Post No. 2,113 - reflections on end-of-year reflections

The company I work at for my day job is having their end of year reflections / announcements, and they have been pretty much as expected - the difficulty of working under pandemic conditions (although what was not acknowledged was that the difficult was worse for those not comfortable with online communications rather than face--to-face - which more of a problem for extraverts than introverts), and ho much growth we'd made and how big the company was. 

I have to admit there were times when I was pleased to be able to get a big project "under my belt" / "on my CV", but those times are a couple of decades ago now, and I have never lost my enjoyment of being able to use my skills to help the smaller clients who often struggle because no-one cares or even thinks about them - the retirement village that is overwhelmed by having to deal with having an on-site wastewater treatment plant because they are outside any water authority's area but are subject to new environmental regulations, the landfill operator who wants to produce an extremely high quality of treated water but doesn't realise how expensive and difficult that it, or the small business who wants to do an environmentally sound expansion. 

We're not a charity, so I am expected to make a profit or at least not make a loss, but my manager helps me do as much as I can for these people - especially people like the retirement village (and I quite like the charitable organisation we have - I raised the issue of sending aid to the Philippines, where we have quite a few staff, following the recent typhoon and they were already onto that). 

But, in many key ways, the company's thinking reflects that of much of society - the "bigger is better" misconception. 

Unfortunately, this sort of "thinking" (it's really more of attitude, given the lack of awareness - especially around how much of this is unevaluated absorption from parents/key figures) is responsible (at least partly, and often to a significant degree) for many problems - including: 

• empires ("our city/nation/empire/religion must be bigger than theirs to ensure we survive" * , or "we must have more land to live in" * ); 
• the Industrial Revolution ("we can make more things than doing the old way" * ); 
• addiction to economic growth ("all living things grow, so the economy thing should as well" * ); 
• this; and 
• population growth ("our city/nation/empire/religion must be bigger than theirs to ensure we survive" * ).
  

The problems are not just the direct problems, there are flow-on problems as well - such as the suicides caused by the "space race", the paranoia and loss of transparency caused by the Cold War's arms competition ("we must have more nukes than them" * ), and the classism, fear of crime, and mistaken view that houses are a way to accumulate wealth rather than live securely that goes with wanting bigger houses and other material possessions. 

The one I have been thinking of particularly is population growth, which is commented on in some of the books I've been reading of late *** .

I've long had concerns about population growth, which causes problems such as: 

• clearing land (none of the advocates for allowing population growth that I've spoken to have made the connection that when you have more people, you need places for them to live, and that causes clearing and other environmental problems that these same people often object to); 
• environmental impacts (as well as finding places for them to live, you also need to feed them [historically, that need has also contributed to problems such as "slash-and-burn agriculture"]) which are far worse for those people living industrialised lives (and those raising this as a justification for allowing population growth never cut back their lives to the levels of environmental impact that they consider acceptable); and 
• overcrowding (which is rarely acknowledged as an issue by extraverts, people with no lived experience of [or even exposure to] discrimination against minorities, and people with an unacknowledged and unmanaged fear of being alone).
  

That last issue gets into the biggest problem here: our species' history of being genocidal ** . That deplorable, appalling history makes talking about population growth as a problem almost impossible - and yet, in terms of managing our impact on the planet and leaving it survivable, it is crucial to do so.

There are some encouraging signs. such as the decline in birth rates in a South American nation when characters on a soap opera decided to limit themselves to two children, but there are also examples of what doesn't work (such as China's one child policy, which was responsible for corruption and human rights abuses [see here, here, and here]) - and then there is the ever-present problem of so many people in the economics field advocating for growth. (Ironically, if we get away from our devastating addiction to economic growth, we are going to have to live with balanced budgets and no deficits - one of the main reasons people seem to be sanguine about debt now is that the debt becomes insignificant when measured against the size of a future, bigger economy . . . which will no longer happen under the scenario just mentioned.)

What is the solution? How do we talk about and avoid human rights abuses? 

I don't know. 

What I DO know, is that population growth and overpopulation are problems that we are not properly acknowledging or considering - and that failure to do so could be part of the killing us.

 * this is an example of the sort of stupid "bigger is better" attitudes mis-described as thinking that I despise. 

