Post No. 3,510 - Heritages

Something I come across in the religio-spiritual and nearby/adjacent communities is people who want to have a particular physical heritage because they think it will confer special powers or prestige (“pop”, for the purposes of this post) on them. 

That is nearly as amathiac as those who think eating the remains of a vital creature will confer, in addition to physical protein etc, some measure of the special vital powers of that vital creature. 

In actuality, you are more likely to receive some of the anger and fear and panic that Sentient Being experienced as it was killed, than anything else.  

To those who quest for special genetics: 

• there are memberships of Indigenous groups that may be based, or based in part, on physical heritage (such as my own heritage - but First Peoples here [in Victoria, Australia] do NOT go down that path, as it is doing the colonisers’ genocidal work of breeding us out of existence for them); 

• there are genetic and epigenetic inheritances from parents and grandparents, but as those are traced back further, they are being combined with other genetic and epigenetic characteristics from other ancestors and are less likely to be significant; 

• human physical survival is based, in part, on a wide mixing of genetics, to ensure we do NOT become inbred - which was a notable issue for, if I recall correctly, European monarchies; 

• choose any famous person in history, and, if they had children, their DNA etc will be spread out and mixed with other people's DNA etc through a wider and wider group ... and at some stage: 
• the mixing makes the "special" presence meaningless; and 
• in ALL cases, the other vitally important aspects such as 
  (a) nurturing, 
  (b) the circumstances of that incarnation's existence, and 
  (c) what we bring into this life through who our Soul/Higher (Innermost/Truest) Self is and what our Soul/Higher (Innermost/Truest) Self has been through in previous incarnations - which is a similar error of misunderstanding/amathia to that shown by the carnists, 
  needs to be taken into account. 

In short, I am wary of seeking some special psychic or character “pop” through physical genetics - in fact, I do not believe it will work, unless you are also close enough to the person to share in family and other circumstances (e.g., sibling or child of that person), but there will still be major differences. 

Spiritual heritage in terms of who taught you in this lifetime is different: that is similar to checking whether someone obtained a degree from a genuine credentialed university or a fly-by-night dodgy operation. 

The problem is that there is no agreed, independent, objective award of credentials similar to that applying to universities - although traditions such as Reiki or specific Pagan/Wiccan paths will manage who they approve in accordance to their internal requirements. 

It also gets more complicated if you look at someone's true spiritual heritage, which involves the past incarnation and other (while not incarnate) experiences of the person and their Guides, and who their Deities of Service and Tutelage  are.  

Now, what led to me writing this post was coming across a few sites which claim to provide information about people’s “starseed lineage” - basically, their history of “incarnations” (some are nonphysical existences). 

Having made the points in the preceding, my comments on that are: 

• just as on Earth, every race or species (and I know the Zetas, for example, have scores of sub-divisions) off Earth is not a homogeneous block. There are variations - many individual - at any one time, and there are also variations that have occurred over time. 
  To use an earth analogy, having had a past life as a pre-Celtic European means you will not have any access to Celtic “pop”, and having past lives as a Celt is likely to involve changes as they moved from wherever they did come from to what is now modern day France and the UK. 
  If you have had a past life as particular ET species, that may not mean anything comparable to what that species is like these days; 

• the attributes identified to each species tends to vary slightly for each channel, and that, in my opinion, reflects: 
  (a) the flawed channelling of each person trying to do this work and, in some cases, errors where they are trying to repeat or build on other people’s work; and 
  (b) the (human) flaws of allowing personal and/or cultural worldview to influence channelling - especially concerning the gender spectrum (this is something that only Elena Danaan, IMO, came anywhere close to getting right [and keep in mind that we do change physical sex/gender over series of lives, and many interpretations/ascription of meaning of polarity are inherently flawed], but I do know there are transphobes and homophobes [and racists and misogynists] in the UFO/UAP/ET field); 

• these quests often miss the important result of us being, in some way, holograms of the entirety of existence, which is: we can quite possibly access the skills/attributes we admire/desire by learning how to meditate and/or use the assemblage point and/or get good BPM  guidance. 
  Such access is easier and deeper if you have had a past life as or in the desired/admired species, especially if they past life is recent rather than distant past, but NOT having such contact does NOT make access impossible - although you will still have to comply with normal good manners and respect, and that may involve being subject to to limitations on some aspects (which incidentally, may also apply even if you have recent or current lives ... so knowing something doesn’t mean you get to blurt it from the [digital] roof tops), but consider also that, in many cases - ESPECIALLY ET SPECIES - there are open teachers present here now, which is WHY you probably know about the skills/attributes you admire/desire. 
  As a First Nations example, consider “The Dreaming Path: Indigenous Thinking to Change Your Life” by Paul Callaghan and Uncle Paul Gordon (Pantera Press, Neutral Bay, NSW, 2022, ISBN 978-0-6487952-7-8; Amazon, Readings, Apple), which I have mentioned here, here, and here. 

