Post No. 2,912 - A multi-level perspective on runes

As I mentioned in “Post No. 1,429 - Rune book project: “Runes in Space””   https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2019/10/post-no-1429-rune-book-project-runes-in.html , one of my projects (currently on the backburner) is a book on runes.

One of the reasons that is on the backburner, apart from the usual health/energy limitations, is that the rune book market is well and truly saturated, but I want to write more about microrunes, which I have only ever been taught by friend “Rune Master from the Bush” (Tony), and have not read anything about. 

Thinking about that topic, and the concept of meridians (“ley lines in the human body”, perhaps?), has given me a new perspective that I also wish to explore - beginning by a quick post here and now to help ensure the concept comes in to this physical realm: 

much as the meridians mapped on to the human body which are used for acupuncture and traditional shiatsu are the external (visible) parts of a looped pathway, with the end of the external meridian looped back to the start via a pathway inside the body and passing through the organ/unit (some have no physical organ) the meridian is named after/associated with, 

I consider that it may be possible that microrunes give a way to link each rune to the northern European creation myths, and that this may involve a looped inner plane (nonphysical) flow of energy as well as an external flow pattern shown by the rune shape.

This will require me to re-appraise what I have already written about microrunes (see my post linked above for an example of what has been done on that so far), possibly in the form of an additional sub-section. 

It also, in my opinion, indicates the following: 

as runes are built up as indicators of manifestation - i.e., creation, the only appropriate form of destruction is whatever is an equivalent of natural recycling. 

Thus, death by natural means such as age is acceptable, but killing is not - it robs the individual and the whole of the resources of the victim and what they could have manifested as they flow through life. Harm that is necessary - such as the equivalent of lancing a boil or regeneration using BPM techniques is acceptable, but sadism, torture, coercion, forced existences of low/bad quality, etc is contrary to the creative principle embodied in runes and thus is not - and is, in fact, evil.

This also, I suspect, applies to other divinatory tools. 

It is quite late at night here, so I won’t go any further into this for now.

For more on this, see my posts under the following labels:   

• https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/search/label/runes   

• https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/search/label/bindrunes   

• https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/search/label/microrunes  
  

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:

• there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
• I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
  

 

If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram. 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here. 

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  

 

Post No. 2,865 - Connecting to spirit

There are a range of techniques for connecting to the nonphysical - rituals, meditations, etc. 

Those techniques tend to build up a certain nonphysical strength as they are used more - almost like creating a group mind (aka egregore) or thought form. 

Stronger techniques may be easier for new people to connect to and use, as they are not creating the totality of the connection from scratch ... provided the nature of the connection is something that is compatible with them. 

At this point, I'll remind you, Dear Reader, that not being compatible with something does not automatically mean it is evil (although rarely that may be the case - more often it is people camouflaging their personal dislike/pettiness under a veneer of something that is supposed to be better): it is more like two colours/flavours/scents that are fine on their own, or in other combinations, but not in that combination.

That may mean people are sometimes better off working on their own, or using techniques that are unorthodox - although protection and checking should always be used. 

This rough sketch illustrates the concept I am referring to for an individual: 

This is what the situation could be like in a group context, showing some of the individual variation, and that one person may be personally better off alone - although they should, in my opinion, consider working in a group anyway, for the benefit of others: 

Having now made this post I may post about some of the more unorthodox techniques I use that work well for me because it is easier for me to adapt something I have used for half a century than try to learn something completely unfamiliar (and likely that has no resonance for me). 

(I have actually posted quite a few ... “unorthodoxies” over the years already.)

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:

• there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
• I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
  

 

If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram. 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here. 

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/