For the most part, as towards the end of the interview the guest started to drift in to toxic forgiveness.
I have written about my concerns around that previously (see the link in the preceding paragraph), but there is another aspect of this that I consider worth emphasising, which is what I consider the abdication of responsibility for - or even acknowledging notion of - sharing the job of making this world a better place (which includes politics) that the attitudes around toxic forgiveness can allow to remain unchallenged - which is a form of spiritual bypassing, in a sense, but based on the world we live in (particularly the spiritual ecosystem, perhaps), rather than the individual.
I can understand that those who are focused on (toxic) forgiveness (note that some forgiveness is NOT toxic) and “ascension” may fear being overwhelmed by the task of trying to change this world (there are a lot of other people here, and it is a big task), but I cannot countenance the lack of empathy from people claiming to be more spiritual - that is just more of the “hard “love”” rubbish.
I have also realised that many of those seeking to ascend, including forgiving so that they personally can ascend, do not understand that:
firstly, the creation and maintenance of this level of reality is a joint project - it is not only a top down order from a single being/“god”, it is an active project of the Higher Selves of all sentient life here;
second, the reason the higher frequency worlds are so attractive is because everyone works together to make it so. If you do ascend to those worlds and fail to understand that, you risk being unable to meet many of the basic expectations of residents of those worlds;
thirdly, we CAN edge our world towards a better state of existence - partly individually, but mostly by working together, as has been shown by millennia of human rights advocacy and political progressivism ... but that requires a humble (stop thinking you can only be worthwhile by making the world perfect - or substantially better [which is quite a challenge for some of us], or making enough of a change to be seen as outstanding or reward-worthy) collaboration with others, which only works if all hold respect for each other - you for others, AND others for you.
So, in a nutshell, we have to overcome our erroneous thinking and attitudes, but a key part of doing so is acknowledging that we are also an inherent and interactive part of the fabric (or weave, if you prefer) of Life.
Trying to get out of here without trying to make here better is to a large part contrary to the reason this level of existence came into being, and is, in a sense, contrary to Life.
PS - I may rework this post at some stage in the future
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram.
Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.
Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative
Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
.jpg)