In summary, information about any one of our past heritages can be useful or empowering, but the lack of a desired or admired heritage does NOT have to be disempowering: it just means you have to work at developing the desired skill/attributes/knowledge, just as with the overwhelming majority of the rest of us. 

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlightopossible flaws / issues youoshouldoconsider: 

• there mayobe flawedologicaloarguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ freeoonline course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
• I could be wrong - so keep your thinkingocaps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
  

  

Gnwmythr 

teaching the "good" (balancedopositive and spirituallyomature) 
safer ways to counter the "bad" (outoofobalance, spirituallyoimmature) 

 

If you appreciated this post, pleaseoshare it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi 
Any and all support will be greatlyoappreciated, and willoaid me in continuing this work 

 

Remember: we generallyoneed to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgenderingois an act of activeotransphobia/transmisiaothat puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptoroto prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. AI was NOT used to write this article. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/  

 

Post No. 3,476 - A frustration with the tech/hard science/evidence wing of the UFO/UAP/ET field ... and the sceptical aspects of the human rights field

There is quite a bit of commentary coming out about the UFO/UAP/ET field - particularly the topics of experiencers and (the Dr Stephen Greer term) disclosure - I’ve copied what I already have this week from the coming reading post below. 

Some of this is surprisingly good (e.g., this), but some of it is frustrating - predictably so, such as reviewers who mistake the animals in the child’s bedroom for shape-shifting extraterrestrials, rather than masking memories. 

I have also been catching up on a lot of older viewing in this field, and have been pleasantly surprised by researchers talking about human psychic/spiritual evolution/growth/development, and the predominantly beneficial influence of most - not all - ETs.  

It is also clear that a  lot of re-reporting of some evidence has been sloppy - almost criminally so, IMO. And there needs to be acknowledgement of Indigenous and “Eastern” thinking on these matters. 

But I still come across this predominantly white field showing poor awareness of structural discrimination (and overt discrimination, in many cases). I’ve realised now that part of this is because they - wrongly - consider being involved in an unusual field makes them “on the side of” those who are discriminated against -  co-sharers in pain, in a sense, which is actually utter nonsense. 

Black Lives Matter shows how utterly absurd such notions are.  

Of course, the human rights field also has problems, and their blind rejection of everything weird (the UFO/UAP/ET field) is one of them. To some extent I can understand that, as they do not want to do anything that could damage the credibility of the important human rights work they are doing ... but at some stage they will need to acknowledge their emotional and intellectual blind spots as well. 

We all need to improve our consciousness (something I am listening to has just had a researcher spout binary gender rubbish), and work towards a better world - one not in the control of the Jeffrey E class, corporations, or those entrapped by the glamour of power.  

At least some of the researchers are aware of the need to overcome war, as well as raise our consciousness - but any who praise the current head of the USA are showing themselves to have staggering blindspots and/or lack of perspective, and are promptly written off by me.  

See also  here,  here,  here,  here,  here,  here,  here,  and the following, from here:  

