is the way it is in the Dresden-verse, but not in the this-verse.
  • ghost dust (p. 34):
    interesting concept. Hmm … I wonder … hmmm … nah – I’ll stick to my sigils and wards :)
  • lemurs (pp. 40 – 45):
    pronounced lay-MOORS. Wikipedia spells it with an “e”, and says this was the term for
    restless, vengeful dead. See also manes, which crops up on pp. 68 - 69. This has been another of those enjoyable research episodes inspired by Mr Butcher’s greater knowledge of mythology.
  • great example of mediumship (pp. 54 – 57).
  • what ghosts are (p. 59):
    those comments do not apply to the this-verse. To simplify a little, “ghosts” can be earthbound entities (which have intelligence and can sensibly interact with people and events), thought forms (which do not interact or vary their routine), or etheric shells as they dissipate (generally in the case of someone who died with a lot of vitality). People visiting deliberately after they have already passed over are not ghosts. Have a look at sites like the Canadian indigenous paranormal investigation series
    “The Other Side” for more.
  • shades are only a small part of oneself, the part with something to resolve (pp. 67 – 68):
    although it is possible for us to project part of ourselves for various purposes (generally learned in more advanced training), the concept that a shade disappears after it has resolved an issue does not apply in the this-verse.
  • effects of thinking on interactions with the astral (p. 70):
    great discussion and fantastic – amusing - example.
  • impact of wards (p. 74):
    which is why I’m not too worried about not having ghost dust.
  • piecemeal wards (pp. 76 – 77):
    what an interesting idea. I’ll have to see if I can work out a way to do this – generally I do the same as harry and create a solid wall.
  • being overwhelmed by memories (p. 93):
    I haven’t come across in any of the entities I’ve rescued in the last three and a bit decades.
  • great example of good mediumship (pp. 104 – 107).
  • Mister “shoulder blocking” Harry (p. 108):
    I’d like to see that :)
  • Harry being hard on himself regarding his training of Molly (p. 121):
    I actually consider Harry is being unreasonably hard on himself. If he had had the time, he would have taught what she needed to know – gently, but effectively.
  • co-opting energy (p. 131):
    very good and useful comments – for both Dresden-verse and this-verse.
  • sunrise obliterating ghosts (p. 153):
    ghosts have actually been seen in daylight. I consider the psychic noisiness of normal human activities is why people don’t notice them during daylight (it is much quieter psychically when the other little darlin’s are tucked in for beddy-bys – that is why so much serious psychic work tends to be done late at night). The sort of energy effects being proposed would only apply to thought forms and etheric shells, and to a limited extent.
  • moving physical objects (p. 171):
    this is hard enough to do psychically when one has a physical body; when one doesn’t, there’s an extra level of difficulty involved. However, it can be done … emotions can potentially help, and practice and training is likely to help (if delivered competently – which means “matched to the students learning style(s) and needs).
  • not being able to communicate with the living (p. 193):
    this is one of the greatest frustrations of the earthbound. They may think they are being ignored.
  • Murphy’s anger when Harry tries to protect the young people who shot at them (pp. 210 – 215):
    is completely justifiable. People did, in fact (in that part of the Dresden-verse) die, and the kids firing the guns blindly from the street have to accept the responsibility for that. This is a situation where BPM justice has to be both done, and seen to be done.
  • guilt / conflict of conscience, and the harm that this can cause to mental health (p. 212 – 213).
  • Mort (Mortimer, the ectomancer) had been saving Harry from things he didn’t know about, just as Harry had been saving Chicago from things Chicago didn’t about (p. 222):
    interesting – and a perspective that is well worth considering, as it saves us from arrogance.
  • why ghostly Dresden has no magickal abilities (p, 243):
    this is an intriguing aspect of this book.
    In the this-verse, most rescues are of cooperatives, and the focus is on emotional issues. However, when uncooperatives are being rescued, they definitely have magickal clout. (I was told of an earthbound child who, when he found he was invisible, started playing ranks such as moving chairs, so cooperatives can do some “magickal” acts as well.)
  • story of training with Justin (pp. 225 – 231):
    this covered a few points:
      - don’t be mediocre – agreed, but don’t have to be the world’s best, either,
      - work hard – yes, but kids also need to play for emotional and mental wellbeing and development – as do, to some extent, adults,
      - rewards – so long as they’re not excessive or too easily won, and one watches for any tendency on the part of the child to expect rewards, are OK,
      - age appropriateness – was something Justin clearly knew nothing about,
      - corporal punishment: no, as done by Justin is totally wrong.
  • using memories as power (p. 232):
    this is, in a sense, a variation of the learning to get by without tools issue. It was interesting that Harry mentions (p. 234) he had been working several times a year on doing some magickal work without tools. Several times a year I set up circles using only visualisation, or with my back facing outwards.
  • Lea’s teaching of Harry (p. 247):
    yes, she did share a part in Harry’s development, but I have a stricter definition of teaching, and her approaches don’t meet my definition. I tend to view life as the source of hard lessons, if they are to be faced by students of mine: I’ll work as effectively as I can – and throwing them in at the deep end and pushing them under has never been useful or effective in the teaching situations I’ve been in. Mind you, life – particularly that part of it associated with my day job – has done that quite a few times, and I can see the benefit of it in terms of that, BUT … if someone comes to me suffering and injured from psychic attack, they need safety and healing first, not to be pushed into clearing links etc (although I get annoyed if they had passed a chance to learn those skills beforehand). It’s a bit like being a battlefield medic coming across someone with a severed limb: you don’t start explaining how to use an arterial clamp, you just do it, and later, if they survive, you might talk to them about caring for their wound, etc – and, if they decide to change career and get into medical work, then you can teach them how to use an arterial clamp :)
  • unintended consequences (pp. 264 – 265):
    Harry was in the grip of powerful emotions at the time he is reflecting on, but it always important to try to think things through. Sometimes things crop up that one hadn’t thought of: you learn from that, and then have a wider capacity for possible options /outcomes in future situations.
    That’s life.
  • analysis of anger related thoughts and emotions (pp. 292 – 296):
    a bit basic, but reasonable for all that.
  • making spells last (pp. 299 – 30):
    good comments about investing effort, and anchoring energy to objects. However, I am – as I’ve mentioned previously :) – not so convinced it is sunrise that does the degrading (particularly if the spell is of the same type of energy): I think the soup of energies we live in from peoples thoughts and emotions (broadcast in HD, owing to the lack of closing of auras) does most of the damage. It’s just that more people are far more active during the day.
  • feedback through sensing as a way of developing psychism (p. 305):
    this is quite true – in fact it is the basis of a dowsing exercise I use to teach people (which, if I haven’t already posted, I will … one day). However, in terms of only some people being sensitive enough to do this, that’s not correct: one can develop that sensing. As an example, I’ve posted an amusing story about me being a “lift goddess” before. Well, now that I’m aware of it, that doesn’t happen automatically, but I am learning to judge that sensory signal which indicates where the next lift is going to come – by making a lot of tries, being right with some, wrong with others, and carefully analysing myself to discover the difference. Mistakes matter, good people :)
  • as a general comment, I enjoy the backstory we get through the memories “theme” / idea.
  • good adaptation to a powerful attack (p. 325).
  • ghost are just memories (p. 343):
    no, see previous comments.
  • the Akashic Record (pp. 343 – 344):
    this is effectively what is being described.
  • differences between soul and spirit (p. 376):
    oy vey. Everyone has their own definition, I think – and really there is no-one to say whose is right or wrong. It’s really a case of torch vs. flashlight. Just get over yourselves people, define what you mean, and then mentally substitute the words when others use a different one (provided they do likewise).
  • angel of death (p. 395(:
    yes! Good (but the stuff on p. 396 is basically neochristian rubbish).
  • energising spell (p. 428):
    good example!
  • wards (p. 431):
    no, they don’t need a threshold. They don’t even need to be fixed to a physical place – many of mine are in my aura, for instance.
  • in the nonphysical, nonphysical power is the same as physical power here is – real, solid, and with impact (pp. 461 – 462):
    YES!
  • mental war between Molly and “the Corpsetaker”:
    this is beyond the ability of anyone I know, but … it is the nonphysical. This experience is framed by the thinking of those in it.
  • simplicity of good vs. evil in Star Wars (p. 541):
    I agree – it is simplistic (the original TV series Star Trek was better on that aspect), and it can be refreshing – a bit of escapist entertainment.
