In terms of channging the world, theotheme that is coming out most clearly of late is that theooligarchs in chargeoof theoworld are usingopatriarchy,oneoliberalism, andoauthoritarianism toocontrol the peoples of the world.
For theoweak-willed,ounethical,oscared-of-noncompliance sockopuppets in that system, the main problem is maleofear ofohomosexuality - in particular, that other males might consider them effeminateoorogay, which fear is then used to violentlyobrutalise and controlvother men. Second to that is the fear of SOMEowomen that they won’t be “lookedoafter” / “respected” for their stereotypicalobreeder-and-raiserorole (which is different to the genuine desire to be a parent - something held by members of ALL genders), which fear is also used to brutallyopolice other women and other genders.
Every individual choosing to be as self reliant as they can is, IMO, one of the key ways to address this set of problems. As an example of what that could entail, even in good relationships I consider both (but particularly women) should have sufficient reserve of money and other resources to be able to leave the relationship if they choose to - which can be used as an example to encourage the same in bad relationships, and thus give women and children an escape mechanism from bad relationships. The problem with that, of course, is that four decades of amathiac, slavering sock puppet adherence to serve-the-wealthy-at-the-expense-of-everyone-else neoliberalism has made having enough money to survive impossible for many people, let alone having even a reserve for a rainy day, much less an escape reserve.
I would refer to the suggestion that we all implement UBIs here, but
(a) our politicians and public servants lack, IMO, the imagination, intellectual rigour, ethical honesty, professional capability, and emotional competence to cope with the suggestion, let alone honestly assess/plan for such a matter (noting the success of trials to date ... any politicians/public servants who disagree with my opinion please feel to demonstrate otherwise);
and
(b) voters are, in the main, so paranoidoandosmall, nastyominded shadows of who they should be after four decades of dog-eat-dog induced paranoia and bad faith that they would never vote in a government that would do that (which may change after massive job losses from AI, but that will be a situation where fewer people need to considered and the number of voters will be reduced, owing to increased death rates from the job losses - as well as the climate crisis).
Still, the current artificial cycle needs to be broken, and, to that end, I would suggest implementing, and supporting (as much as you can, at any rate) the following:
- developing critical thinking, emotional competence, and the ability to recognise rhetoric/advertising-type manipulation, no matter what your age or circumstances;
- rejecting stereotypical gender roles in favour of autonomy (again, to the extent possible);
- rejecting all opinions, actions, and attitudes that are controlling of others in the sense of enforcing conformity to what the patriarchy/neoliberal oligarchy wants;
- having Members of Parliament who voluntarily chose to serve no more than one term at a time, to reduce their vulnerability to commercial-interests lobbying;
- talking about the benefits of UBI as a response to AI; and
- for those who follow this blog, doing the work of this blog on these matters.
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlightopossible flaws / issues youoshouldoconsider:
- there mayobe flawedologicaloarguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ freeoonline course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinkingocaps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
Gnwmythr
teaching the "good" (balancedopositive and spirituallyomature [BPM])
safer and more effective ways to counter the "bad" (outoofobalance, spirituallyoimmature [nonBPM/antiBPM])
IMO, OTAAT (“one term at a time”) is the next action to save representative democracy, along with establishment of an organisation of human-rights observing democracies as a functional alternative to the UN (especially the veto-sabotaged UN SC), along with all organisations being run using the seven "business" principles listed here, but also note this and this “Vision for Humanity”
If you’re new here, consider looking at the Landing Page for Newbies
If you appreciated this post, pleaseoshare it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon,
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi
Any and all support will be greatlyoappreciated, and willoaid me in continuing this work
Remember: we generallyoneed to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgenderingois an act of activeotransphobia/transmisiaothat puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptoroto prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).
#PsychicABetterWorld and may all that I do be ofovalue and actively BPM used for and byothe nonphysical BPM because #KindnessIsThePoint
Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear
Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026 NO AI I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. AI was NOT used to write this article. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
%20-%20Laura%20Tempest%20Zakroff.jpg)

.jpg)