Something I come across in the religio-spiritual and nearby/adjacent communities is people who want to have a particular physical heritage because they think it will confer special powers or prestige (“pop”, for the purposes of this post) on them.
That is nearly as amathiac as those who think eating the remains of a vital creature will confer, in addition to physical protein etc, some measure of the special vital powers of that vital creature.In actuality, you are more likely to receive some of the anger and fear and panic that Sentient Being experienced as it was killed, than anything else.
To those who quest for special genetics:
- there are memberships of Indigenous groups that may be based, or based in part, on physical heritage (such as my own heritage - but First Peoples here [in Victoria, Australia] do NOT go down that path, as it is doing the colonisers’ genocidal work of breeding us out of existence for them);
- there are genetic and epigenetic inheritances from parents and grandparents, but as those are traced back further, they are being combined with other genetic and epigenetic characteristics from other ancestors and are less likely to be significant;
- human physical survival is based, in part, on a wide mixing of genetics, to ensure we do NOT become inbred - which was a notable issue for, if I recall correctly, European monarchies;
- choose any famous person in history, and, if they had children, their DNA etc will be spread out and mixed with other people's DNA etc through a wider and wider group ... and at some stage:
- the mixing makes the "special" presence meaningless; and
- in ALL cases, the other vitally important aspects such as
(a) nurturing,
(b) the circumstances of that incarnation's existence, and
(c) what we bring into this life through who our Soul/Higher (Innermost/Truest) Self is and what our Soul/Higher (Innermost/Truest) Self has been through in previous incarnations - which is a similar error of misunderstanding/amathia to that shown by the carnists,
needs to be taken into account.
In short, I am wary of seeking some special psychic or character “pop” through physical genetics - in fact, I do not believe it will work, unless you are also close enough to the person to share in family and other circumstances (e.g., sibling or child of that person), but there will still be major differences.
Spiritual heritage in terms of who taught you in this lifetime is different: that is similar to checking whether someone obtained a degree from a genuine credentialed university or a fly-by-night dodgy operation.
The problem is that there is no agreed, independent, objective award of credentials similar to that applying to universities - although traditions such as Reiki or specific Pagan/Wiccan paths will manage who they approve in accordance to their internal requirements.
It also gets more complicated if you look at someone's true spiritual heritage, which involves the past incarnation and other (while not incarnate) experiences of the person and their Guides, and who their Deities of Service and Tutelage are.
Now, what led to me writing this post was coming across a few sites which claim to provide information about people’s “starseed lineage” - basically, their history of “incarnations” (some are nonphysical existences).
Having made the points in the preceding, my comments on that are:
- just as on Earth, every race or species (and I know the Zetas, for example, have scores of sub-divisions) off Earth is not a homogeneous block. There are variations - many individual - at any one time, and there are also variations that have occurred over time.
To use an earth analogy, having had a past life as a pre-Celtic European means you will not have any access to Celtic “pop”, and having past lives as a Celt is likely to involve changes as they moved from wherever they did come from to what is now modern day France and the UK.
If you have had a past life as particular ET species, that may not mean anything comparable to what that species is like these days;
- the attributes identified to each species tends to vary slightly for each channel, and that, in my opinion, reflects:
(a) the flawed channelling of each person trying to do this work and, in some cases, errors where they are trying to repeat or build on other people’s work; and
(b) the (human) flaws of allowing personal and/or cultural worldview to influence channelling - especially concerning the gender spectrum (this is something that only Elena Danaan, IMO, came anywhere close to getting right [and keep in mind that we do change physical sex/gender over series of lives, and many interpretations/ascription of meaning of polarity are inherently flawed], but I do know there are transphobes and homophobes [and racists and misogynists] in the UFO/UAP/ET field);
- these quests often miss the important result of us being, in some way, holograms of the entirety of existence, which is: we can quite possibly access the skills/attributes we admire/desire by learning how to meditate and/or use the assemblage point and/or get good BPM guidance.
Such access is easier and deeper if you have had a past life as or in the desired/admired species, especially if they past life is recent rather than distant past, but NOT having such contact does NOT make access impossible - although you will still have to comply with normal good manners and respect, and that may involve being subject to to limitations on some aspects (which incidentally, may also apply even if you have recent or current lives ... so knowing something doesn’t mean you get to blurt it from the [digital] roof tops), but consider also that, in many cases - ESPECIALLY ET SPECIES - there are open teachers present here now, which is WHY you probably know about the skills/attributes you admire/desire.
As a First Nations example, consider “The Dreaming Path: Indigenous Thinking to Change Your Life” by Paul Callaghan and Uncle Paul Gordon (Pantera Press, Neutral Bay, NSW, 2022, ISBN 978-0-6487952-7-8; Amazon, Readings, Apple), which I have mentioned here, here, and here.
In summary, information about any one of our past heritages can be useful or empowering, but the lack of a desired or admired heritage does NOT have to be disempowering: it just means you have to work at developing the desired skill/attributes/knowledge, just as with the overwhelming majority of the rest of us.
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlightopossible flaws / issues youoshouldoconsider:
- there mayobe flawedologicaloarguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ freeoonline course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinkingocaps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
Gnwmythr
teaching the "good" (balancedopositive and spirituallyomature)
safer ways to counter the "bad" (outoofobalance, spirituallyoimmature)
If you appreciated this post, pleaseoshare it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon,
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi
Any and all support will be greatlyoappreciated, and willoaid me in continuing this work
Remember: we generallyoneed to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgenderingois an act of activeotransphobia/transmisiaothat puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptoroto prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).
#PsychicABetterWorld and may all that I do be ofovalue and actively BPM used for and byothe nonphysical BPM because #KindnessIsThePoint
%20-%20Laura%20Tempest%20Zakroff.jpg)
Kindness Revival Sigil - Laura Tempest Zakroff
Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear
Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. AI was NOT used to write this article. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
.jpg)