  • use of ectomancy (p. 553 – 554):
    these are interesting examples, but they strike me as being a little bit too much like a ceremonialist finding and binding a spirit to their will.
  • revelations about Mortimer (pp. 553 – 557):
    very interesting, particularly from the point of story and character development. I will be interested to see what happens when Mort next crops up in a Dresden book.
  • Chapter 50 is mostly neochristian-based stuff, so of no interest to me, and, in my opinion, of questionable accuracy in terms of what happens in the this-verse.
Book No. 14 – Cold Days
(ROC, 2012, ISBN 978-0-451-46440-8)
I particularly enjoyed that the island and spirit Demonreach are featured in this book.
  • the alleged need to “remember” Deities and the fae (p. 18):
    this is actually irrelevant to their nature and their existence, in the this-verse. Thinking otherwise is just human arrogance.
  • changes made by the Winter Knight’s mantle:
    this is a theme (which Mr Butcher has commented he doesn’t plan – and that, based on my limited experience and comments by others, I consider is probably true – of most writers) – as another example, Thomas vs. his vampiric nature. They’re both examples of trying to use emotions, rather than allowing emotions use you. However, the control is based around fear of doing something “bad”, rather than aiming to transform and/or integrate such into one’s whole being – which is a bit of a theme in Tibetan Buddhism as I experienced and lived it. (Another example of this them may yet, I suspect, turn out to be Ebenezer vs. his “Blackstaff”.)
  • Kris Kringle’s comments about “mythical” figures changing (p. 39):
    very true. After all, before
    Odin was the All-Father, Týr was (I was interested to recently read of Gaius Mucius Scaevola, aspects of whose story are similar to that of Týr – which reminds of this article, about the dangerous state of the Mosul Dam, which also mentions “the Old Testament in its final form is a product of and a response to the Babylonian exile” and refers to similarities between Babylnian and Old testament legends), and, if neochristianity hadn’t stuffed things up, by now Thor might be …
  • an easy, innate access to magick (p. 42):
    should be the aim of all who do magickal work.
  • a good conversation about sex and coercion (pp. 66 – 67).
  • an example of indirect psychic attack using a lifestyle vulnerability (p. 71).
  • the vulnerability of immortals on Hallowe’en (pp. 9  97):
    I don’t personally know any immortals in the sense used on the referenced pages. I promise to ask about this the very instant I meet such a being :) I’ll relay the answer – probably from at least three incarnations hence …
  • Harry has finally learned to share knowledge so people can make an informed choice (p. 122).
  • Thomas makes some excellent points (pp. 135 – 137.
  • much of the world is alive (p. 143):
    well … yes.
  • not understanding ancient magick (pp. 149 – 151):
    I can relate to this – it’s like not understanding advanced technology, or advanced mathematics (calculus is OK, but I got lost at the various transforms), or advanced social work concepts like
    “privilege”, or why people barrack for certain football teams – oh, wait. Oops – that one’s a mistake, ‘cos everyone is tolerant and forbearing with social differences of every single kind and people who speak different languages or have radically different social cultures (like a tribal person who has never met the 20th century and someone from an industrialised nation), aren’t they? Hmm?
  • revelation about the island (Chapter 16):
    this is an interesting concept – there are places in the lower astral like that.
  • the first Merlin helped set up the neochristian roman catholic church (p. 156):
    if the first Merlin did that (in any-verse), the first Merlin is a flippin’ idiot. He should have worked with the Arabs, who kept the light of civilisation going during the Dark Ages, and didn’t create the Crusades, Inquisition, etc (although they had their flaws as well).
  • waves going through time before and after an event (p. 171):
    yes, this is very true, and is one of the ways precognition works. As warnings get more frequent, one knows one is closer to the actual event.
  • water grounds out magick (p. 183):
    this is usually a reference to moving water, but I suppose a large body of water with lots of bits of movement would be similar. My experience – which includes shamanic journeys as part of the water – is otherwise, as I’ve written earlier in these reviews.
  • Ebenezer’s theory that humans are inherently conflicted and thus magick in the Dresden-verse stuffs things up (p. 184):
    humans are not necessarily inherently conflicted – many are, but not all – and, as one evolves spiritually, the conflict is resolved.
  • the Fomor:
    I recognise these entities – and the views about them – from Gaelic (Irish) mythology, which was written by the victors  -the
    Tuatha Dé Danann. The Wikipedia article on them includes the following: “However, their relationship with the Tuath Dé is complex and some of their members intermarry and have children. The Fomorians have thus been likened to the Jötnar of Norse mythology.”
    Now, if either the Fomor or the Jötnar are interpreted as natural powers, well – I like natural powers and the wildness of Nature, as I mentioned in various places, such as
    this post.
    If they’re interpreted as the original inhabitants of a place, they’re in the unenviable situation of the pre-Celtic inhabitants of Britain, the
    Etruscans just north of Ancient Rome, and indigenous people everywhere pre-colonisation.
  • an interesting qualification to the Dresden-verse’s threshold concept (pp. 197 – 198).
  • excellent comment about echoes through time by “Vadderung” (pp. 209 – 210).
  • good example of psychic attack and resistance (p. 223).
  • Outsiders (p. 227):
    I’m not familiar with an equivalent from the this-verse, but I am familiar with the concept that things can so different that one cannot comprehend them. One of the blogs I used to read had an excellent article about this: unfortunately, after a day or so of searching I was unable to find it, but I did come across some posts which might be interesting and sort of related – vaguely – to the concept I wanted to explain
    here, here and here.
  • karma, Harry, karma (p. 237).
  • bad things are inside everyone (p. 240):
    well, yes – that’s why shadow work is so important.
  • Butters’ theory about how the Winter Knight’s mantle works (p. 266):
    if you’ll excuse me while I do a
    Fringe and switch to my Dresden-verse typewriter, this doesn’t actually explain everything. There clearly are magickal effects involved as well, although this theory could well be part of it.
  • someone having your blood, or having done a blood ritual with you, is actually something that can be defended against – and one of the first points is to know that defence is possible. The next is to remember that blood cells have a life of around 90 days: at the worst, you might have to keep working for that long, although relative strength of you and your allies vs. person attacking you and their allies needs to be considered –and you do not need to know people who are your allies in such a working, as people attacking you in such a way have probably got a lot of people off side (p. 270).
  • good comments by Murphy about the transition to evil potentially being quite slow – and hence the need for shadow work, knowing oneself, and reflection (p. 273).
  • words are symbols; Will drives magick, and emotions often drive Will (p. 297  298):
    yes.
  • there are lots of interesting passages in this book about matters I’ve already commented on, but by this stage of the book I’m getting absorbed in the story, and so won’t interrupt my pleasure to make additional comments (generally).
  • interactions between the Fae and humans (pp. 326 – 328):
    interesting comments – well worth comparing to “the Guardians” in
    Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry series.
  • psychic “body heat” (p. 346):
    YES!
  • gender stereotypes (p. 347):
    rubbish, basically.
  • using a floating steel needle to penetrate blocks to a tracking spell (p. 356):
    interesting.
  • similar events happening in the same place (p. 366):
    I can quite accept this. In the sense that Harry is contemplating, which is about “bad guys”, this could be because (a) doing something “bad” where “bad” events have already been done allows one to build on that badness, (b) word of mouth would have spread and thus the “bad guys” would know about the place as somewhere that could be used for this sort of “badness”, (c) there may have been some “badness” originally – e.g., damaged ley lines, etc.
    On the other hand, every single aspect of this applies to “good” stuff as well – once you help to establish some niceness in a place, people keep coming to admire the niceness, and potentially add a little more, perhaps a share of the boost they received.
    This also shows why it is so hard to change something after a while, and thus it is important to, for instance, stop wars as early as possible, to prevent a build-up of that conflict energy.
  • shielding on one side only (p. 367):
    why? I’ve never even conceived of doing anything other than all round defence.
  • an example of psychic attack (p.415)
    and
      the use of logic to help overcome it (p. 416) (this also cropped up in
    Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry series, where an aspect of the training was to learn to think during dreams – which also reminds me of Joan Grant’s “Winged Pharaoh”)
    and
    the use of knowledge of oneself and one’s Will to also help overcome it (p. 417).
  • circles (p. 451):
    interesting thoughts about creatures that cross over circles, and I will think about the comment that this could be related to the quality of the circle.