 ** see, from https://gnwmythrsglossary.blogspot.com/2021/12/human-rights.html: 

• http://lemkinhouse.org/about-us/life-of-raphael-lemkin/,   https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/coining-a-word-and-championing-a-cause-the-story-of-raphael-lemkin,   http://genocidewatch.net/2013/03/14/raphael-lemkin-defines-genocide-2/,   and   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin;
  and
  https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml,   https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/learn-about-genocide-and-other-mass-atrocities/what-is-genocide,   http://genocidewatch.net/2013/03/14/raphael-lemkin-defines-genocide-2/,   and   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide;
  and
  https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml,   https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/cppcg/cppcg.html,   https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CrimeOfGenocide.aspx,   https://www.history.com/topics/holocaust/what-is-genocide,   https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml,   and   https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C1949A00027;
  

 *** In particular, in Elena  Danaan's sci-fi novel "Resilience: Beyond the Impossible" 

Post No. 2,112 - the state of the world

I was talking recently to one of my sisters, and she was telling me about the string of problems they've had in the last six months or so. That actually triggered some thought on my part, as quite apart from the problems (health [including mental], economic, and other) caused by the pandemic, there are quite a few people who are going through a range of problems - some the result of flaws such as greed (leading to buying houses that are egregiously over-sized or over-flashy), others the outcomes of people coming to realisations that they should have a long time ago (such as the benefits of working from home, and that work is not everything), some the outcome of the nastiest, meanest and most cold-hearted (iron-hearted?) government we've ever had (certainly that seems to be so in the memory of living people - and I'm in the 60s and have talked to my elders on this), but others are matters that couldn't reasonably have been anticipated (such as certain forms of cancer). 

I'm aware that some people are stating that their opinion is the world is going to be "forced" through a significant evolutionary step forward (too often referred to as "ascension", with a disturbing implication that there is need / expectation of growth being continued on the other side of that), and I'm starting to wonder if there may be something to that . . . 

For my part, that doesn't change what I'm trying to do (which is: make the world a better place) nor the way I'm going about it (the work on this blog being a significant, but not the only, part of that), but it does incline me towards increasing my precautionary planning. 

Even if we get through the climate crisis with only a manageable amount of devastation (which is looking increasingly unlikely) and finally get this pandemic under control, the mental, emotional, and spiritual "challenges" may continue. 

In my case, my increasing age and deteriorating health is making doing all this harder as well, but I suspect the principle may apply to other people as well - live in accordance with the principles of minimalism, live sustainably (walk softly on the earth), follow credible advice on issues such as the pandemic, be BPM spiritual, look after yourself as best you can, and do what you can to be prepared for unexpected problems.

Post No. 2,111 - This week's Psychic Work

This week I am - again - going to repeat last week's work: 

Post No. 2,110 - Cross Posting: Democracy needs human rights

This originally appeared on my political blog at https://politicalmusingsofkayleen.blogspot.com/2021/12/democracy-needs-human-rights.html. 

*** 

Democracy is a system that ensures - or should ensure - that those without social power/influence have as equal a say in how they are governed as the powerful. 

This is intended to be accomplished through the "one person-one vote" principle - to me, that is the essence of democracy. 

However, some places undermine this by actions such as: 

• sexist or racist restrictions on who can vote (the original  forms of democracy excluded, for instance, slaves and women, and imposed other conditions - such as military training, or ownership of land - necessitating long struggles for voting rights [see here;  here, here, here, here, & here;  here, here, and here;  here, here, and here] );
  
• imposing qualifications that favour certain sections of society over others - as the USA has a history and current trend of doing (see here, here, here, here, here, and here); 
• or, in my opinion (IMO), giving businesses votes (see here, here, and here). My concerns with the latter are that (a) businesses, particularly large corporations, already have massive economic power (although individual small businesses don't), and (b) they are not people. 

(For others' thoughts on the topic, see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. There are also some points on the justification for democracy here and here, some criticism here, and useful thoughts on the evolution / development of democracy in this, this, this, and my post here [including the many links]. )

Democracy depends on a few aspects. Those that I wish to raise here (there are others - see the links in the preceding italicised paragraph) are:

• adequate education on democracy of voters - they need to know fundamentals such as: 
• elections are held, 
• the purpose of elections is "W" (usually, to elect representatives of the voters), 
• the rules around elections are "X",
• the duties / expectations / accountabilities / rules applying to elected representatives are "Y" (this also needs to cover what elected representatives and governments cannot do), and 
• when things go wrong, what can be done is "Z"; (this where an independent judiciary, which Geoffrey Robertson writes on clearly in this and this, becomes essential);
  
• Voters need to be capable of making reasonable decisions - which is not decisions that agree with others nor what others consider reasonable, but some sort of mature decision making process . . . and that validly be based on emotional reactions.
  
