Thursday, 10 April 2025

Post No. 3,081 - [Content Warning - discussion on trauma and abuses] A spiritual perspective on the damage being done by US deportations

Note that my language is likely not going to be as restrained as I normally try to make it.

I’m going to start with a smaller in scale, perhaps, problem that I have written and spoken about for many years now: 

the damage done by executions

What happens is - when a crime was actually committed - a person who did a terrible deed, probably because of some terrible flaw in their character (but circumstances also have a major impact * ), has had their will, pain, and entire physical being and closest to physical non-physical expressions of existence (i.e., etheric, lower & middle astral) forcibly subjugated to the cold, heartless, and inflexible will of an utterly impersonal system and its utterly impersonal, possibly vindictively sadistic, hateful cogs. 

When they die, they will die filled with their original pain and flaws, and with the additional RAGE against how they were treated. 

If someone who is innocent is executed (and that has happened many times), the cycle of hate and rage is started by those who claim they are trying to prevent crimes ... (or by any sadists who have snuck their way into that system) 

In-between lives, they go to the higher levels of astral that we do not access while alive, and there they will experience SOME healing because of the circumstances - a little like   ...   the relief a torture victim feels when the torture stops,   ...   or someone whose hearing has been damaged by prolonged exposure to loud noise feels when they leave the noise, but NOT all of the damage is healed   - OR   the relief someone who has pushed themselves physically into accomplishing a major goal (perhaps a weightlifting target) feels when they stop - but they may have created a hernia which will become a major problem later   ...   or   the relief of a soldier rotated out of front line duty to the rear trenches or for a time of rest and recovery. In those higher levels, we interact more directly and actively with the Higher Self of people, but that rarely continues into the next incarnation (it can, but is rare).

I know this because of:   (a) my personal experiences with past life regressions (e.g., discovering my claustrophobia was caused by drowning in a submarine in a previous life, which perspective was sufficient to 90% end that problem in this life);   (b) because of being part of other people’s past life experiences (e.g., a friend’s daughter had a fear of the dark, which was caused by the fear she had caused as a warrior in a previous life who used sneak attacks to kill members of enemy tribes in the night - and, again, the regression was sufficient to remove that problem as a problem from her life);   (c) from communicating with (some of the) discarnate entities who were stuck (i.e., earthbound) after life (and those people who have problems with the concept need to do shadow work and possibly regressions to find out [and fix] why they have such illogical denials - which could be the pain of having been forcibly held back by others, or that they have done that to others, or a little of Column A, a little bit of column B ... or a desire to make sure people who die do NOT do so in a state of fear, which is admirable, but irresponsible) about their experiences as I performed trance  rescue for them (I was the medium, often deep trance, and that often gave me the option of experiencing what they had been through at times - NOT always, and it was an option my BPM Guides gave me, not something compulsory) and their regrets about their choices towards hate and/or away from love;   and   (d) from my many discussions with my BPM  Guides and other entities who are guiding and helping me. 

The end result of this is that, in their next life, they will come back into incarnation having to deal with both their original set of flaws/issues, and the additional set of flaws/issues (or just the second set, in the case of innocents who are murdered by the state)

The likelihood that they will become someone who is law abiding, let alone someone who values life, are so close to zero it may as well be considered nil. 

(And the amathiac claims that it prevents murder are specious rubbish that objective people examining REAL data and/or sensible arguments [such as the lesson the state is providing about the {lack of} value of life by taking other peoples’ lives] already know - and have known for centuries, in some cases.)  


Next, let’s consider: 

war

The experience of most people in combat involves fear and anger and hate. How do I know that? From:   (i) talking to people who have served (such as an uncle in my adoptive family, passed for some decades now, who admitted to killing [or seeing killed - he never said {admitted?} he did this himself] Japanese prisoners during World War Two  combat in Papua  New  Guinea);   (ii) personal conversations with people who have passed over - see above about my spirit rescue work;   (iii) by reading “Road of Many Ways” by “John” (Bennu Books, 1975), which was about the experiences of a soldier who died, was rescued, and then performed other rescue work;   and   (iv) from personal past life recall, and discussions with those who are BPM aiding me. 