  • the value of not always following instinct (p. 453).
  • the value of good training (p. 454).
  • Queen Mab is wrong when she claims that what Harry has done with Molly is no different to what Mab has. Even if there are similarities in aspects of this (and I contend that they are limited), there was no intent on Harry’s part. (p. 500)
  • a speculation (p. 506):
    does this open the door for a way that Harry can escape the mantle in a few years time, when his back has healed?
Book No. 15 – Skin Game
(ROC, 2014, ISBN 978-0-451-46439-2)
Back to ancient mythology – this time Ancient Greece. Woo hoo!
  • examples of types of uncooperatives (pp. 2 – 3);
  • good techniques for dealing with anger (imposition of rationality by doing times tables, etc) (p. 39);
  • naming something contains the emotion around it (p. 66):
    very true point: one could say this contains it in a box, or one could say it frames the issue and gives a way of viewing and analysing it – and no doubt there are many other ways of viewing this;
  • the problem of ricochets (p. 69):
    very good point.
  • example of astral travel (pp. 96 – 97):
    too many dreams that are actually are distorted recall of astral travel get written off by ****wits as messages to be interpreted, when they should just shut up and accept it for what it is. On the other hand, pp. 104 – 106 is all Harry’s subconscious not being very sub- …
  • sowing the seeds of discord in one’s opposition (pp. 104 – 106):
    this is done in the this-verse as well – there are groups of uncooperatives who need clearing, as well as individuals. The way Harry has gone about this is revealed later in the book to be particularly BPM, and that is the key to this.
  • save those doughnuts, Harry, save ‘em!
    (sorry – couldn’t resist :) )
  • reasons not to kill (p. 117):
    Harry’s reasons are all reasonable, but, if I was in that situation, I think I’d be happy with “it’s wrong”. If I needed more, I’d definitely respond to the “it’s not best in the long term”: I’ve spent too much time and effort sorting out nonBPM
    karma from past life nonBPM actions (and also enjoying the BPM karma from past life BPM actions).
  • Chapter 20:
    this chapter has a lot of personal insights, and presents a great example of what friendship is – real friendship, the sort that outweighs many blood ties.
  • analogy of getting pages on a phone for using the name of a Deity (p. 167):
    interesting. I’ll think about this – my first reaction, as a limited human being, is that it is plausible, but then, we’re talking about being who probably fundamentally don’t exist in the same way that I and you do, and thus this may not be an issue – which is something Harry discussed with Uriel in one of the earlier books (p. 514 of “Small Favor” [sic]).
  • this is one of the most hilarious twists to a story I have ever read (p.182).
  • don’t react to changes out of fear, and have faith in friends (p. 188 – 190):
    I agree with this up to a point – I don’t want to create unreasonable pressures on my friends, so I’d add a qualification of the legal sense of “reasonableness” to this.
  • use Earth magick to ground out attack (p. 197):
    this is an interesting idea. For me, Earth energies are peaceful, persistent – but they are also very grounding, inherently so. I will think about this … ;
  • establishing “like to like” connections for magickal (p. 207 – 209):
    interesting considerations.
  • Harry’s comment about the Genoskwa’s use of veils showing it does actually have fear / respect for / some consideration of what mortal authorities can do is valid (p. 211).
  • Butters inventiveness (Chapter 27):
    this is a very good example of doing what one can with limited strength / resources.
  • Chapter 41:
    Harry’s interaction with Hades is the highlight, for me, of this book. This is also one of those many instances where Mr Butcher’s superior knowledge of mythology has led me to do some research – and I will do more, one of these days, on the Greek Deities …
  • good example of working on an uncooperative (p. 362).
  • example of the unforeseen consequences of one’s actions (pp. 365 – 366):
    this is a little bit like invading another country …
  • true power comes from knowledge (p. 373):
    interesting – I’ll meditate further on this, but I’m inclined, at this stage, to agree.
  • redirection of a massive (physical magickal) attack:
    excellent use of vortices – and I have done this myself, in the this-verse,
  • love of magick rather than love of power (p. 387):
    Harry is commenting on his love of the philosophy of magick, as it is done in the Dresden-verse, rather than just wanting it as a tool to have and use power. In the context of the situation he is in at that time, this is reasonable, HOWEVER, I have to add that the topic should be thought of in light of Michael’s comments back in Chapter 20, and also, for me, the issue always is: what do you do with power – and there is no question that magick is an issue of having power, even if one does come to it out of the “right” motivations in your heart – to deny that is as irresponsible as seeking power for its own sake.
    I once asked someone who was what I describe as a “head Buddhist”, a stereotypical Westerner getting involved in Buddhism – and become aggressive about that – how he was better for being a Buddhist … and he couldn’t say!!! I’ve asked others how the world is a better place for their religious / spiritual philosophy, and often been disappointed. In my case, I am trying to make this world a better place – and I’m not interested in the ****wits who think that can only be pursued if one has been through great suffering or if one acknowledges self interest: such cretins are the sort of people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
    If you have power, you have a moral / ethical / spiritual DUTY to use it responsibly (which is something Harry has said elsewhere).
    The thing is, almost everyone has power – more than they realise …
  • size (p. 393):
    good realistic comments.
  • interesting twist about the character “Goodman Grey” (p. 439):
    I’d like to see where this goes in future, but it does raise the fact that we have the ability to choose what we do with what we have – including our environmental and, to some extent, genetic inheritances. As an example of the latter, I know women who undergone mastectomies to deal with the risk of breast cancer – another example might be caring about diet and exercise and health generally to deal with risks of heart attacks. As an example of the former, every survivor of child abuse I know who has had children has taken great care to make sure their children do not have the same experience.
Side Jobs 
(ROC, 2010, ISBN 978-0-451-46384-5)
Unfortunately, I don’t have access to all the short stories that have been written about the Dresden-verse. By the time I can spare the money for these, I hope the single collection will be available. Also, I haven’t bought the “graphic novels”: I might, one day, but … don’t hold your breath.
A Restoration of Faith
  • this has some good human elements and back story (when Harry met Murphy), and a bit of mythology based loosely around trolls – although I have never heard of trolls bursting apart into little trolls. Good lesson on emotions and magick for a child.
Vignette
  • shows Harry’s commitment to ethics.
Something Borrowed
  • Harry is very patronising of the werewolves – particularly so given that he was in that fight (p. 30).
  • good example of the social expectations and other rubbish that should be thrown out in regard to weddings (p. 32).
  • excellent comments that indulging in histrionics does not help (p. 37).
  • limitations and requirements (to work and make an effort) of magic are right (pp. 42 – 43).
  • Chicago sinking (p. 45 – and many other places in these stories):
    as a civil engineer, this interested me, and I am aware of some very interesting things such as jacking buildings up while people keep working in them, but have no confirmation of some of the other aspects of this. I know parts of the Manhattan Project were initially based in Chicago – and many other places as well.
  • "shelly cobs” (p. 48):
    nice bit of writing.
  • use of magick to – sort of – walk on water (p. 49):
    cute.
  • sleep spell to be broken by kiss of true love (pp. 51 – 52): pretty much required for the anthology this story was going into, but … ho-hum.
  • using fire sprinkler water to disperse magick (also in “Small Favor”; p. 54):
    I’ve commented on the mythology of running water being a magickal barrier before, but, in this instance, the distraction, if nothing else, would mean it could conceivably work.
It’s My Birthday, Too
I enjoyed this story.
  • ‘tis garlic flowers that repel vampires – I’ve been reading Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”, largely as a result of what is in these books.
  • the household cobbs (or cobbler elves) were a nice touch: I enjoyed them.
Heorot
This is probably my favourite story in this anthology – I enjoyed re-researching the myth (I had first done so a long time ago, when I first came across it … pre-Internet). Go, Valkyries!
  • endearing, sincere people driven by emotions can be wrong (p. 112):
    yup, absolutely.
  • Harry being kept in the dark is not just ironic, it also has a karmic element to it (pp. 125 – 126).
  • Gard makes a good comment about virgins always being in short supply. I’d also note the number of allegedly virgin pregnancies experienced by teenagers – and single women - in the Middle Ages (p. 118).
  • The comments about the Grendelkin’s need for mead are, I suspect, more Dresden-verse than this-verse … (p. 118).
