Now, there are two aspects of this I wish to cover:
- a direct rebuttal of the nonsense; and
- a comment about the misplaced nature of the fear.
We pray that all people of all nations of this world come to peace within themselves and come to recognise whence they came.Does that sound like a group that is trying to harm humanity?
We pray that all civilisations of the Universe that are engaged in the balancing of the Universe be given peace and strength within to carry on the work to which they are committed.
We pray that the physical beings of the planet Earth come into a state of awareness and understanding in order for their souls to evolve to raise the spiritual level of the planet Earth and to cleanse the realms around the planet Earth for the betterment of all.
We pray that those beings and civilisations that are opposing what we do come to the Light of understanding so that they also come into perfect balance.
We pray that the day may soon come when all in the Universe have the knowledge and understanding that will make them whole.
We pray for understanding amongst ourselves, and for the strength that is needed so each of us can guide the others to become perfect beings.
We pray for the souls of all people of all nations of this world to be brought out of spiritual ignorance and into spiritual enlightenment.
The fear is, in my opinion - and this is where I get to the second point, really about lack of control over one's life.
As a first point, let me reject the nonsense that if one is in control of one's emotional reactions, one is control of one's life: if one is control of one's emotional reactions, one is in control of the effect that events in one's life are having, which is NOT control over the actual events bin one's life, which is what most people mean by "control" (and I've come across only a very few advocates for the control-of-emotional-reactions-is-control-of-ones-life theory who had enough common sense and knowledge of people to argue for their PERSPECTIVE up front, which is the only time and place that such advocates can, with any credibility, argue for a change of perspective). Now, in my opinion - and my experience, it is possible to have an actual, literal influence over the events in one's life, but that is subject to the constraints of:
(a) karma; andThe latter, in particular, can be a real pain, as they are about long term learning.
(b) the decisions made by one's Higher Self.
Now, as I written elsewhere, one of the very few areas where conspiracy nuts are onto something, is picking up the influence of earthbound entities who are using - or attempting to use - negative psychic control. In most cases, such attempts are not about trying to change or control the planet, they're about simple, personal, revenge - the person trying to exert the control is trying to "get even" with the person who either wronged them, or is thought by the earthbound entity to have wronged them. This may have continued for centuries - certainly long enough for the person who did (or was thought to have done - earthbound entities can be wrong) the wrong to have been reincarnated, and thus, if they do not believe in reincarnation / control, to fail to see how they could have done any wrong (I'm dealing with a situation a bit like that right now, actually, where someone suffering from karmic constraints said to me, when I pointed that out, "what wrong do you THINK I've done in a past life?!!!").
Ironically, this is the sort of influence that the Nine are trying to remove ("cleanse the realms around the planet Earth for the betterment of all").
The thing is, the sort of control I have been writing of for man years is something one can deal with - learn the basics I keep referring to, and you will be a good way towards controlling both your reactions and the actual events in your life. But if you keep portraying "the state of the world" as something that is big, mysterious and maliciously hidden, you're giving up any semblance of being in control of anything.
The world can be changed - both for the better, and for the worse: if it is to be for the better, we need:
- a more nuanced view of what constitutes "good" and "bad", especially with regard to size of government - for instance, I consider a world government potentially GOOD, if it can stop wars and violence (including the inherent violence of discrimination, the management of which is an area I consider the European Union to be better at than many smaller governments, and is a form of violence that directly stops the person in exactly the sort of ways that many anti-"big" government people are so concerned about [thus exposing said advocates hypocrisy and stupidity]);
- a more realistic understanding of what collective decision making means, and what it's benefits and weaknesses are - and it does have weaknesses (such as populism) which need to be acknowledged and addressed, to deal with regressive things like populism and the "demand" for monarchy (e.g., in Thailand, which has moved far away from democracy in recent years);
- a commitment to NOT opting out by doing things like claiming "the problem is too big", which is what the conspiracy nuts do, along with many spiritual people who focus exclusively on the personal; and
- a commitment to be informed and critically evaluation / thinking voters (no more Murdoch press!), to doing the psychic basics (flame, ground and shield, clear, etc - refer to my signature block below for more), and to doing whatever one can to contribute in a balanced positive way.
PS - another aspect here is people not accepting that others may be better than them. There is a bit of a mistaken attitude that people "all having the same inherent worth" means we "all have the same manifested value in all circumstances": that is a bit like claiming that everyone with two legs can potentially run - or, as some people would put it, all can potentially win - a marathon, and that is clearly utter nonsense no matter how much people train. Some people are better at, say, maths, and others at, say, domestic issues. It doesn't mean those people are worth less - or more, but it does mean that, if I want advice on maths, I will go to the maths expert, no matter how much the domestic expert feels put out by that, and if I want domestic issues advice I will go to that expert, no matter how much the maths expert is, say, dismissive. (Incidentally, I actually consider a lot of these problems have come about because of the biases - towards intellectualism and the superiority of paid work [although one needs money to pay the bills] - and/or stupid attempts to "motivate" that many teachers have made ... especially from the generations I grew up in.) If I want someone to take on a role as a political leader, I want them to have skills in leadership and good governance - I don't necessarily want them to be the nicest or most personally flawless candidate. If I was to choose someone to be a police officer, I want someone who is reassuring, not authoritarian, and understanding of people, not an addict to gung-ho mentalities and definitely NOT someone who could just as easily have been a crim. There is also the issue that people have not necessarily acheived all that they can be, and this applies particularly to matters of spirituality - if I want spiritual advice, it won't be from a rigid, judgemental old bigot in a frock and white collar (they're not all like that) nor a self-styled guru who is appealing to the pockets of the masses through populism and easy-sounding messages, rather than the hard grind of spirituality - and that is where the Nine have considerably more appeal to me than conspiracy nut jobs.
Love, light, hugs and blessings
I am revamping my former website, and getting at least one other underway (pronounced "new-MYTH-ear"; ... aka Bellatrix
Lux … aka Morinehtar … would-be drýicgan or maga
... )
My "blogiography" (list of all posts and guide as to how to best use this
site) is here, and my glossary/index is here.
I started this blog to cover karmic regression-rescue
(see here and here), and it grew ... See here for my group mind project, here and here for my "Pagans for Peace" project (and join me
for a few minutes at some time between 8 and 11 PM on Sunday, wherever you are,
to meditate-clear for peace), and here
for my bindrune kit-bag. I also strongly recommend
learning how to flame, ground
and shield, do alternate
nostril breathing, work
with colour, and see also here and be
flexible.
May the best in me, my Higher Self,
and those of the Clear Light who assist me,
help me to keep myself grounded, centred and shielded,
to be Balanced and a Fulcrum of Balance,
a centre of Balanced Positivity and Spiritual Maturity,
with my aura continuously cleansed, cleared and closed,
repelling all negative or unwanted energies,
whilst allowing positive, balancing and healing energies in and through.
The real dividing line is not between
Christianity and Islam, Sunni and Shia, East and West. It is between people who
believe in coexistence, and those who don’t.
- All of the above - and this blog - could be wrong, or subject to context, perspective, or state of spiritual evolution ...
Tags: activism, change, conspiracy theory, control, energy work, peace, personal responsibility, the Hierarchy,
First published: Sunnudagr, 10th July, 2016
Last edited (excluding fixing typo's
and other minor matters): Sunday, 10th July, 2016