One thing which needs to addressed here is the comment about respecting, or admiring, or having good regard for one’s enemy combatants. That is probably best exemplified by what is referred to as the  Christmas  truce from World War One, but also by some of the healing meetings of former combatants after war (and an ex- of mine was someone I had shot down in my previous life)

That is a very real effect, and it shows that those experiencing it have at least the chance of coming out of the experience of combat without corrupting their soul, but ... it DOES  NOT  HAPPEN  FOR  EVERYONE

Given how treasured such experiences are, I am of the opinion that it is rare - if it was commonplace, no-one would make a fuss about it. 

People who are grappling with flaws, or who are unwilling conscripts (not all conscripts are unwilling - some wait to make sure their family will be provided for, for example), or both, are less likely to experience that ... transcendent state of being. 

And the damage done by being part of killing will remain, even for those who do experience that transcendent state of being. 

How do I know that? The usual list from above - but I also want to, in particular, I want to acknowledge and credit my uncle and one other veteran I know who both dealt with the damage caused to them by combat ** to the extent that they could start to let their heart’s light show - still flawed human beings, in many ways, as we all are , but examples of people who are starting to break out of that damaging cycle of war. 

And, on the cycle aspect, I know (from communicating with earthbound entities as they were being rescued) that a significant number of the troops in the Iran-Iraq war had previously fought each other on the Eastern  Front during World War Two. 

It is also noteworthy that the numbers involved in that second conflict were far less than those in the first, which is an indication that most people are able to deal constructively with the problems caused by their experiences ... but some cannot or do not ...


Now, let’s move on to ... 

those who use / advocate for externally forcefully imposed discipline

In the overwhelming majority of cases, these do NOT do anything constructive

They are just like those who beat a non-human animal into submission: all you get is a sentient being that is cowed into focusing on what will avoid abuse / possibly get a rewarded from the abuser. 

It certainly does NOT result in beings who are capable of applying all their abilities for whatever the abuser wanted, as those gits were buried deep under the surface of trying to survive. 

To illustrate that with an example, suppose someone was a gifted and creative mechanic before being crushed. Creativity needs certain conditions, including security and safety, to flourish, so all that will happen after being crushed is that the victim will timidly reach into their creativity and select NOT WHAT WOULD BE BOLDEST AND MAY BE BEST,  but what is most likely to avoid the further infliction of pain.  

Another endemic outcome from this problem is the amathiac who says “you should know you can trust me, even if I do Y or Z without your consent” (a nasty incompetence/excuse found too often amongst people who do searches of people, but also the misguided amathiac who says “let me feel up your hernia”). A variation of that is “this if for your own good/alleged safety so any trauma you genuinely feel can be ignored by me as if it didn’t exist”.

Many of those advocating for externally forcefully imposed discipline are NOT doing so because the best of them genuinely considers that approach to be best, but because saying that is most likely to take them beyond being abused or suppressed - possibly to even getting the safety of an approving message from their abuser. 

And that’s it. 

There’s NOTHING good about externally forcefully imposed discipline - there IS, however, much that is BPM about encouraged (including by lived-as-an-example) self discipline, but that is an entirely different matter. 

The other MAJOR problem to come out of externally forcefully imposed discipline is that too many of its victims are likely to just become sadistic psychopaths who want to take out their pain on others - which is something that is in the media quite a bit in recent years, so I’m not going to give more links on that now, but it is relevant to ... 


... my final point of consideration, which is: 

the savage and deliberate cruelty of the current US deportations, especially those to the abusive prison in El Salvador

There has been a significant amount of media comment that the cruelty of these actions is the point - i.e., those in the USA at EVERY LEVEL of that system are trying to cow the rest of the world into fearful subservience - much as those who use externally forcefully imposed discipline do. 