  • I generally enjoy Gard’s use of runes – or, to be more accurate, what are probably bindrunes. Her Rune of Routine here is similar to what I have been working on for a couple of years with the help of my friend Tony, RMftB * - we’ve actually got it drawn, but I have to write it up – as an alternative to the Seal of Solomon for invisibility. The latter calls on a Deity to bloodily rip the eyes out of the person one doesn’t want to be seen by, whereas the bindrune design Tony and I have come up with just minimises our visibility.
    * Rune Master from the Bush
Day Off
This is introduced as a foray by Mr Butcher into comedy. Actually, there is good – intentional - humour all the way through the Dresden books, so I don’t actually consider this his first foray into that area at all.
  • (no magickal or other comments)
Back up
An intriguing insight into Harry’s brother, Thomas.
  • good comments about most people only needing the level of ability that matches what has to be done (p. 186).
  • the Dresden-verse has a few differences to the this-verse I live in, and one is the concept that Deities need attention from humans to be anchored into this world. I know others in the this-verse who share that view, and consider it complete bollocks – it is a sign of human arrogance and presumption, the sort of thinking that insisted the Earth could not possibly orbit round the Sun.
    Deities exist for their own purposes - I’ve speculated a few times that it is to bring something into manifestation, something which can then be used by humans, and thus reduces the need for active work, perhaps, on that matter, but that doesn’t change the fact of the Deities existence, nor the validity of their purpose. Humans may change and forget what has been brought into existence, in which case the mediumship of the Deity will be needed again.
  • (I also don’t buy into the Dresden-verse idea of diluting Deities by multiple rituals – that sort of thinking is also human-centric, limited, and contradicts some of the points made by, for instance, the character Uriel.)
The Warrior
The introductory comments by Jim Butcher are very thoughtful – and well worth reflecting on. I got a lot out of this story – far more than these brief comments would indicate. (I’m starting to run out of steam for this long review project, which comes in the middle of several other major life events.)
  • defensive amulet (p. 223):
    interesting … I wonder I would make something like that for the this-verse?
  • on p. 224:
     - the purifying nature of fire – potentially, fire can be purifying, yes;
     - the “like to like” connection with the fake sword – yes, and good thinking;
     - turkey snags – NO, NO, NO!!!
There is a lot more on ethics, the risks of losing balance when one has strong emotional triggers (on both sides), and what, effectively, random acts of kindness. One day when I am in a better place in terms of life generally (or at least not moving house), I might come back and try to write more about this story … but, knowing me, I probably won’t get around to it.
Last Call
I’m going to skip this one. It’s basically about Dionysian type events, and, as one of my ex-partners was (and probably still is) an alcoholic who put me through hell, I have no inclination to view any such things neutrally: I see them only through the prism of the past abuse I have endured.
Love Hurts
  • this is a good story about the need to be genuine;
  • good to see Harry pounding the (psychic) pavement as a PI (p. 310).
  • "junkies don’t need to be happy; they need to be free” (p. 332):
    too right.
Aftermath
It sounds corny, but I actually get quite a bit out of this because of the description of stereotypical male behaviour – something I’ve never really understood anyway.
  • good example of male body language and aggression (p. 350).
  • sensible comments about a threshold (p. 377).
  • interesting how Murphy works through her fear (p. 395).
Overall, I found this a very inspiring story.

Rightio then, that’s all done – now I’m going to go back and read ‘em all for pleasure! (Well, the ones that haven’t been packed for this blasted move, at any rate.)


Monday, 14 March 2016

Post No. 838 - Some minor, mostly magickally focused comments on “The Dresden Files” – Part Three (Books 9 – 12)

Other posts in this series:
More to be posted as I complete them.


Book No. 09 – White Night
(ROC, 2008, first pub. 2007, ISBN 978-0-451-46155-1)
  • magickal kit in a tackle box (p. 7):
    these days, I use a laptop case, but I stretch that to include cloth shopping bags if I need more kit :) . The tackle box is an interesting idea –I’ve use one of those for storing nails and screws and bolts in … maybe I should just bite the bullet and build what I need when we get settled in the new house …
  • copper filings spell (p. 8):
    cool.
  • introduction of examination of neochristian views on magic theme (pp. 6 – 7, 8 – 9, 10 – 13):
    I think one of the things that needs to be said about the hate preached against Wicca, magick, LGBT people, other religions, etc, is that it comes from
    neochristianity – NOT Christianity, which is about loving one’s neighbour as oneself (no, I’ve not become a Christian – I’m still quite happily Pagan).
    In these pages, a few viewpoints are discussed, but the character Murphy doesn’t at all make the point she claims to be promoting, which is an insight into her character flaws: could a flaw in her communication skills be part of what happens to her later, and part of what doesn’t happen between her and Harry?
  • psychism (pp. 27 – 34):
    good explanation of how it works, although in the context of a weird situation that I wouldn’t expect to happen in this-verse. The comment about taking longer to focus when one is learning are correct, although the times are perhaps not as long for the stuff I’ve done / experienced / witnessed in the real-verse.
  • grounding (p. 34):
    good comments.
  • teaching (p. 38):
    excellent comments – one needs to know the whys and why nots as much as the how to.
  • physically glowing (p. 39):
    I’d actually like to be able to physically glow … I’ve read of such happening in one of
    Lobsang  Rampa’s books (pp. 185 – 186 of “Feeding the Flame”): be cool to be able to do it :) This book has a few good moments of humour and understandable – for me – “bloke speak”.
  • wards (p. 55, 61):
    some excellent, very thoughtful comments that are well worth considering in this-verse.
  • prescience (pp. 56 – 58):
    I haven’t come across people like this, which means not much at all: they may exist.
  • giving one’s word (pp. 61 – 62):
    very good comments along the lines of what I have termed “
    mind your Mӕgan”.
  • bigots (p. 89):
    sadly, these are accurate comments.
  • era of magickal languages (p. 94):
    many practitioners choose to use some language other than their native language – well, certainly a significant number of the native English speaking practitioners I know. A thought that came to mind as I read this is: the language chosen may be one from an era where one has positive associations – perhaps especially with magick. Thus, for instance, those people who use Kemetic may have had good magickal associations with a past life in Ancient Egypt. Those who choose Latin may have had likewise, but in Ancient Rome. In my case, I had some good associations from the Middle Ages which make the very limited amount of Hebrew I know very powerful for me.
  • being boring rather than invisible (p. 101):
    yes! – I can totally relate to this: have done it. At times in my life I have focused on generating “undetectability”, which is the same sort of thing, and this crops up in later books.
  • using anti-fae illusion unguent for another purpose (p. 103):
    although the unguent would be less effective than for its intended purpose, this is good adaptability.
  • group effort to build wards (pp. 110 – 111):
    this is something I have been trying to set up through the
    Rangers of the Inner Plane, and the paired exercises when teaching people how to clear. I thoroughly approve of the concept – it is how a group can clear strong uncooperatives, for instance, as groups that I have been a lesser light in have done in years gone by.
  • shield “permeable to the living” (p. 122):
    that’s more like it! Be creative – use your intention flexibly :)
  • “little Chicago” (p. 133):
    what a great idea – and what a MASSIVE amount of work. For what I have to do (e.g., the Psychic Weather Reports), dowsing with a map will do …
  • learning / development / teaching (p. 137):
    really excellent comments – effectively, says one gets to a stage where one has to teach in order to be able to learn more. Very true.
  • temperature changes in response to magick (p. 138):
    in my case, in the real-verse, I often find my body temperature goes up in response to magickal energy, but the temperature of the environment stays the same (I’m not drawing the energy from the physical level, as Harry does – or seems to).I also find that having a lot of nonBPM energy / units near me, or in me / my aura, will make me feel cold - or colder.
  • awareness and thinking (p. 142):
    these are always good – important, even.
  • sensing intruders (p. 151):
    this is something I do occasionally – check for entities / units that shouldn’t be there. May find entities, but more often portals that have been opened and left opened.
  • telepathy (p. 177):
    about time we saw some of this!
  • Elaine’s comments about the White Council (pp. 182 – 183):
    are spot on – she is correct, in my opinion.
  • effect of mind control (p. 184):
    good list – well worth thinking about, and is very similar to lists of symptoms from psychic attack.
  • ghouls (p. 198):
    I looked this concept up after reading these books, and found – according to Wikipedia – that this is
    from Arab mythology.