  This effectively means some people will be excluded from elections - for instance, the young (although there is debate about how low the voting age should be [a cut off no higher than military service, for instance - or perhaps the age at which criminal responsibility can be assigned would be appropriate . . . ], no-one would suggest a babe-in-arms or a toddler should be allowed to vote) or the clinically mentally incompetent, but must NEVER be judged on the basis of an FBU or FoC type reaction (the 1987 film "Nuts" illustrates some useful points on this).
  
  It should also be kept in mind that such cut offs can be arbitrary - I know young teenagers who are better able to decide who to vote for than I was when I started voting and who are better than many older, rigid thinking people (see also here and here).
  
  Other aspects of this are: 
• Voters need to be protected against undue influence - which is where the benefits of the secret ballot (see here, here, and here) become, IMO, self-evident. This is also one of the arguments against having a voting age that is too low - the risk that at least some children will not vote as they consider best, but as instructed by their parents . . . which is also a problem in some workplaces (I have heard managers say people "should" vote in a certain way) and some militaries (I have seen video of soldiers' ballots in an overseas nation being checked by their commanding officers).
  So this is an important principle, but one that needs to be universally respected, ensured and protected. 
• Voters also need access to accurate information.
  Typically, this is where a free press gets a guernsey, but . . . some parts of the free press shoot themselves in the foot (by either lurid gossip and personal abuse, or active proselytising of one political position) and that destroy the credibility of all the press.
  Social media is a mixed bag - it can spread rumours and conspiracy fantasies, but it can also aid in breaking through misinformation or bias from governments. 
• That last point also raises the issue of the way public debates are held on issues - e.g., the so-called postal vote on Equal Marriage (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here ) allowed - as expected - unconscionable conduct (overwhelmingly on the side of the haters) and created massive divisions, and appears to have been about the neoliberals' intention to give neochristian and similarly religiously motivated haters a big public voice to shout down and actively attack a minority who outnumbered the haters. That created massive divisions in our society - for instance, there are places, groups, and people I will avoid because of the vehement vitriol - rabid outpourings that were really about wanting people in all the LGBTIQ+ communities dead.
  

I am now convinced more than ever that we need strong human rights laws - they enable some protection against populism, and they also protect against discrimination (on that, we have no Bill of Rights in our constitution because most of the old white men who wrote it wanted to be racist against Chinese people). 

It also provides protection against rabid hate seen during the so-called postal vote, and other forms of direct  and  indirect discrimination (see also here, here, here, here, and here) against minorities - currently seen most clearly in conservative states in the USA.

On this, see also https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/12/14/human-rights-are-key-democracy.

Those who are discriminating against others on the basis of inherent characteristics (such as gender, sexuality, race, etc) or reasonable / benign and lawful choices (such as a non-harmful religion) are: 

(a) committing acts of active harm (equivalent emotionally to an "active shooter") that infringe on the freedoms of other people and rob society of the contributions of those people; 

(b) making gross mistakes (or "thinking" and emotion) that are at the babe-in-arms / toddler level of human evolution / development.

Now, people who have emotionally and mentally evolved through those basic levels also make mistakes, but those mistakes tend to be (i) subtler, and (ii) less damaging. They will still make mistakes - for instance, a political policy may be flawed - but they don't commit pogroms, massacres, and genocides, not create ghettoes nor slavery.

Those people making the gross mistakes are bigots - that term's generally disliked, but it means "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance ". [See PS]

The term fits, as does the reality of the harm they are doing. 

And that is where laws and an effective justice system come in. In the words of the great Dr Martin Luther King, Jr.:

It may be true that the law cannot change the heart, but it can restrain the heartless.

A legal / justice system is about ensuring that the powerful and/or bigotted do not inflict harm on minority groups, and that no other interference to the existence and efficacy of democracy (such as corruption or interfering with voting or any other key aspect of democracy [such as free press]) is permitted to occur. This covers more than only human rights violations, but our laws, here in Australia, are weakest on the human rights aspects, which is why I am raising the topic here.