This WILL NOT WORK the way they expect - for the reaasons outlined above. 

All they are doing mostly is creating contempt for the USA as a whole, hate for those committing these psychopathic barbarities, and a fierce determination on the part of the rest of the world to distance themselves from that regime, and be exemplarily better

It will be decades before the USA recovers its reputation - if it ever does, and the era of the USA being predominant is over - killed by those conceiving of and committing these acts. 

In addition, many of the victims of these sadistic psychopaths will experience all the problems outlined above. The world will NOT in any way, shape, or form, be better as a result of what has been done to those people - even the tiny number who might actually have been what they were claimed to be.

Cruelty never pays off - but those committing the cruelty have shown to the Universe that they need lessons, and some of those lessons may have to be negative learning ... 

Some may not have to be negative learning - it is possible for people to learn from kindness and explanation and the like (as with the veterans I mentioned above, and the many people who fought on the Eastern Front of World War Two who did NOT wind up in the Iran-Iraq war), although they will still owe their victims a debt of healing. 

It should also be noted that negative learning is NOT externally forcefully imposed discipline - negative learning does NOT have the sadistic vindictiveness and extremism of externally forcefully imposed discipline: it is allowing a child to have a minor tumble when running over uneven ground, and maybe risk a bruise, to learn caution, rather than the beating-them-and-screaming-at-them of externally forcefully imposed discipline. 


The world has been damaged because a violently damaged human being was allowed in to power by cowards and willingly supported by also damaged amathiacs. 

We now have to choose to address this properly - and doing the work of this blog is a start, but physical world activism is also required - and this time, no-one’s character flaws (psychopathy, cruelty, etc) can be overlooked (although they must be dealt with in a BPM manner) out of a misguided desire to be or seem nice, and justice MUST be done and seen to be done for all the perpetrators.



Notes

 * Here are a few points to consider:   a former colleague of mine came from a poorer area of Asia, and once commented that anyone who was rich enough to own a car and wound up having an accident may find themselves ignored by those who were struggling to survive (a lesson many of the current billionaires should keep in mind) - which is not admirable or acceptable behaviour, but illustrates a human reality (and many rich people’s behaviour is also unacceptable);   some people take violent action either because they want to force a much-needed change (which does NOT work - see here), or out of their own pain (as with a recent, unacceptable but widely sympathised with murder of a CEO - and I won’t name the person because I wish to live by the no notoriety principle) - which, again, is not admirable or acceptable behaviour, but illustrates a human reality (and contributing circumstances may also be utterly unacceptable, which is one of the reasons why the “tough on crime” amathiacs will NEVER succeed [another reason is discussed above]);   and   there is an apocryphal Tibetan story about a sage who killed a king to stop the king creating more negative karma by committing bad deeds: that may seem to be spiritually justifiable, BUT (1) no-one alive ever has access to that sort of knowledge, (2) the killing prevented the king having an opportunity to learn or change in this life, (3) the effect on the king would also be similar to that of an execution (as discussed above), and (4) the act of the sage was NOT exemplary in any sort of good way - if anything, it would simply encourage more lawless vigilantism, and that problem is why I have added it to this list - it shows the problem of people WRONGLY thinking the end justifies the means

 ** One other aspect that needs to be mentioned here is that being the target of hate is damaging to the victim. There are some amathiacs (Goddess it was hard to write that rather than a slur *** ) who primly come out with utter claptrap like , but the TRUTH is that being hated damages BOTH the hater AND the victim. 

In some cases, where people are or have decided to be, nonBPM, they may actually relish in receiving hate and other nonBPM energy (often fear-based adulation [see the explanation around the “no notoriety” campaign for more on that]) and use it to become more nonBPM or commit more nonBPM energy work. 

 *** Which is the sort of act that one needs to make in order to start healing out of the damage done by trauma. Sigh.



Assumptions / basis 

In writing this, I have assumed / started from the following: 

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

  • there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking” 
  • I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.

 

If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and theres also other options

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/