  • uncertainty re where people fit on the “Jedi-Sith” scale (p. 199):
    great comment – especially the uncertainty. The real-verse is all just shades of grey …
  • conservation of energy (p. 207):
    this principle applies to energy to some extent, but it is difficult to access owing to fact that energy can be shifted between
    Levels of Reality, can be transformed, and can, in fact, be created (e.g., by visualisation – unless that is drawing energy from another Level of Reality). In the context of this series of books, however, it is consistent with the physics-based premise of the Dresden-verse.
  • genetic predisposition for magick (pp. 215 – 216):
    I find one’s spiritual history is more significant than anything in the physical – and if one does look at genetic causes, such influences are spread pretty thin very quickly, unless one breeds specifically for a particular characteristic – which risk inbreeding.
  • admission of someone being faster and better (p. 217):
    nice to see that admission – that is what more is needed of in the real-verse, rather than trying to claim that everyone has equal abilities, let alone conflating ability and worth. I can’t run quickly – athletes are and always will be better at running than me: that doesn’t make them of greater intrinsic worth than  me, nor are the people who have greater intelligence or greater emotional depth or better spiritual development than I inherently better than me in terms of worth / potential. I may, however, have to work long and hard to manifest / develop the same level of ability (and that may be in another life), but that will mean I have realised more of my potential, which is good and admirable, not that I have become an inherently more worth y being – although I may be more useful, in many ways, which is a different matter.
  • rage (pp. 231 – 236):
    Harry’s response is linked to his attitudes towards kids (i.e., that they need to be protected), but there is also a need to consider
    : Do you fight to change things, or to punish? (see here). There are other aspects to this which will also come out later in this book.
  • healing (p. 240):
    YES! This is something else that it is nice to see finally turning up.
  • heightened awareness as a defence (p. 258):
    YES!
  • the dead and pain (p. 308):
    the dead can actually feel pain – for instance, grief and remorse at wrongdoing, and, if they are earthbound, they can feel an extraordinary amount of pain of all types.
  • the potential for change, knowing oneself, and that we are what we do (pp. 332 – 337):
    are well illustrated in the discussion on these pages.
    I also had a thought to explore the concept of equal and opposite reactions from a psychological perspective – which is all but stated in the book. Thus, for instance, if someone is being evil – pushing it out of their mind into manifestation, in a sense, that evil is exerting a bit of pressure back onto that mind. Conversely, if one is trying to be good, the good will exert a beneficial effect back onto the originating mind.
  • don’t write others off as monsters (p. 339):
    EXCELLENT comments – from a pragmatic point of view, even the most evil of people, people like Hitler, don’t stop existing when they die: their Soul / astral / spirit / term of your preference continues to exist, and will come back into incarnation with the same attributes /characteristics / hatreds / insecurities / flaws/ etc – unless someone or some set of circumstances can change them. And hence my
    changing the personality of oppressors post –and, if we are aiming, as a society / species, to deal with these issues constructively and early, then perhaps we will have fewer people like Hitler.
  • the importance of proper motivation when working with power (pp. 350 – 352):
    very good illustration of this.
  • there is always a risk to taking action (p. 353):
    but, as President John F. Kennedy said:
    There are risks and costs to a program of action. But they are far less than the long-range risks and costs of comfortable inaction.
  • no shortage of people who want to kneel to another (p. 370):
    sadly, this is too true.
  • thought is faster than the physical (p. 393):
    yes, this is potentially so – unless one is tired, distracted, etc.
  • use of chaos magick / entropy in a shield (p. 394):
    interesting idea. Not sure I’d want to do it with nonphysical nonBPM energies, but I could well get something useful in the real-verse by thinking about this concept.
  • mistake of two-dimensional thinking (p. 398):
    this is quite true. Furthermore, my training, back in the 1980s, included using dimensional shifts to get behind defences, and countering same when on the defensive.
  • Earth magick spells (p. 428, 431):
    interesting applications. These are something else I will think about at some time to see what I can get out of them.
  • mental psychic attack (pp. 438 – 447):
    good example of what an extreme version of this could possibly look like. In the real-verse, connection to one’s Higher Self would be needed to fight this off.
  • we use 10% of our brain (p. 441):
    this is actually an urban myth. All of our physical brain has a purpose, but we may not realise all that we are capable of mentally – which is where the myth started (as a misinterpretation).
  • holding to one’s word (pp. 458 – 459):
    interesting example.
  • the Paranet (p. 473):
    great idea. I - and many others, no doubt – once hoped that the internet would enable something like this, but I’m finding there is too much rubbish on it now (particularly from role playing games), so an thinking such may need to take a step back, and be built up via personal contacts.
  • always read a Contract (p. 479):
    YES.

Book No. 10 – Small Favor [sic]
(ROC, 2009, first pub. 2008, ISBN 978-0-451-46200-8)
  • Magickally induced fire behaves as physically lit fire does (p. 31):
    what about
    Spontaneous Human Combustion? Also, probably depends how much effort put into controlling the fire – which also applies to other psychically created energies: how much effort is put into managing the effects? As is discussed on p. 32 … :)
  • Pentacle (p. 34):
    good comments re pentacle.
  • Residual magic (pp. 38 – 39):
    yes, and hence psychometry.
  • Balance between using physical devices and visualisation (p. 41):
    good comments.
  • fight or flight response (p. 57):
    this was distorted by the use of male lab rats: there is also a
    network and nurture response.
  • Focus of spell on just hinge (p. 75):
    good!
  • The way Harry climbs down the “chimney” (p. 77):
    I actually think there are better mountain climbing techniques – for instance, the one where you put your back against one side, and use your feet against the other. Would think that gave more and better controlled pressure – but maybe Harry was worried about what the chill of the ice against his back would do. Back to magick.
  • Well, maybe not just yet. Why would someone go somewhere that would put children at risk – particularly when they have a bias towards keeping them safe? Is this Mab’s influence? (p. 142)
  • Try to help first rather than try to smite first (pp. 154 – 156):
    This is admirable, and is much needed when trying to rescue uncooperatives. At least here in the real-verse, rescue involves sending an uncooperative to some place better (or attempting to do so), whereas the situation in the Dresden-verse has been written to include killing as a possible outcome – I’m already dealing with someone who is dead, so I don’t have to face that sort of choice (phew!). The comments about sophistry are particularly good.
  • friendship (p. 162):
    very good comments.
  • bloodlines (p. 167):
    any genetic influence tends to be well diluted after a few generations. Thus, Sanya saying he can trace his physical ancestry back to Salahuddin is actually fairly meaningless.
    Personally, I have found people’s personal spiritual heritage to be far more significant.
    (The way one would maintain and concentrate a physical bloodline is by deliberately breeding for it – which, in terms of psychic abilities, has been well explored in the
    Darkover series by the now  very  discredited  Marion Zimmer Bradley.)
    The comments about “the King and the Land are one” are very Pagan – which reflects the development of agriculture, and the concept of sacrifice, and I think we have evolved past the desperate lack of understanding that connected sacrifice to taking a physical life. (Prior to agriculture, gather-hunter societies were more shamanistic.)
  • shortcomings and imperfections of the law (p. 212):
    these comments are partly contextual to what is happening in the story line, but physical things often are imperfect. As is written in another Dresden book (although not in exactly these words): there is the world that should be, and the world that is; we live in one, and must make the other happen.
  • use of chaos for nonBPM outcomes (p. 217 and elsewhere):
    good discussion on this, and motivations people may have. HOWEVER, chaos can also be used for BPM outcomes – e.g., to break down rigid structures.
  • giving one’s word (p. 230):
    crops up again – is important, kiddies :)
  • hobs and myrk (Ch. 23):
    another instance where I’ve learned some mythology from these books – looked it up on the Internet -
    here , which is a little different from how the term has been used in these books. Didn’t have any luck with “myrk”, but the usage feels right …
  • size of circle (p. 250):
    although it is not standard, I don’t always physically walk to outside of a circle that I am creating: I sometimes just “push” it out to where I want it (within reason – usually this means I cast the circle at the energetic centre of the house, and then push it out to the property boundary).
  • limitations of witnesses (pp. 297 – 30):
    very true comments about some of the rubbish that alleged witnesses to events such as car accidents can come out with.
  • drawing energy in does NOT create a “hole” (p. 322):
    true – agreed.
  • no access to more energy inside a circle (p. 322):
    not in the real-verse.
