Post No. 259 - Does rescue involve lying?

The short answer to that is - in the STRICTEST sense - yes, but before I elaborate on that I'd like to give a few links to make sure we are on the same "page" - or at least understanding what page we are on:

• a post on the general notion of taking action or not;
• a post about bullying and ways of standing up to them:
• a post about protecting one's home (could it be better, perhaps, to remove the threat?);
• another post about protection;
• my first specific post about protection;
• a post about people who avoid positive energy;
• a post about the need for rescue (including, by inference, uncooperatives); and
• my post about rescuing uncooperatives.

My view of reality is very much based on the notion that we are here to learn to be better people. A key part of that is, unfortunately, learning things "the hard way" - which means experiencing the consequences of our actions, good and bad (which is effectively what karma is about - see here and here). Combine that with the notion of protection (see the above post), and you can get to the point of view where someone who is harming others may have to be stopped for the overall good (the "Highest Spiritual Good"). If you do not think that is so, then in my opinion you are supporting the view that maniacs with guns can go on killing sprees and no-one is allowed to stop them in the interests of other people's safety and/or wellbeing.

The astral equivalent of that may not be as visible to most people, but DESPITE THAT the harm is JUST AS REAL (and possibly of longer lasting effect). Similarly, the agreement about basic rules of conduct ("laws") also exists, albeit at the level of your innermost self: your Higher Self.

Thus, subject to developing enough verified psychic ability to check what is happening and needs to be done with those in the spirit world who are guiding those in this world, rescue of uncooperatives (i.e. against their will) is something that I consider morally and ethically justified AND NECESSARY. In fact, I consider failing to perform the rescue of an uncooperative when you can is tantamount to LETTING - or even aiding and abetting - the aforementioned armed maniac murder other people.

In fact, I consider those who think everything can be done in the nice, pleasant way the character Melinda Gordon (played by Jennifer Love Hewitt) does in the TV series "Ghost Whisperer" to be naive.

So, how does lying fit into this?

Well, it is more those who are borderline uncooperative. Uncooperatives I have no problem confronting, and if they choose to resist passing over to the higher astral, then they will be forcibly placed in a portion of the lower astral [1]. That is not a pleasant experience [2], but at least they have been removed from a level of reality where they can and will influence incarnate people, animals, plants and places - possibly against the free will of said incarnate people, animals, plants and places.

Cooperatives are those people who, by a combination of talking/counselling/healing (the approach most people know about in terms of rescue) and changing the environment (which most amateurs don't know about, and covers things like channelling a male entity through a female medium [or vice versa], changing the weapons of soldiers who are still fighting into bunches of flowers, etc - see the description of "scene rescue" here for more on this), can be persuaded within a reasonable time and expenditure of energy to move from earthbound to passing over to the astral worlds. Their largest problem is lack of awareness of being dead - and the denial of even being able to feel arms or legs described by the character Molygruber in Lobsang Rampa's book "Three Lives" is a very good explanation of that.

Uncooperatives, in my experience, almost universally have some level of awareness of their death, or their ability to influence others. They may in fact be permitted to do so for a period of time as part of the karmic return of the person who harmed them (hence, for instance, a murderer/rapist/bully may experience being haunted), or possibly as part of the prelude to healing for the victim, but there comes a time when the earthbound entity needs to move on. They may, for instance, have started affecting innocent people who simply bear, for instance, some physical similarity to the person who harmed them (which has happened to me: I can recall one entity who attached himself to me simply because my hair looked like that of his former wife).

There are people who are borderline between cooperative and uncooperative: trying to do a cooperative rescue may take a rescue session several days or weeks long (which is not practical), and they still have to be stopped from harming others. Well, it is possible to change to doing an uncooperative rescue, but I know what that experience is like (as, I can guarantee, does almost every single person reading this from previous lives!): if I can, perhaps, "trick" them into moving over cooperatively, perhaps by telling them a white lie (or, for instance, agreeing to one of their guides presenting with the image of someone they know and respect or love, or perhaps the creation of a thought form of their notion of "heaven" [3]), then I would rather do that than condemn them to being placed in the lower astral.

One example of that comes from a recent rescue I did while clearing up influences making a back problem I had worse. One of the entities who was affecting that was a pilot who had died in the Second World War. His last sensation was of the excruciating sensation as his back was broken. Being earthbound with that sensation was something he had to go through karmically, as in several previous lives as a soldier, he had deliberately broken several people's backs. Now, his sole awareness was limited to that pain. Could we put healing in? No - he did not believe such things were possible, and rejected several attempts to help him that way. Would he accept the image of a doctor from the Second World War? Yes, but - partly out of his guilt, which he was aware of on some less conscious (to the "earthbound him"), and partly out of knowing the limitations of medicine from the time of his last life, he did not believe that his pain could be relieved. So we - we meaning HIS DLF Guides, my DLF guides and I, working together - told him a white lie: we said medicine had advanced and could now fix his back. That got his attention enough for us to get him out of that earthbound situation, and into what he perceived as a hospital, as part of the healing and education process before he moves fully into the astral.

So ... can rescue involve lying? Yes.

Is it ethical behaviour? Yes. Something to think on ... and feel free to disagree :)

Love, light, hugs and blessings

Gnwmythr
(pronounced "new-MYTH-ear")

Notes:

1. Keep in mind that your Higher Self may have chosen for you to spend a certain amount of time earthbound after your incarnation. When that time is up, it is acceptable, right and for your own benefit to pass over. If you choose to fight against that, and wind up being moved from earthbound (i.e. on the etheric plane) to the lower astral against your (Higher Self) choice, lower self you will be creating negative karma for yourself.
2. There some interesting descriptions of this in Joan Grant's book "Winged Pharaoh", which is another book I hope to review.
3. Such elaborate through forms are usually inhabited by entities, but some detail will not be quite right (e.g. Rampa mentioned, as an example, the movement of "angels" does not connect to the rhythm of their wings) and eventually the person will call out to see the truth, and will do so.

Tags: cooperative, earthbound, ethics, Lobsang Rampa, rescue, uncooperative

First published: Tysdagr, 3rd May, 2011

Last edited: Tuesday, 3rd May, 2011