Showing posts with label Deities of Service and Tutelage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deities of Service and Tutelage. Show all posts

Saturday, 11 April 2026

Post No. 3,426 - The Guidance of Those who Guide Us

driven by an unseen river, a tall waterfall - seen through the branches of trees to left and right in the foreground - cascades down a rocky face in the midground 

Photo by Michael McKay on Unsplash
(driven by an unseen river, a tall waterfall - seen through the branches of trees to left and right in the foreground - cascades down a rocky face in the midground) 

 

One of the interesting and often important aspects of spiritual growth is that we are guided - although we may not be aware of that. 

In the Pagan world, that may come from Deities of Service and Tutelage (which is often still less accurately, IMO, termed Matron/Non-Binary/Patron/Tutelary Deity), but many Pagans also accept the notion of Guides - or, as I term it in the interests of accuracy and safer use of language, BPM  Guides

That guidance is not “set in stone” - we have free will, and we can choose to ignore good advice just as we can choose to follow bad advice. 

But in addition to that, our Guides tend to be those most appropriate to our level of spiritual growth. 

To illustrate that with an analogy, you don’t use University professors to teach kindergarten. 

I have come across some people in spiritualist circles who try to claim their “Guides” told them to be bigots. Now, if that isn’t an outright lie, it may be incompetence - willingly allowing themselves to be misled by fake or nonBPM guides because it is more comfortable for them to be set in their ways of hate and exclusion-to-maintain-self-perceived-social-status. 

But there is the issue of level of awareness of BPM  Guides, particularly for those who will - foolishly - only accept guidance from former relatives

To illustrate this problem, I used the following diagram from my glossary definition of guides: 


It clearly is possible for some incarnate people to be more advanced spiritually than some Guides. 

This is often begrudgingly accepted by those bigots (which is someone who fits the definition of unevolved and/or lacking in growth spiritually) that such people may be walk-ins or some other excuse they use to maintain their comfortable-to-them ways of hate and exclusion-to-maintain-self-perceived-social-status (also termed spiritual bypassing, a notorious problem amongst those who ignore issues such as structural racism)

The points remain: 

  • valid BPM advice from BPM  Guides is socially progressive and inclusive; and 
  • some incarnate people may be more evolved than your BPM  Guides.  

 

Having emphasised that basic level piece of knowledge, there is another point to consider - and this, IMO, needs to be kept in mind by those in the UFO/UAP/ET field who have accepted that one of the main messages of BPM ETs is improving (raising or broadening) our consciousness: 

those who guide us are also receiving guidance (NOT step-by-step orders!) - whether from their Higher Selves, or more evolved entities, as that is a principle which applies all the way up to ... lets term it Source.  

The BPM ETs who are trying to get humanity to be more evolved, including nonviolent and NOT bigotted (exclusionary), also have their spiritual lessons to learn - although those lessons may be far beyond our comprehension.  

Those ETs and other spiritual guide should not be viewed as deity-like or considered to be owed unquestioning/unthinking (toxic) loyalty ... but they are also under no obligation to provide particular assistance or comfort when we face the consequences of rejecting their good advice (although they may choose to do so of their free will)

They know more than us and/or have a better perspective than us ... but that does NOT make them all-knowing nor an always perfect Deity.  



Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking” 
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Optionsor Ko-Fi 
Any and all support will be greatly appreciated, and will aid me in continuing this work
 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our MÓ•gan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  




 

Sunday, 31 August 2025

Post No. 3,239 - From a conversation with a friend

Photo by Greg Johnson on Unsplash  
(A farm field ready for sowing in the foreground leads to a home, farm structures, and trees in the midground, and a large, threatening tornado shows in the background, leaning over the farm buildings, against a dark grey sky)

 

I recently had a chat (by phone) with a friend I haven’t seen for a while, and that, and a few other matters, led to a few thoughts. 