  • ways of defending against psychic (magickal) attack (pp. 352 – 354):
    interesting ideas.
  • faith healing /banishing (pp. 401 – 402):
    this is a very neochristian way to do this: there are others, EQUALLY as valid and effective, and they are just as “pure”.
  • good comments on friends and trauma (p. 410)
  • pain (p. 441):
    generally has a purpose – I share Harry’s reluctance to shut it out /down.
  • Namsiel’s attack on Harry (p. 460):
    this is a very good example of a multidimensional attack.
  • Marcone (p. 462):
    although Dresden describes John Marcone as “criminal scum”, most of what we see in the early books in the series is reasonable. Later books start to show some of the nastier things Marcone is responsible for.
  • people collaborating with the Denarians “thought they were doing the right thing” (p. 497):
    so did the Nazis at the concentration and death camps. This is rubbish – all people have a conscience: to ignore it, or wilfully allow it to atrophy, is a deliberate act of evil.
  • Deities don’t see things as we do, from one place at one time (p. 514):
    true – good comment. Of course, if we evolve spiritually enough, we can approach this level of awareness also.
  • concept of past, mythic soothsayers as having been earlier incarnations of “the Archive”, driven insane by the burden of their knowledge (p. 524):
    this fits the Dresden-verse well, but also raises the issue of the mental and psychic strain that can go with enhanced awareness and knowledge – which is why it is important to “make haste slowly” …
    This was also mentioned in
    Lobsang  Rampa’s “The Cave of the Ancients”.
  • Soul Fire (p. 537):
    interesting idea, although neochristian. Raises the issue of combining energies / sources of energy for a holistic result …
  • the coming in of the Sight (p. 539):
    excellent comment about how people can be pains when they think their psychism is developing. Have been a few I’ve stopped working with because of that.

Book No. 11 – Turn Coat
(ROC, 2010, first pub. 2009, ISBN 978-0-451-46281-7)
This is probably my favourite book in the series – thus far.
  • Butters’ dubiousness about Harry’s forgiveness of Morgan’s past abuses of Harry (pp. 4 - 5):
    Butters is exactly right. What Harry has forgotten is that we train others how to treat us.
  • seeing clouds of energy and sparks of ideas when using clairvoyance (p. 26):
    yes.
  • clairvoyant perception of the skinwalker (p. 27):
    psychic sensing can and does show the essence of people (unless being blocked or warped by shielding etc). The description of the creature by the protagonist, Harry, is worse than I’ve come across (which may be artistic licence, to some extent, but is also consistent with the notion of wizards as exceptionally superior to us limited hacks), but some of the uncooperatives have actually been fairly bad.
  • Billy and Georgia’s non-reaction to Harry’s distressed appearance on their doorstep (p. 30):
    … really shows a certain disconcerting amount of cluelessness. If a friend shows up and clearly isn’t well, you just help them.
  • the adaptability of humans (pp. 32 – 33):
    true enough, at least for many of us, if not most.
  • the nastier nature of pre-Disney folklore (e.g., the original Brothers Grimm – and before them) and the issue of “psychic weight”:
    both issues are quite true.
    I’ve added the original Brothers Grimm works (which I’ve accessed via the good old Project Gutenberg) to my reading list. It is interesting to read folklore, but I’m always a little wary of giving it too much credence – it risks being a bit like talking to a crowd of witnesses at a car accident: people can be wrong, but think they’re right or should be right, or are just out for attention, etc. So … I take such stories with the folkloric grain of salt …
    On the matter of “psychic weight”, that works both ways: it can be a good weight, just as much as a bad. In fact, when I was at Uni, sharing a flat, my flatmate, clueless psychically and in other ways, came back from somewhere when I was doing my alternate nostril breathing exercises, and even he commented on the almost physical feeling of peace when he walked in.
  • eating magic (p. 53):
    here that idea is again. Seems cannibalistic, which is probably why I have so many problems with it.
  • resistance to subtle but strong mental psychic attack (p. 75):
    good example.
  • Thomas’ struggle against his vampire nature (p. 83):
    this struggle, covered in quite a few places in quite a few books, is very well done – even better than in
    Buffy.
  • people jumping to conclusions about Morgan (p. 89):
    this is a good example of fear clouding people’s judgement.
  • attitude and behaviour of Harry and Morgan towards Molly re emotions (pp. 95 – 100):
    are completely and utterly unacceptable. This rank stupidity on these characters parts, until Harry finally gets his act together later in the book, is extremely annoying … and that’s another example of why Mr Butcher is the successful write, and I’ve got a crushing day job … * SIGH *
  • who Molly is “really” angry with (p. 105):
    this is also just utterly, absolutely and completely wrong. In the real-verse, I know many people who think this way, and that is why the world is so ****ed up. We need more activists – people who are prepared to say “no”, that behaviour is wrong. People like feminists – who are people who care about other human beings, and want everyone to achieve their full potential. Any cretin who considers a feminist is a boot and overalls wearing man-hater is a moron. I mean, after all, I don’t wear overalls, and I’m pretty much prepared to hate people of any gender :)
  • Faraday cage would ground out psychic energies “once” (p. 108):
    not in the real-verse usage of these (e.g.,
    "Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth" by Stuart Holroyd), so why? Because get overloaded and burned out?
  • “time immemorial” (p. 122):
    my take on this phrase is that it generally means “before the time of anyone I know personally”.
  • in the Dresden-verse, Harry finds ley lines jarring (p. 13):
    in this-verse, I find them lovely, mostly soothing, and very, very subtle.
  • Ebenezer’s dress sense (p. 127):
    I like this. I detest pretentious, fancy clothes – and hate dress ups with a passion. I’d rather be comfortable.
  • forensic psychic investigation (p. 138):
    what a great idea. I’ll never try to do that – far too complex, but maybe someone else will – or has already.
  • how does one do the “right thing” if there isn’t a “right thing”? (p. 141):
    very true, and well worth anyone interested in
    Balanced Positivity having a think about.
  • Murphy’s question (p. 155):
    is actually quite significant. No spoilers.
  • Binder’s “goons” from the nonphysical (pp. 160 – 161, 167-168):
    I haven’t come across anything like this in the this-verse, but it is a plausible concept.
  • logical and correct use of circles (pp. 166 – 168, 174 – 175):
    (Incidentally, in the this-verse, when I am
    rescuing  uncooperatives, I get my BPM  Guides to bring the entity into a pre-prepared circle.)
  • Morgan’s award from the Summer Queen (pp. 183 – 18):
    this shows the potential problems of gifts, which I’ve
    posted about previously.
  • example of nonBPM mind control / psychic attack (p. 206):
    this is an extreme, fictionalised example of what can happen … except I’m not so sure it doesn’t happen in the this-verse.
  • using sleep spell as response to damage caused by mind control (pp. 209 – 210):
    this is a very good response in the Dresden-verse. In the this-verse, such matters are more complicated / delicate, as is most healing from major trauma – although going to the astral world is potentially a good reset of some things.
  • Harry FINALLY stands up to Morgan’s provocations and points out some home truths (p. 213).
  • not having relationships so one cannot be threatened / blackmailed through them (p. 217):
    in the this-verse, this is actually a very real issue for people such as members of special forces, and is one of the reasons (there are others) that serving special forces members are not – or should not be – identified by the media. Another example of this sort of potential problem. is the hostages in Iraq who put on shows of tears etc because co-hostages, friends or colleagues, were being threatened off camera. More broadly, it is an extreme example of issues such as
    indirect psychic attack and lifestyle vulnerabilities – and a very extreme response to that risk. In most situations, such extreme measures are not even remotely justifiable: in most cases, it is simply one’s Duty to protect these people, just as one should be caring about and trying to protect people one is not connected to as well.
  • Anastacia’s focused magick – without use of foci / tools (p. 234):
    YES!
  • being choked hurts (p. 239):
    yes, it does – from personal experience. It’s also terrifying – which made the critical response of some people to someone who lashed physically when she was being choked utterly unconscionable and unforgiveable.
  • the “surcease” from pain offered to Harry as an example of control (p. 252):
    actually, this struck me as a retreat to childhood, and thus was repellent to me,
  • longevity, family and perspective (pp. 262 – 269):
    this was quite an interesting conversation (how would one conduct oneself if one knew one was going to outlive one’s family members, as the wizards in the Dresden-verse do?), but:
          (a) the comments about atrocities in Europe not being known, or being unclear are something I dispute, and
          (b) the USA is NOT “the best we’ve had so far” – nowhere near it. I actually consider the USA to be extremely backward in many aspects.