There are a couple of other aspects I wish to touch on. 

Firstly, as Martin Luther King also said: 

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

We need to be active in ensuring justice occurs everywhere, much as we need to ensure the COVID-19 pandemic is properly managed everywhere, or the problems will affect us as well. This, it is good that we finally have a Magnitsky-style Act, but we now need to start using it. 

Secondly, there some other Martin Luther King sayings that merit consideration: 

Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity.
(The bigots are haters, and they are harming themselves.)

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
(Don't hate the haters - which is difficult when one has been deeply wounded or scarred by them.)

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.
(The struggles for improved suffrage and improved rights are not over, but we are better off than we were . . . say . . .  two centuries ago.)

The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral. Returning violence with violence only multiplies violence, add deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.
(Use of the legal system, and legitimate political activism and community education is the best - the only - long term solution.)

In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
(We need to ensure others get the benefits of justice and of genuine democracy as well - and we need to be effective allies along the way. No-one is safe against the current pandemic until everyone is safe - likewise with democracy and human rights.)

Finally, a court case against our Premier, who I consider has done a very hood (not perfect) job of getting us through the pandemic as a community as safely as possible, had a court case brought against him by an individual. 

The case has been thrown out, which I consider the correct decision, but it illustrates the following:

• the person was able to bring the case, which is an example of freedom; 
• the article mentions another person, completely separate to the person bringing this case, who has been declared a vexatious litigant because of their use of multiple court cases of little or no merit against public figures. The fact that it was considered that a law enabling such declarations to be made, along with the implementation of anti-corruption, anti-discrimination (including our newly minted Magnitsky-style Act), and similar laws shows that our democratic system is not perfect: it needs to continue emotionally and mentally evolving.
  

As do we. 

PS - since writing the above, which also drew on this and this, I have come across the concept of "the left brain interpreter" in Grant Cameron's book "Contact Modalities". This is a possibly plausible explanation for the mental rigidity of both bigots and pseudo-sceptics - for more on that, see here, here, here, here, and here. 

Post No. 2,109 - Reading and other links

I'm going to begin this with a reminder that the work of this blog is: 

• clearing nonBPM nonphysical  units (in a sense, doing the shadow work of the world), including doing spirit rescues,

and

• BPM  strengthening  BPM units - some nonphysical, some incarnated people . . . and one of, if not the, best ways that is done is strengthening people's connection with their own Higher Self (which is often not what they interpret as their conscience).
  

Having made that point, here are some links that you, Dear Reader, may find of interest or value: 

• a video on Buddhism's "three wisdoms"; 
• an article arguing that it is better to be single than in the wrong relationship ("what happens when we're not comfortable with ourselves is that we get into relationships that aren't right, because we're so scared of being alone"); 
• my thoughts on service provision in the age of the Internet; 
• an excellent and very interesting video by one of favourite channels on "atheist Pagans"; 
• "the virtue of honesty requires more than just telling the truth . . . any self-interested motive isn’t going to count as a virtuous motive for honesty";
  

Human rights related links that you, Dear Reader, may find of interest or value: 

• an EXCELLENT article on why public shaming of anti-vaxxers, as with public shaming of the obese, LGBTIQ+ people, etc - is not a good approach (the article acknowledges public health is a key determinant in this matter, as it balances the right to life of the many against the decisions of a minority [however, I consider those who turn to violence are not covered by this - they are actively harming others] ); 
• there is still opposition to allowing poorer nations effective access to vaccinations;
• an article saying the only realistic target to prevent serious climate change is a 75% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050, and as that is "more or less impossible", the only option remaining for governments is to minimise the change and help us prepare for what is coming;  
• Russia, home to a bunch of cyber ransom criminals, has vetoed a UN resolution on the obvious risk to security of the climate crisis;  
• Russia's long past genocidal invasion of Siberia . . . and its current abuses in Africa may now extend into Mali, to the tune of US$10 million/month;
  
• the EU has imposed sanctions on a Russian mercenary group;
• "human rights are key to democracy"; 
• "Statement from the Equal Rights Coalition on the nexus between democracy and the human rights of LGBTI persons "; as the Vatican belatedly and inadequately apologises for hurting some LGBTIQ+ people and France bans so-called "conversion" abuses, Hungary's homophobic PM plans a campaign that breaches international rights standards to appeal to neochristian bigots, the UK's rampant transphobia extends to their Supreme Court, and issues also occur in Thailand;
• a US ride sharing service has been caught being transphobic;
  