 

The first is that it seems, or is too easy to assume (because of other examples of bad behaviour in corporations - particularly at the top), that too many - not all - of those who make enough money to retire without having to worry about money did by being the (rewarded) willing (or duped) of the neoliberal elites - the foot soldiers doing the bidding of their masters by pushing the limits of ethics and edging beyond decency. 

I also know others who didn’t behave that way and retired without money worries, but they had fairly ordinary, as-expected-by-conservatism lives - they haven’t taken on several sets of step- and foster-kids at critical (and expensive) stages of those kids’ lives, didn’t have partners who experienced major (including prolonged) health problems, didn’t relocate multiple times, didn’t see how flimsy and unsuitable Australian housing is and thus avoid buying any, and didn’t stir things up in the workplace by saying “no” to anything questionable (in other words, they were no Veronika from G Plus Animation)

The problem is, generations of conservative politicians have assumed everyone is from that conservative pattern (there have been progressive politicians who didn't - especially in my home state, but not enough at the national level), and that has left many people struggling to survive - making those conservative politicians a bit like the tornado in the above photo.  

 

Speaking of assumptions and conservatism in lifestyles, my friend and I also discussed transphobia - he (cisgender) has observed transmen don’t experience the levels of transphobia that transwomen do. 

Our chat covered that one of the major motivations for the hate thrown at transwomen is that some men are so insecure and patriarchal that they fear anything that they consider is not heterosexual is a risk to their macho identity (it is not what would be considered normal male identity), and thus they fear what a well known trans advocate refers to as “accidental homosexuality”. 

With regard to the hate shown by some cishet women, some of them consider the existence of transwomen a threat to their princess-in-pink-with-a-pony view of femininity (which, to be fair, transwomen and lesbians and biwomen are - thank the Goddess, but the concept is also a belittling insult to the billions of women in poverty or rural situations where such affected delicacy is not an option), and they are unwilling to keep their fantasies to themselves and their life and so they demand that everyone else goes along with their fantasies, including providing social status points and worship and an adequate number of opening-doors-for-them and reinforcing their fantasy femininity as the sole acceptable model of femininity (which it is to patriarchs, fascists, and the like)

To do that might also require them to grow  up enough to properly grieve the loss, or partial loss or modification of their life fantasy - which is something that EVERY person who is significantly different (whether through non-standard [according to patriarchy/fascism] sexuality or gender identity, or because of disability, non-standard life cycle, etc, etc, etc) has had to do. 

 

The next point, in reaction to an online YouTube video, is that I have chosen two of my eleven Deities of Tutelage or Service (Matron/nonbinary/Patreon Deity) - the others chose me, which is a process that Druid  John Beckett has written about quite eloquently at Under the Ancient Oaks. As a result of them choosing me (and was reluctant to accept service with two for some time), my Deities of Tutelage or Service come from a few different pantheons. So, based on my experience, my opinion is that to be too reductive and argue that people must choose only from one pantheon is arbitrary and often unnecessary (and sometime necessary for some people). Furthermore, people with advanced or complex spiritual obligations often need the additional help of other Deities to accomplish their life tasks (which is something I first came across in my days trying out Spiritualism, with my teacher at that time often saying people who had taken on more tasks were likely to have more guides and helpers to help accomplish that task).  

However, it could also be that people have a large task that is located within only one area, and thus may have one or a few Deities of Tutelage or Service/Guides/helpers/etc because their large/advance task is focused on a few skills, not many.  

Don’t make ANY assumptions either way based on arbitrary matters such as numbers of anything. 


Finally, as I have written elsewhere (including here), I retired from my day job a few years ago (and my professional registration will expire in a few months yay!). Others have also perhaps officially retired, but are still going - and Robert Reich is a key example, for the reasons he wrote about here (largely the poor state of the world as a result of USA’s current Autocrat-in-Chief).  

I am also having to resume work for a number of reasons, and one significant part of that is associated with my work here and on SubStack: basically, I have more spiritual work to do - more obligations to fulfill (although I won’t get through all this list, nor will I try with many of those)

So, time for another cuppa and bit more work ...  



Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking” 
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Optionsor Ko-Fi 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our MÓ•gan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/