“The Real Disclosure Day: Scientists Revise the Rules for Announcing Extraterrestrial Intelligence”   https://unknowncountry.com/headline-news/the-real-disclosure-day-scientists-revise-the-rules-for-announcing-extraterrestrial-intelligence/   “New international protocols outline how evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be verified, announced, and managed—and reaffirm that no one should respond on behalf of humanity without global consultation.”   The last point, about global collaboration, is vital      BUT ALSO      While Whitley Strieber has done a massive amount of good for the experiencer and, more generally, the UFO/UAP/ET fields - including the bad experiences, every now and then he does something which makes me wary of him - such the praise at   https://substack.com/@whitleystrieber1/note/c-273311526   for the older form of the (religious [neochristian]) “Western mind”, which, as an Aboriginal woman whose people were subjected to genocide, a member of multiple minority groups subjected to the abuses of the patriarchy and capitalism and neoliberalism, and a human staring at the early devastation of the climate crisis, the so-called “Western mind”, a euphemism for “Western civilisation”, IMO, is not something to be taken as inherently or predominantly or uncritically “good” - it had its good points, but it also had slavery, colonialism, industrialisation, and the destruction of human, social, and environmental capital in Indigenous systems which created things like Yindyamarra, Yindyamarra Winhanganya, Dadirri, and Ngumbaadyil. 
Finally, for the sake of clarity: my view is that the majority of extraterrestrials visiting this planet are part of the Gardeners of the Universe, who have the intention of serving Life (including the sort of activist intervention used by First Peoples here to turn this continent into a park for tens of thousands of years), and most western academics/investigators/experiencers struggle to comprehend that because they (1) lack the benefit of Eastern and/or Indigenous thinking, and (2) have been too warped by the patriarchy-capitalism-neoliberalism troika. When they get over an excessive focus on tech and physical evidence (some focus is necessary and good) and look at consciousness (including a whispered hint of personal/spiritual growth - of betterment as individual people) they often start to work more effectively with the complexities and nuances of the Gardeners of the Universe + nonBPM extraterrestrials + other BPM & nonBPM “NHIs” (i.e., non-human intelligences - which I point out includes a lot of sentient Earth-evolved life) and the multiple BPM & nonBPM interactions that can and DO occur between those groups and the various sub-groups of humans ... AND those interactions can and do show the need of a number of those ETs to improve how they do those interactions to be more respectful and empathic;  

I may add more to this in due course, and wish to emphasise my frustration is with many, not all, of the older researchers in this field who have, IMO, a problematic emphasis on tech/hard science/evidence, and have not yet realised the vital importance of consciousness. 

 

From this week’s coming reading pot: 

“Beyond Disclosure: The Abduction Mystery”   https://youtu.be/VHNi44gp_Ic   I was a bit dubious about this before I watched it because of what seems to me to be the host’s bias against consciousness aspects of this field, but it turned out to be reasonable - well worth watching, thinking about, and making up your own mind (the description of two filmmakers not filming a sighting was particularly pertinent, IMO, but “abductions” have not stopped being discussed in my part of the world). The guest’s comments about timing of interventions suggesting we need to fix our problems ourselves as mature adults. I’m now definitely going to watch the documentary (when I can).   AND ALSO   From the director of the recently released “The Experiencers: Full Disclosure” (NOT the Spielberg film):   “The Alien Perspective”   https://youtu.be/qe0qHyl8Ynw   (2024)   - there is a second part, but that needs to be purchased or rented   AND ALSO   “Why Didn't I Hate Disclosure Day?”   https://youtu.be/GigW0ffAL54   “I went into Disclosure Day fully expecting to hate it. Instead, I found myself ... well ... enjoying it, and that surprised me. In this video, I share my immediate reactions to Steven Spielberg's latest film, discuss why so many people seem genuinely angry about it, and explore a larger question that extends well beyond this movie itself.   Have our expectations surrounding disclosure become so large that disappointment has become inevitable? This is not a movie review in the traditional sense. It's a reflection on Disclosure Day, disclosure culture, and perhaps the state of our society as well.   Just saying.”   AND ALSO   “Disclosure Day is an Activation (Not just a movie)”   https://youtu.be/hX-QUA4PMZc   “Stephen Spielberg’s new movie is more than entertainment. And the content is highly relevant to what we are going through right now.”   AND ALSO   “Jun 17, 2026 - Linda & Drs. Hurtak give a Higher Conscious Review of Spielberg's Disclosure Day”   https://youtu.be/yIEqGkDCOhA   AND ALSO   Not related to disclosure, but good information and attitudes:   “Walking with the Tall Whites: Aftermath”   https://youtu.be/H_bo2Wzxw1E   “The second documentary in the series, following Charles Hall as he explores humanity's hidden coexistence with three extraterrestrial species on Earth. Based on "Millennial Hospitality" book series”    (I don’t agree with everything said)   

 

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

• there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
• I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
  

 

 

Gnwmythr 

teaching the "good" (balanced positive and spiritually mature) 
safe ways to counter the "bad" (out of balance, spiritually immature) 

 

If you appreciated this post, please share it. I am now on SubStack, Patreon, 
and you can support me at PayPal (or PayPal Repeating Support Options) or Ko-Fi 
Any and all support will be greatly appreciated, and will aid me in continuing this work 

 

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here, and Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2026     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/