• the UN is asking questions about the effectiveness or otherwise of WA's proposed heritage protection act as more racism occurs in sport;
  
• a campaign is underway for mandatory "never to be released" sentencing of murderer-rapists (my thoughts are here);
• the damage caused by gender bias in teaching, and my home state's police force continues to fail on domestic violence as staggering revelations are released over a then serving police officers protection of child abusers;
• the devastating humanitarian disaster under misogynistic violent extremists in Afghanistan has seen families sell their children ...; 
• in a staggering crime against humanity, the Sudanese military used anti-aircraft weapons against peaceful protestors; 
• human rights abuses are continuing in Tigray, Ethiopia; 
  
• the US military has been accused of absolving itself over a drone killing of civilians;
• "the United States [has] imposed extensive human rights-related sanctions on dozens of people and entities tied to China, [Burma], North Korea and Bangladesh" - to their displeasure, and which we can potentially do also, now that we finally have a Magnitsky-style Act; 
• the growth of abuses and repression in North Korea under their current leader;
  
• declassified Israeli documents provide details of Israeli involvement in massacres of Palestinians in 1948 and the development of two tiered education - and Israel is still showing showing racist bias;
• the national neolib nitwits ableism continues;
• the role of moderates in preventing genocide; 
• staggering information on the number of submarines and the amount of military spending by Australia, China and the USA - now, and in the future;
• an opinion piece arguing that, in my nation, "little has been done to stop white-collar crime in the banking sector despite a number of inquiries and a Royal Commission into fraudulent activity";
• concerns that "the focus on China's rise ignores the weakening of the West";
• "greater protection is needed for civil society representatives who are increasingly being targeted in repressive and life-threatening environments, UN and regional human rights experts said in a joint declaration ";
• "People(s)-Centered Human Rights—A Necessary Framework to Counter Neoliberalism's Dangerous Contradictions"; 
• as a social media platform exposes spy companies and a sports organisations stays silent, the USA has "announced a partnership with Australia, Denmark, Norway, Canada, France, the Netherlands and the UK to try to stem the flow of sensitive technologies to authoritarian governments" - and an opinion that "it's time for democracies to protect dissidents from spyware" (also, a guide to avoiding defamation cases);
  
• an article reporting that India has "stifled dissent" (and discussion) on Kashmir;
• Denmark's hardline former immigration minister has been sentenced to jail over automatic (rather than checking for risk) separations of couples where one was underage;
  
• "time to end the ‘criminality with impunity’ of Australia’s immigration detention regime ";
  
• an article on the flaws and advantages of police use of facial recognition, with a simplistic recommendation for improving public confidence; 
• Lebanon has made a nominal only "attempt" to help "undocumented" workers; 
• an NGO is monitoring violations of housing laws in Lebanon;

 On journalism: 

• some of the media have FINALLY picked up on the fact that the anti-vaxxers are NOT popular with people in my home city.

Post No. 2,108 – This Week’s Psychic Weather Report and Work No. 0287

Black Lives Matter! Be Anti-Racist, Anti-Sexist, and Actively Inclusive in ALL Areas.
The Climate Crisis is real, urgent and existential!

The Pandemic is Real, and Vaccinations save lives. Stay safe - wash your hands, practice social distancing and wear a face mask in public, and follow informed medical advice - and be considerate towards those at risk or in situations of vulnerability (including economic) while the COVID-19 pandemic is a problem.

This week’s assessment is:

I have also found a live 24-hour display of output from the Global Consciousness Project, and https://acleddata.com/conflict-pulse/ and https://acleddata.com/early-warning-research-hub/global-threat-tracker/, which I will be referring to regularly as a supplement to this.

This week’s plan is:

My approach this week will be (incidentally, if you disagree, please use your own interpretations, or your own divinations [see the monthly “World Psychic Predictions / Remote Viewing" here for an example of other approaches):

Sunday: refer to map

Monday: refer to map

Tuesday: refer to map

Wednesday: refer to map

Thursday: refer to map

Friday: refer to map

Saturday: this day will now be reserved for rest, recuperation and healing – of all those who are trying in a BPM way to make this planet a better place.
May any and all healers who wish to contribute to this, take a few minutes to contribute to this goal on this day.

