There was also a serious debate about natural change processes, which is a bit like the amathiacs who think the current human induced climate change is just a slightly bigger natural variation in carbon dioxide levels, only more reasonable. That debate also covered things like using what is now described “indigenous / cold” burn offs to control the risk of too much vegetation leading to an uncontrolled fire (what I would describe as the balanced position) vs. never burn off at all (the unmitigated "preservationist") vs. hot fire burn offs (as advocated by authority, but not supported by adequate resources and rather missing the point).
These thoughts came to mind as I considered the rabid reactions of the uber-conservatives to measures designed to keep LGBTI kids alive in schools, and I realised they are, as with John Howard’s white picket fence mentality, the political equivalent of the stereotypical environmental preservationist: they don’t want ANY CHANGE AT ALL past their mythical Golden Age of the 1950s (where, a bit like people with their head in the sand and the Hitchhiker's Guide to Galaxy’s “Ravenous Bugblatter Beast”, they think that, because they didn’t see it, things like domestic violence and “homosexuality” didn’t exist ... whereas that enforced invisibility was itself actually part of the problem), whereas conservatives are resistant to change, but have supported good change - as an example, the decriminalisation of male homosexuality was done by the - misnamed - Liberal Party, who are our conservative party. They - the conservatives - have even advocated for change that, whilst I consider it often harmful or favouring the elites, is still change.
So ... I will now start to refer to the current batch of political reactionaries as what they are: preservationists, not conservatives.
[2] Please see here, here, here and my post "The Death of Wikipedia" for the reasons I now recommend caution when using Wikipedia. I'm also exploring use of h2g2, although that doesn't appear to be as extensive (h2g2 is intended - rather engagingly - to be the Earth edition of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy").
Love, light, hugs and blessings
- All of the above - and this blog - could be wrong, or subject to context, perspective, or state of spiritual evolution ...
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram.
Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.
Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative
Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/