Further to my post “Post No. 3,165 - Interviews on spirituality / spiritual paths” https://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2025/07/post-no-3165-interviews-on-spirituality.html , this post is one of my mediumship based (which raises the risk of errors, so keep your thinking caps on) interviews. (I am hoping this practice will improve my mediumship.)
These interviews are with nonphysical/ET beings.
The more conventional (audio) interviews with physical people will be on another platform (probably Substack at this stage, but those will take some time to set up), and will be relatively short (my initial target is around 10 - 15 minutes), comfortable style interviews aimed at people feeling safe enough to talk freely about what matters to them.
This interview is of: Braei-Noirte (pronounced Bri-knee) [Ed.: BN in editorial comments], who is my main extraterrestrial contact (through nonphysical means such as telepathy and astral travel)
Interview start
Would you introduce yourself please
I am a humanoid from a civilisation in the direction of the star you call Altair, although we are on the far side of that sun.
My species is generally of humanoid form, although we can change our form somewhat - partly by mental effort, and partly by technology. For us, the mental effort is easier, but we prefer to preserve that energy for more significant undertakings.
We can change our height, skin colour, and various ... "attachments" to make people more comfortable or more questioning, as is required.
Our travel is physical, but involves changing space, much as you have written about the concept of an Assemblage Point.
What religious/spiritual path do you identify with? Could you tell us a little about that, and how you came to be on it? Not having any such path is also a valid answer.
Our religion is Life.
Your planet gets hung up, as it is termed, on Deity, which is an immature quest for a spiritual parental figure - partly for a sense of approval and comfort, and partly as a way of avoiding growing up spiritually.
Praying to a Deity to give gifts to one or the harm others is not a mature, spiritually adult way to live.
Taking life when you no longer need to do so - and needing to do so in the past is irrelevant now - is also a sign of immaturity.
And what you are doing to your biosphere [Ed.: the climate crisis], and what you threaten to do when you keep weapons of radiation [Ed.: nuclear weapons] is like watching a toddler throw a tantrum, spiritually speaking.
Your greed - inequity, your wiser ones call it - is like watching a child grab the toys for themself.
We missed that ... form of existence, so we are far more automatically aware of the value of all Sentient Life, and of making sure such life is, at the very least, content, unthreatened, and able to thrive.
I should also note there are other civilisations - other extraterrestrials as you term it - who do not share our beneficence. They are ones you should be wary of.
[Ed.: when re-reading this, BN added a comment that the civilisations of concern are rarer, far fewer in number than those of beneficence, and able to be defended against spiritually]
What strengths does that path give you?
On a personal level, we obtain contentment and a sense of satisfaction or purpose, but we also use the principle your wiser ones have described as "as above, so below" to relate what we are seeing, and what is necessary to sustain and help life elsewhere to flourish, to aid us, on a personal level - both in our body and our non-body being, and in our groups, our civilisations, and other life.
To use an example your people can relate to, suppose we found a certain combination of rays of energy could disperse a form of selfishness based on insecurity, that could be used by us to improve the confidence and accuracy of our physical immune systems, our ability to assess new people more accurately, improve the treaties our civilisation makes with others, and address some solar or galactic confluences.
We also are growing and developing spiritually as a result of what we do to aid others.
What challenges does that path have?
Ah - the challenges. The challenges are the same that all learning comes with - the first being recognising that there is knowledge to gain, the second being to address whatever blocks incorporating that knowledge - ego, usually, for most of your people, the practicalities of incorporation for us. To put that simply, where and how does that knowledge fit with the rest?
Our religious wise people - our equivalent of what your people generally term priests, specialise mostly in that guidance: how to absorb or incorporate more knowledge, rather than how to seek, placate or manipulate an imaginary - no, an anthropomorphic - creation that you describe using words of superiority and suppression.
Have you been on any other paths? If so, could you tell us a little about those, and how you came to be where you are now?
In our early stages of existence, both personal and civilisational, yes. Answering that question is, however, somewhat complex to do in detail, and I suggest it be reserved to a future interview. I believe your show people talking about leaving them wanting more? Let this be part of that category for now - or mostly.