  • discussion on gender, predominantly in context oif an immortal creature (pp. 272 – 273):
    this is actually rubbish, in both the Dresden-verse and the this-verse. Neither protagonist Harry nor talking head Bob are anything but clueless on the topic – as Harry often mentions.
  • fundamental soundness of oral transmission in pre-literate (i.e., no writing systems) societies (p. 274):
    yes – correct, or reasonably so, in the context of important things. In both -verses.
  • Werewolf Will standing up to Harry (pp. 282 – 284):
    good on him! This is great character development for Will (formerly referred to as Billy), and continues a theme (interestingly,
    Mr Butcher has commented that he doesn’t write themes in his books – which parallels remarks by Richard Bach that books tend to smash through walls and say they will not rest until he sets them down in writing- so no planning of themes either … which also is my [limited! – and non-commercial] experience) of Harry learning to give people the knowledge they need in order to be able to make informed decisions.
  • nothing on Binder, so he “has” to be released (p. 288, p. 307):
    rubbish! He assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest!
  • tracking spells (p. 289):
    reasonable explanation.
  • subtle versions of mind control (pp. 328 – 329):
    good comments.
  • the ethics and consequences of actions and tests to detect when these are being bent (pp. 330 – 332):
    well said, Harry.
  • Sanctum ritual (pp. 347 – 359):
    this is an interesting concept –and, I suspect, Mr Butcher’s research has probably given him a better comprehension of what is involved for such shamanic rituals than myself. Personally, I just tend to seek to befriend the spirits of places – e.g., offerings, politeness and niceness when moving to a new patch of dirt, asking permission to enter forests, etc, always making sure one GIVES (e.g., feeding the land spirits) before one even thinks of TAKING (i.e., asking for help). Harry’s approach strikes me as being very macho – and thus wouldn’t have a chance of working with any spirits that are more of the nature of what is generally described as stereotypically female. Of course, in this instance, Harry was dealing with an aggressive spirit, and had a pressing need for the sanctum ritual (getting events away from innocent bystanders).
  • Intellectus (p. 360:
    as described, this is very like true intuition – which is NOT vain imaginings or vague in nature.
  • an example of good ethical choice (p. 364):
    they are far too often scary, even if most don’t involve literal risks to one’s physical survival, as is the case on the referenced page of the book.
  • nightfall (p. 391 – 392):
    there is a great quote on the referenced pages about nightfall, but, more generally, this view contrasts with the elemental approach to arts of the day in
    Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry series, let alone the active power used by sorcerers in Carlos Castaneda’s books.
  • variety of magickal styles (pp, 420 – 421):
    although this is limited to combat situations, the variety of ways that magick can be used is worth thinking about.
  • Binder’s responsibility for a death (p. 438):
    being responsible for someone’s death is ALWAYS a personal matter. There is a lot of rubbish that some people spout that, because they felt no malice in it, it “wasn’t personal”. You cretins, you have TAKEN EVERYTHING from another human being – there little is more personal! (I also see the same sort of crap from bigots who then spout hateful or inaccurate rubbish that is likely to drive people to commit suicide – which has been in the news of late here because of the so-called “debate” over equal marriage.) Going back to the book, Binder is directly and personally responsible for bringing through to the physical and giving orders to the creatures that murdered the warden. This all strikes me as a little too close to the
    Nuremberg  “defence” of “I was only following orders”.
  • examples of positive (constructive) use of emotions in magick (p. 449, p. 451 – 454).
  • the use of magickal foci (p. 450):
    for someone who is so eloquent on the need for and use of magickal foci, Harry sure gets caught without them a lot of times …
  • fight against malevolent entity by Harry, Toot Toot and Listens to Wind (pp. 452 – 467):
    I sometimes use this passage as inspiration if I know I have heavy clearing session ahead of me.
  • example of the difference between justice and retribution (aka, revenge) (p. 474).
  • careful use of words and labels (p. 477):
    this is in relation to the “naagloshii”, also called “skin walkers”, which Listens to Wind tells Harry he should not name to avoid building its reputation of fear.
    On that, I am unmoved by most psychic horror stories: the one that always gets to me is the
    Navajo stories of skin-walkers –I’m fine with the description of these in “Turn Coat”, but when I read anything directly connected to the Navajo or their land, I get chills. I suspect that comes from a past life I had there (I also love jingle dresses / dances, but would be far too embarrassed to have a go in this life). The other North American Indian life I had was in the Akwesasne, which is the life where I was responsible for the death of my brother in that life (I didn’t kill him directly, but had an indirect responsibility), who is now one of my BPM Guides.
    In the course of researching this, I came across some interesting links:   the
    Wikipedia article on skin-walkers;   this article;   the Navaho creation myth;   the Wikipedia article on the Blessing Way, and here, for part of the text of that ritual, the novel “The Blessing Way” by Tony Hillerman (which I have added to my book purchasing wish list, out of curiosity), X-Files season 3 1st episode “The Blessing Way”, and a bunch of videos on YouTube and elsewhere here, here, here, here, and here;   Wikipedia’s list of cryptids and article on the Chupacabra;   the Wikipedia article on the Enemy Way;   the Wikipedia article on Ghost Sickness (also see the film “The Missing”).
    Now, go back and re-consider the topic of fear and phobophages from “Proven Guilty”, and then reconsider Listen to Winds’ advice … ;
  • “good fights”, and the limits of same (p. 478).
  • the possible implications of accepting one’s duty (p. 480):
    good example, although as shown more likely in the Dresden-verse than the this-verse. Here in the this-verse, things like being destroyed by fulfilling one’s duty / obligations towards one’s dependents is far more likely.
  • dealing with rage about injustice (pp. 481 – 482):
    is discussed. I’ve been thinking about this, as I think about my general idea to write more about how one heals the damage of control and similar events, and am thinking of coming up with a flow chart …
  • telepathy (pp. 507 – 508):
    another good example.
  • the possibility that tampering with someone’s mind can lead to happiness (p. 523):
    this is an interesting discussion, and, having thought about it, I can see it happening – including in my life, and the lives of some people I have known.

Book No. 12 – Changes
(ROC, 2011, first pub. 2010, ISBN 978-0-451-46347-0)
This is probably my 2nd favourite book in the series – although it is quite violent: if the violence was less, it would be my favourite.
  • magic and emotion are inextricably connected” (p. 5):
    to the extent that emotions rule people, and thus their Will, yes. It is possible to start to develop one’s ability to think, and thus use one’s Will, and thus rise above some of the motions that one should – e.g., petty jealousy, back stabbing, etc, whilst using the emotions that are good – e.g., love. It is important to do so in a way that doesn’t forget that emotions can be useful indicators – e.g., of situations being inherently wrong, which is a mistake that protagonist Harry and his mentor, Ebenezer, tend to make.
  • decision by Susan to remove her and Harry from their daughter’s life, for the sake of their daughter’s safety (pp. 13 – 14):
    in the Dresden-verse, where Susan and Harry are fighting vampires and other creatures that regularly put their lives physically at risk, Susan’s decision was the only one that could be made. However, this is a personal trigger point of Harry’s (something most of us have), and he reacts true to form.
  • Martin’s comments about events happening outside the USA to Harry (p. 21):
    are very, VERY good. The character Harry is like stereotypical US citizens (the ones we come across in the media – and as often as not made fun of by US citizens, showing an encouraging level of awareness and self-critique-ing :) ), with a strong focus on events in the USA, to the extent that they forget that there is a world elsewhere. I have to say that most Americans I’ve met are not like that, and the fact that Mr Butcher is writing about this shows he isn’t either :) However, such people are present everywhere, in every nation, and suffer from problems such as immaturity, or not being very far along their growth orientation path, or nonBPM influence from parents /peers / etc, and so on. Of course, those people suffering those flaws are not in what is possibly one of the most influential / powerful nations on this planet, at this time …
  • Harry’s quick reactions to his instincts about danger, rather than fluffing about (p. 24):
    GOOD!
  • killing people is ALWAYS personal (p. 41):
    as I’ve explained above. This applies even if it is “click-boom”, as Harry puts it.