(The colours for the days are:   Sunday - gold,   Monday - grey,   Tuesday - orange,   Wednesday - green,   Thursday - blue,   Friday - purple.)

Routine Explanation / commentary

My “Magickal Battle of the World”, dowsing, and other courses on this blog can be found at https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/p/on-line-courses-on-this-blog.html.

There is an introduction / reminder / explanation about these posts here (and also see here for some investigation into evidence of the effectiveness of this type of work, which shows variability [and mentions causes] and cycles in the energetic/consciousness response), and some additional comments at the end of this post. Please also note that I hope this work will be taken up by a network of competent dowsers and BPM psychic warriors (also, this blog was created for spiritual reasons, including a course: this is just part of it). See also this excellent analysis on this topic.

As you read this, consider this: how does one outflank an idea, or attack an emotion in the rear? It is as well to consider what those who are unbalanced could do to good ideas and emotions, as well as considering BPM ways to outflank or “attack in the rear” bad ideas/emotions. Also consider geopolitics, and this mapping exercise.

Remember, the meditation (see here, here, and here) consists of:

 - appropriate and responsible protection (see here, here, here), prayer and ritual (e.g., here) to establish and check protection (re-do or re-schedule, if you don’t feel safe and secure);

 - establish a personal connection to higher BPM influences;

 - flush one's aura with emerald green, royal blue and royal purple;

 - fill one’s Heart Chakra (and maybe one’s Earth Star, Solar Plexus, Third Eye and Crown Chakras) with emerald green, royal blue and royal purple; send a weave of three streams of this colour from the Chakra(s) to a visualisation of a gigantic, multi-faceted emerald (which has been created to facilitate networking of BPM workers) through your facet until you see your energy enlivening other areas of the emerald and can feel similar energies flowing back to you;

 - visualise the rune / bindrune (if given - or, on Sunday, the group of symbols provided);

 - generate  feelings of love, peace, joy and respect;

 - strengthen those feelings (energies);

 - radiate those energies to the world for nine to eighteen minutes;

 - close your chakras, centre yourself and close your aura, use the banishing version of the LBRP to close circle, ground and release all excess energy; and make sure you are grounded and closed down – eat, if you need to, or seek help from someone capable and trusted. As a final point, note that your BPM family of choice (i.e., friends - especially those outside this area of your life) and BPM family will help keep your life grounded - but they must be BPM: as the Wiccan  Rede says “With a fool no season spend, nor be counted as their friend”. Similarly, you should focus on all that you love in life outside this work at the end of a session - and, if you have nothing else, you must broaden your life for the sake of being balanced and thus capable (and seek expert help, if necessary); and
 - make sure you are yourself again - free of any lingering attachments or (misguided) ideas of being subservient, respectful of yourself and your integrity as you should be of others.

Important note: although I show the flow of energy using arrows, they are really - to continue the weather chart analogy - more like the passage of a frontal system as shown on a synoptic (“weather”) chart. Also, if I ever miss doing a Psychic Weather Report, I have posted a standard, fall-back, default version here, which I will update from time to time when needed.

My changing the personality of oppressors and other world leaders post is here. It is also worth contemplating that one of the greatest weaknesses of those who oppose Balanced Positivity is the inherent pain, suffering and negativity of their aims and means – from the personal slights, insults and traumas left by the petty tyrant or autocrat, dictator or monarch or those oligarchs who are ruthless (some at least are not; some are BPM), through the social dislocation of the economic ideologue, to the long-lasting trauma, injury, death and desolation of society caused by those who use violence or war as a means to achieve power or impose their will. It may take time, but people WILL eventually realise what is not good, and will take action – which is why slavery is no longer ubiquitous, and why the march to freedom and democracy is underway – tentatively, and with backsliding and mistakes along the way, but inexorable nevertheless.

Also, if you’re interest is healing, I have changed the way I do these posts to more clearly show opportunities for doing healing.

In addition, those interested in providing protection for others always have a place – refer to the first item from yesterday’s summation of world events (details and link above), for instance.

Finally, a reminder that if none of this is of any interest to you, but you would still like to contribute energetically / psychically to making the world a better place, there are other options – for instance, this comprehensive list, and see also here (new, as of Oct., 2020), here, here, here, here, here, here, here (and here), here, and here – and, no doubt, many other places on the internet.

WLNGRHDMT

Black Lives Matter!
The Climate Crisis is real, urgent and existential!