Obviously, it will relate to maturity, but maturity of perception in particular.
Do you have an interest in making the world a better place, and, if yes, do your religious/spiritual beliefs influence/enable that in any way?
As already advised, yes - we care about all life, and that includes all life on your world.
We do not seek to contact specific people or organisations - governments, as you term them, although we are aware others do. Our interest, which we have cultivated in you, is of the mass consciousness of those most able to change for the better (including you, you may recall, if you think back over your life), those who will help create an environs , a psychic soup as you have termed it [Note: this is one of several times BN and other nonphysical beings laughed or showed their sense of humour], that will enable others to be aided.
That is our interest, but, owing to a combination of imperfections, and noxious influences and confluences, we also have to address the more urgent issues that have been occurring - and your people's lack of active perception of the harm of what you term inequity, and what that leads to psychically, as well as the noxious environs you are creating, and the toxic threat of your weapons of radiation - which can do harm to the arrangement of reality, although not in the way you have speculated about on this blog.
That too, should be a matter for another conversation.
Do you have any particular thoughts on the current state of world that you wish to discuss?
Nothing further to that which has been provided thus far.
Are there actions you would like to see people take on any of these? Are your suggestions informed by your religious/spiritual path?
We would seek to have you all simply become more aware of the rest of the world - as it is in truth, not in display.
Your peoples quest for journeys is potentially of benefit, but it has become an entertainment [Ed.: tourism], when it should be a deeper connection with the people and land and places and things or organisation of those elsewheres that are being journeyed to - and those journeys using the eyes and ears [Ed.: TV, radio, Internet] can nearly be good as those which involve a presence of body in those other places.
Are there matters we, as individuals and as groups up to and including the entire species, avoid looking at that we should? If yes, do you have any suggestions on those?
Many, but for this interview, it is the refusal to become aware of others and their situations that causes us most grief, or concern.
Do you consider that the world can achieve a sustainable, genuine peace, and, if yes, how?
It is always possible, and it will come by replacing those structures of control that afflict your societies so. Power structures must go, and be replaced with structures of accepted responsibility and of caring for the greater good - which, when accepted as it truly is, means caring for all, and not creating layers in your society of falsely assigned and not real merit.
Religion and spirituality have been criticised at times for a number of controversial aspects, such as abuse of power, discrimination, enabling the maintenance of current social structures, hypocrisy / lack of genuineness, ideological fixation with dogma, inability to change, proselytising, an actual or perceived conflict with science / change / less common aspects of life (such as psychism), and so forth. Are there any such issues you have been concerned with? If yes, how have you addressed those?
This we have already touched on to an adequate degree for this session.
What else would you like to say?
Go Hawks [Ed.: more laughter, this being a gentle dig at my indulgence of AFL - including the support of a team that is not the one I barrack for, so I will reply: Go Dees 😁 ]
Who else would you like to hear an interview with?
Your Guides and, should you evolve the ability to do so, your Higher Self.
Interview end
Possible flaws
Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider:
- the accuracy of this is limited to the accuracy of my mediumship, and Readers should:
- at least peruse “The Spirits Book” and “The Book on Mediums” by Allan Kardec (see also here, here, here, and here),
and - read Stuart Holroyd’s EXCELLENT examination (which includes possibilities such as subconscious telepathy) of Phyllis V. Sclemmer’s mediumship, in “Briefing for the Landing on Planet Earth”
(pub. Corgi, 1977; first pub. W.H. Allen, London; Copyright © Lab
Nine, Ltd, 1977; ISBN 0 552 10997 5; as the re-issued “The Nine:
Briefing From Deep Space”: Barnes & Noble, Amazon; original version, sometimes titled “Prelude to ...”: Scribd, Internet Archive, Google Books, Amazon)
to get an idea of the possible limitations of mediumship;
- there may also be flawed logical arguments in the above (mine, or the person I am channelling): to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;
- I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also other options.
Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here.
(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)
Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).#PsychicABetterWorld and may all that I do be of value and actively BPM used for and by the nonphysical BPM because #KindnessIsThePoint
Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s
may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.
Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative
Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
.jpg)