  • Harry’s regrets for allowing his emotions to dictate how he uses magick, and to what depth he invests himself (p. 45):
    although this is about personal consequences, this is continuing an exploration of this connection which is building up to something, and is always worth thinking about. As I say in my quotations page:
          Like fire to the physical, emotions to the soul make a good servant, and a bad master.
  • giving people knowledge so that they can make an informed decision (p. 4):
    Harry is finally learning to do this, which is good.
  • discussion about warlocks (p. 65):
    these considerations also apply to
    rescue of uncooperatives.
  • except for the threat to Molly, I am more with the Merlin than Harry on this one: there are times when numbers do matter – which is the sort of decision military commanders have to make, as well as those who do not have enough resources to help everyone (p. 73).
  • “the ways” (p. 75):
    these sound a lot like
    wormholes.
  • Harry’s elaborately manufactured physical circle (p. 83):
    this sounds cool. If I was rich, I might have something like that made, too.
  • the importance of ethical considerations around working with magick (p. 97):
    are well illustrated in this passage, where Harry is hiding things he has that are illegal. Compliance with the law is, in my view, an ethical matter. If you consider a law wrong, work to change it (and, having done that, I do know how much work that entails, and the many, MANY options open to people doing that sort of work), rather than just ignore it. We’re part of this world for a reason.
    In terms of magick, one of the things Harry is slowly learning – and I, also – is that magickal tools are not always essential: when one is advanced enough, they become optional, albeit possibly at the expense of more effort.
  • Martin’s explanation of what Susan has gone through (pp. 149 – 150):
    this is a very good illustration of the saying “walk a mile in another’s shoes before you judge them”.
  • Harry’s acknowledgement that he should have given Susan more information in the events covered in Grave Peril (p. 175):
    this is good, and continues the them I mentioned earlier. (Incidentally, one of the MANY reasons Jim Butcher is a MUCH better writer than me is that he can invest in making a character believable as being at the stage of development they are at, whereas I tend to want to skip the intermediary stuff and get to the final, fully developed version that I can see.)
  • speaking stones (p. 177):
    this is an interesting idea. Along this sort of line, I gave my (adoptive) mother a set of crystals that I kept a matched pair of, so I could better send her healing when she was ill.
    Also, there is a concept of proxy rocks, where members of a circle have two matched items (when I first came across it, I think in  
    "Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth" by Stuart Holroyd, the concept was for rocks, but it could be crystals or some other small item), one on them, to be kept “up to date” with that person’s “vibe”, the other being kept at the circle. If the person is unable to physically attend, their “proxy rock” is set up in their place – which helps them be a part of what is going on (more so if they are doing the same sort of work at the same time, despite not being physically present). Once a month or so, the rocks are swapped over, to refresh the connection.
  • acknowledgement of the inherent selfishness of being focused on blood connections (p. 215):
    this is quite true, but basically just shows that the person concerned has NOT travelled very far along the
    growth orientation path known as Bhakti Yoga.
  • the risks that go with having (or seeking) power (p. 217);
  • the joke from the previous day that Harry just gets (p. 223):
    I don’t get –and none of the online discussion on this that I’ve seen helps. SIGH
  • faith (pp. 252 – 252):
    excellent comments.
  • using mind, rather than props, for magick (p. 280):
    yes – well done, Harry, well done.
  • calling three times to summon (p. 286):
    somewhere else in these books is an explanation that this is more a trigger of an irresistible curiosity for the entities summoned, rather than an overwhelming compulsion to obey an order – which I consider to be quite appropriate. Triplets work well for a lot of people – although the modern generation is more accustomed to working with longer numbers, so that may change. The key here is repetition to strengthen.
  • the things that people will do for love, including self-destruction (p. 293):
    this is quite true – at least when looked at in the context of immediate events. People may change their minds about what they’ve done or committed themselves to later on.
  • Harry’s honesty about what he is doing, and why (p. 298):
    this is good, and offsets – to some extent, at any rate – the selfishness shown on pp. 294 – 295, where he was prepared to kill thousands for the sake of one girl – his child.
  • the mantle is starting to influence Harry in terms of how he is reacting to Molly (p. 316).
  • domovoi vs. polevoi (p. 326):
    Mr Butcher’s superior knowledge of
    mythology on the referenced page led to some very interesting research for me.
  • great joke by Sanya about Harry and the little folk (p. 328).
  • Sanya’s pragmatic acceptance of “bad things” (p. 330):
    I share this to quite an extent – and consider such pragmatism part of
    Balanced Positivity.
  • it’s actually a Pentacle, not a pentagram (p. 429).
  • blood sacrifice (p. 456):
    the concept of taking life as a blood sacrifice is chilling to modern sensibilities, and is – and has always been – spiritually unacceptable. I include the taking of animal life in that – animal rights are just as universal as human rights (which is something I meant to post about years ago after reading
    this, but never got around to it), although I acknowledge that there is a pragmatic element to that (for instance, I know a vegan who had to start eating meat because of iron loss problems caused by heavy periods).
    On the other hand, there can be a place for the use of blood. As an example, I have sometimes used a drop of my blood to help charge and consecrate rune cards that I may have made, I have used things like this to help strengthen the connection to totem poles I have for my use, and I have added a drop of my blood to some spells - e.g., protection of Significant Others or children. Such things should, however, always be used with caution – for instance, the Significant Others may not always be Significant Others …
    In the context of history, people have generally done this, I suspect, because they honestly thought it was necessary (which does NOT make it right – ignorance of the [spiritual] Law is no excuse – people have always had a conscience, and have always – sadly – had the capability to let fear drown it out, but the voice of the conscience [our
    Higher Self and BPM  Guides] is ALWAYS there), which is a point explored in that part of Katharine Kerr’s magnificent Deverry  series where Aderyn’s younger life is being written about – including the fact that the sacrifice was useless.
  • the strength and help of other people (p. 500):
    great example.
  • example of the use of telepathy (p. 514).
  • an incredibly difficult choice (pp. 522 – 523):
    reading this is where I am glad that I am living in the this-verse, not the Dresden-verse, and thus don’t get faced with such choices. Of course it does occur in the this-verse as well, and I am thinking of some of the vicious situations people were pushed into in
    World War Part Two, as examples.
  • the consequences of taking major action (pp. 524 – 525):
    this is a bit like the consequences of taking over another nation – I mean, “causing regime change”.
    There have been some concerning fall outs from such events – for instance, I understand Japanese soldiers were used as police to maintain order in parts of South East Asia after the end of
    World War Part Two, which did cause resentment and social problems, whereas in Iraq the Iraqi army was disbanded rather than being subjected to de-Ba’athification – which would have been required to avoid the problems caused in South East Asia.
    The pages are worth reading and considering – and the fallout gets discussed more in subsequent books.
  • comments about choice, and that others cannot take away your Will (pp. 530 – 531):
    these are actually a bit naïve – things like torture for long periods can break people, and that is when you do lose your Will.

Keywords:
abuse of power, anger, animals, artificer, attitudes, authentic presence, awareness, balance, Balanced Positive, Bhakti, blackmail, blood, challenge, change, chaos, children, circle, clairvoyance, concentration, consequences, control, death, Deities, dimensions, discrimination, divination, dowsing, Earth (element), earthbound entities, elements, emotions, energy work, equal and opposite reaction, ethics, evil, faery, faith, family, fear, fight or flight or network and nurture, Fire (element), focus, folk lore, forgiveness, friends, genes / genetics, gifts / giving, grounding, growth orientation, guilt, healing, history, honour, ignorance, informed decisions, insularity, invisibility, invocation, isolation, judging others, justice, knowledge, language, levels, limitations, love, Mӕgan, magic, magickal language, magickal techniques and styles, magickal tools, manifestation, metaphysical mass, metaphysics, moral courage, motivation, mythology, myths, names, neochristianity, nightfall, Paganism, pain, Pentacle, pentagram, personal responsibility, perspective, phenomena, power, prejudice, preparation, prophecy, protection, psychic attack, psychic development, psychism, psychology, racism, reincarnation, rescue, residue, responsibility, revenge, risks, rituals, sacrifice, scepticism, Seelie, self knowledge, sexism, shielding, (the) Sight, society, spells, Spiritual Maturity, spirituality, subconscious, submissiveness, sunrise, survival after death, teaching, telepathy, temperature, tests, thaumaturgy, the Greater Good, train others how to treat us, uncooperative, understanding, undetectability, Unseelie, ward, werewolf, yoga,