Post No. 2,984 - A classification system for energies and other units

When people are using psychometry or some other psychic sense/skill, there is generally an expectations that what is being identified (or sensed/perceived) will be described. This is sometimes described light-heartedly (and sometimes used to trivialise or mock) along the lines of the meeting “tall, dark, and handsome under the lamppost” trope.

However, I consider people dive in to trying to describe specifics too quickly - most psychics can take a lesson from the training given to Remote Viewers in at least some courses/books, part of which is often along the lines of “what is the atmosphere like?”, or “what does it feel like?”

Taking a step back, influences can broadly be:  

• beneficial; 

• harmful; 

• neutral (as in, not affecting).

Each of those could, broadly speaking, be because of one or more of the following: 

• active or deliberate influence; 

• lack of action (much as failing to throw someone who is drowning a lifeline or buoy is allowing harm by inaction, and not throwing oil to someone in a fire is beneficial by inaction); or 

• harmonious/disharmonious reactions (e.g., someone who is allergic to a medicine would find being given that harmful, or more mildly, someone who neither likes nor dislikes a colour scheme will be unmoved by being exposed to that colour scheme, and someone who likes a type of music will benefit from from others who don’t will not).
  

And, given that there could be multiple reasons for influence, whatever is being assessed may have a mixture of influences - e.g., the colour scheme could actually include colours that are liked or disliked, as well as those that are neutral.

So ... assessing a unit, I suggest, could first involve assessing which one of the three categories it is (keeping in mind that this could change over time, or in different places, or as a result of different groups of people/units - a group of friends will give someone strength and equanimity when listening to a form of music they don't normally like, but being with someone who is a strong fan may exacerbate the disharmonious reaction, for instance), and then ascertaining - including for the neutral influences - what the mechanism is. 

Then, having determined the broad context, start to narrow your focus on the traditional sorts of specific details. 

So the above can be presented as a tabulation (or matrix, if you prefer). I can’t create those in Blogger, so I've done it elsewhere and am importing it as a figure: 

 

 

 

If you create a table along these lines, it may help you record and sort your impressions - while learning, at any rate.  

 

PS - maybe something similar can be done for refining sensing of units beyond this? 

If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also Instagram. 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here. 

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and   

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/