Thursday, 28 November 2024

Post No. 2,944 - Why those advocating for UAP disclosure are lacking in credibility: the inclusion of rabid bigots

This is one of the main reasons that those advocating for UAP disclosure are lacking in credibility: the inclusion of rabid bigots. 

Is this accepted by those in the UAP disclosure because those UAP disclosure people are: 

  • ignorant or uninformed? (In this day and age, after decades of modern activism and more than a century of scientific research???!!!!!  And yet at least one YouTube political commentator seems to also have that exact problem ... )   
  • also transphobic bigots? (This is one issue where silence is agreement - and the retired admiral has actively made amathiac comments about trans people.)
  • religious bigots? (I wonder this about a noted lawyer with Vatican connections in particular - and note both my comment about silence above and the Vatican's appalling history on homo-/transphobia, bi-erasure, misogyny, SA, CSA, etc)
  • lacking in basic human qualities and competencies?

Those pushing for genital inspection are basically r_p_sts/child ab_ s_rs

This sort of backwardness (see here) is also actively preventing open contact.



If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and theres also Instagram

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and   

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2024     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/